User talk:Iapetus

This user may have left Wikipedia. Iapetus has not edited Wikipedia since 12 October 2020. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Welcome!

Hello, Iapetus, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Hurricane111 20:17, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Tripoli Agreement

Thanks for stub-sorting the Tripoli Agreement. You may be interested in editing the Chadian-Sudanese conflict. KI 21:44, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Solar eclipse

Thanks for the speedy vandal rv! Nick Mks 17:27, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

We need to compromise on Beagle

I have been making a change in the Beagle article in good faith and some people seem to want to start a revert war with me. The image in question shows a beagle smiling, while using the caption to describe it's sense of smell. This is a terrible image to use, as it does not illustrate the beagle's sense of smell at all. It only shows it's wonderful ability to smile, and possibly it's ability at sticking it's tounge out. We need to find a compromise where this image is remove, or the caption changed. Otherwise, I will continue to edit this page until a solution can be reached.

How about removing the image until a suitable one showing a beagle tracking or as a drug sniffing dog can be found? The only other possible solution is to change the caption. Please respond quickly. Very quickly. 83.31.186.247 00:03, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the caption is perhaps not the most appropriate and relevant to the image; however, I don't think that repeatedly altering it without discussing your reasoning for the change on the talk page is really necessary. I would suggest reviewing Wikipedia:Captions, and then if you still feel that this supposed issue is significant enough, bringing it up on the talk page. --Iapetus^TALK|C|@ 00:09, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Formatting my userboxes

Thank you Mr. Turner.

Ryan 00:36, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism?

2 times last night I was accused of vandalism, the first time, was by you, the second, was by an admin, who I have found out made a mistake. I did not commit any vandalism, apparently, you accused the wrong IP adress, I was wondering if you could clarify what the vandalism was? Just to make sure. Thanks. -68.202.128.153 23:23, 11 October 2006 (UTC) =)[reply]

1. I don't see how this is vandalism, in fact, a portion of my edit is still there today, surely, if it were vandalism, someone perhaps, might have deleted it?

2. I was wondering if you could delete the vandalism warning, I feel like it's a mark on my reccord. *shudder* I don't want to get banned. By the way, thank you for your help in this issue. 68.202.128.153 00:52, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Vandaled

Pleas take a look of the history by http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:24.234.113.226 on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brian Thornton

Please think about more than a warning for this IP Address. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.26.58.64 (talk) 05:34, 8 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Onetrickpony.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Onetrickpony.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:05, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Cravemancover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Cravemancover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:35, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Fevercover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Fevercover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:37, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mr. Noodles for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mr. Noodles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mr. Noodles until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 23:01, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Fevercover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fevercover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:26, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Iapetus. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Iapetus. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]