User talk:Iamjep1987

This user, in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, discloses that they have been paid by Tomi Arayomi for their contributions to Wikipedia.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Iamjep1987 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was using an template for me to create a sanbox. when i was saving it my account was blocked automatically. Please let me know if i violate any rules for wiki. Iamjep1987 (talk) 14:29, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I see no block on your account directly. If you are unable to make edits, please exactly follow the instructions that appear when you attempt to make an edit. 331dot (talk) 15:24, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Iamjep1987 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi Admin. I think i know the reason now i cannot edit due to I use this IP on user TAM-Resources which I believe i violate policy on submitting and editing an article. I will be more diligent on creating a article and be mindful of what is needed to be done. I am reviewing every detail. Also due to unforeseen circumstance we no longer have access to the email address use for the account. If i can use this account and IP address. that would be helpful for us. I am a volunteer for the person I am creating a article. I don't earn any monetization for this. I intend to make contribution to things that i have may know to my knowledge. I know that creating a second account was wrong. it is written on your policy. I asked a person from the US to create an account which is TAM-Resources and i also sent an email to create an account on my own using the IP address. I think that would be one reason. But I will be using this account Iamjep1987 moving forward. And I might be on the other places while doing the edits. If you can unblock my IP that was associated with TAM-Resources is a big thank you on my end and will be mindful of the Policy that was taken place for WikiIamjep1987 (talk) 15:42, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No. See below. Drmies (talk) 16:06, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

So--if I follow all this correctly, you emailed someone in the United States to set up an account for you, User:TAM-Resources, which you then used from your own location to write up the spammy draft at Draft:Tomi Arayomi--for a living person in a completely different part of the world. After 331dot blocked the TAM account for spamming and a username violation, you started this account (I can't tell how) and tried to edit from your own location--on an IP which was caught under the block for the TAM account. What this tells me is that the system works, since autoblocks are intended to stop vandals and spammers from just doing it again after getting blocked.

I don't see any need to unblock you since you never explained your relationship, as TAM or as Jep1987, to the supposed prophet Tomi Arayomi: there is nothing about that draft and its history (meaning, your account and what geolocation tells me) that suggests you are here to improve our beautiful project. Instead, everything tells me that this was a failed attempt at writing a promotional article for money. Drmies (talk) 16:12, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Iamjep1987 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The individual residing in Houston, Texas was one of my peers who collaborated on Draft:Tomi_Arayomi. As I mentioned earlier, I am a volunteer assisting them. I initiated the account creation process on August 30 and was able to communicate with the individual who created the account around September 6, if I recall correctly. Subsequently, I received an email from Wikipedia on September 7 confirming the account's activation.

Being new to Wikipedia, I was unaware of the specific guidelines, and I may have unintentionally violated some rules related to draft content. Upon reviewing the talk page, I realized that linking to certain pages might have been the reason for the spammy draft classification. That's why I wanted to inform you about the usernames that have been used in connection with this matter.

I appreciate your assistance in addressing this issue.

Iamjep1987 (talk) 16:24, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This account is not blocked. Please do not abuse the unblock system. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 18:07, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tomi Arayomi (September 18)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Qcne was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Does not meet WP:NPEOPLE.

Qcne (talk) 18:32, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Iamjep1987! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 18:32, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: User:Iamjep1987/sandbox has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Iamjep1987/sandbox. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 17:25, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Theroadislong Thanks for the edited version. Can this be submitted? I asked around teahouse and said that i can't resubmit the same article. Iamjep1987 (talk) 01:27, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Hello Iamjep1987. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Iamjep1987. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Iamjep1987|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 15:35, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tomi Arayomi (September 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 331dot was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tomi Arayomi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

331dot (talk) 15:36, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tomi Arayomi (October 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Phuzion was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tomi Arayomi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Phuzion (talk) 06:04, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Tomi Arayomi

Hello, Iamjep1987. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tomi Arayomi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:24, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Tomi Arayomi

Hello, Iamjep1987. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tomi Arayomi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:00, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]