User talk:Ian 1975

Welcome!

Hello, Ian 1975, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 20:48, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

1st warning for desruptive editing in article List of the busiest airports in Europe

This is the 1st warning for desruptive editing in article List of the busiest airports in Europe. One cannot delete Russian and Turkish airports at the pretext they are not in Europe and keep at the same time African (Canarian) and Asian (Larnaca) airports in the ranking). Please stop your desruptive editing, otherwise your account may be suspended. Thank you.

2nd and last warning for desruptive editing in article List of the busiest airports in Europe

This is the 2nd and last warning for desruptive editing in article List of the busiest airports in Europe. One cannot delete Russian and Turkish airports at the pretext they are not in Europe and keep at the same time African (Canarian) and Asian (Larnaca) airports in the ranking). Please stop your desruptive editing, otherwise this will be reported to Administrator and your account may be suspended. Thank you.

Warning

January 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kazakhstan. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Double sharp (talk) 10:06, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) Borat vandalism, really? Waatese (talk) 23:43, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kamala Harris. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:14, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kamala Harris, you may be blocked from editing. clpo13_(talk) 19:54, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You've reverted three times on this article ([1], [2], [3]), so another revert would put you over WP:3RR and likely see you blocked for edit warring, especially if you don't explain your edits and provide sources. clpo13_(talk) 20:01, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Aegean Airlines, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jetstreamer ^Talk 20:27, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Air Europa, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Jetstreamer ^Talk 14:47, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did on SkyUp. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Linking to another Wikipedia article is not sourcing. Jetstreamer ^Talk 14:51, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jetstreamer kindly refrain from vandalizing this entry. Get informed instead on the 737MAX situation. Every single one of my edits is sourced.

I strongly suggest you to inform yourself about what vandalism really is before accusing another editor of being a vandal.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 13:47, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Ukraine International Airlines. Jetstreamer ^Talk 13:42, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Air Europa; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jetstreamer ^Talk 13:46, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent activity at Air Europa and Blue Air

Regarding this [4] reversion of yours, it is clear that you do not understand the WP:VERIFY policy. Your edit has been reverted (as also this [5] one has been). The next time you reinstate such information in either article without providing sources I will file a report against you both for disruptive editing and for falsely accusing me of vandalism.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 19:53, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I strongly suggest you to stop treating anyone who is not in agreement with your edits as a vandal [6].--Jetstreamer ^Talk 22:13, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User keeps calling vandals at those editors not in agreement with their edits. --Jetstreamer ^Talk 12:43, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Hello,

You have been temporarily blocked for making repeated personal attacks. You have been making accusations of "vandalism" in content disputes since 2018, particularly in the past few months. This needs to stop. Personal attacks during content disputes are unacceptable. ~Swarm~ ^{sting} 02:07, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:48, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orlando Zapata

It is very poorly written. The article needs a complete rewriting. References are required for assertions. The grammer, spelling, and tense are sub-standard.

What is written is not the problem. HOW it is written ruins the article and the information is lost behind the myriad  mistakes. 99.250.25.63 (talk) 18:15, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Your recent editing history at Granit Xhaka shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Adeletron 3030 (talk • edits) 14:18, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

National varieties of English

Hello. In a recent edit to the page 2026 FIFA World Cup, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. Sounder Bruce 08:48, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Your recent editing history at 2026 FIFA World Cup shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Consensus is to use the host country's variety of English; in this case, American and Canadian English both use "soccer". Sounder Bruce 08:19, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If I might add something: Ian 1975, you falsely accused me of vandalism because you didn’t like my reverting your edit. You need to stop doing that. I can see from both your block log and further up on this very talk page that you’ve previously been blocked for exactly that same sort of conduct. Disagreement with your edit doesn’t mean you automatically win and that anyone else is vandalizing an article. If you sincerely disagree, take it to the article's talk page. I don’t know that it will help your cause in this case because the issue has been discussed in the past and WP:CONSENSUS was to use the word "soccer" when the World Cup is played in countries that call the sport by that name, but nothing's preventing you from reopening the issue. 1995hoo (talk) 15:53, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Revolutionary Organization 17 November, you may be blocked from editing. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 21:29, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am stating facts. 17N is a terrorist organization and its members convicted for dozens of acts of terrorism. Ian 1975 (talk) 08:32, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Revolutionary Organization 17 November. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 14:14, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop threatening me and instead accept the facts of the matter. 17N is a terrorist group. Ian 1975 (talk) 08:07, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Revolutionary Organization 17 November, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 15:28, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kid stop threatening people. Grow up! Ian 1975 (talk) 16:08, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:50, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Knock it off Given your editing history, and this latest fairly brazen disruption, this is likely to be your last block with an expiration date. -Ad Orientem (talk) 02:51, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]