User talk:NoorBD

October 2024

Hello, I'm Knitsey. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Sheikh Mujibur Rahman seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Knitsey (talk) 22:51, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If I did anything different than the rules of Wiki, I apologize for that. I'm not violating the wikipedia. Please try to understand some folks are working towdars to omitt the actual history of bangladesh. IamNoorMohammad (talk) 04:43, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, you may be blocked from editing. Also adding spam links, formatting errors Knitsey (talk) 23:21, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Sheikh Mujibur Rahman. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 23:22, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sheikh Mujibur Rahman. Niasoh (talk) 04:16, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

{{subst:uw-first}} NoorBD (talk) 11:20, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. NoorBD (talk) 11:21, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to assume bad faith when dealing with other editors, as you did at Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, you may be blocked from editing. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. Niasoh (talk) 04:24, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Sheikh Mujibur Rahman. This is exactly what you were asked by three other editors above not to do. Please also see this information about edit warring. Use the article talk page to discuss the changes you want to make, but do not edit the article repeatedly to add your preferred content when several other editors revert your edits. bonadea contributions talk 12:27, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Star Mississippi 17:50, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|reason=I have contributed positively to the historical content on Wikipedia, specifically related to the history of my country. However, my account has been targeted by individuals with opposing views, which has led to a block. I respectfully request an indefinite unblock, as I aim to continue editing and contributing to the content with a neutral and factual approach. I have a commitment to enhancing Wikipedia’s coverage of historical events and seek to do so in line with Wikipedia's guidelines and principles.}} NoorBD (talk) 03:36, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NoorBD (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have contributed positively to the historical content on Wikipedia, specifically related to the history of my country. However, my account has been targeted by individuals with opposing views, which has led to a block. I respectfully request an indefinite unblock, as I aim to continue editing and contributing to the content with a neutral and factual approach. I have a commitment to enhancing Wikipedia’s coverage of historical events and seek to do so in line with Wikipedia's guidelines and principles.

Decline reason:

If I were to unblock you, it seems you would continue to be disruptive. I am declining your unblock request. PhilKnight (talk) 04:23, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

NoorBD (talk) 03:37, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Indefinite Unblock: Commitment to Neutral and Constructive Contributions

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NoorBD (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have contributed positively to the historical content on Wikipedia, specifically related to the history of my country. However, my account has been targeted by individuals with opposing views, which has led to a block. I respectfully request an indefinite unblock, as I aim to continue editing and contributing to the content with a neutral and factual approach. I have a commitment to enhancing Wikipedia’s coverage of historical events and seek to do so in line with Wikipedia's guidelines and principles.

Decline reason:

Duplicate request. PhilKnight (talk) 04:23, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.