User talk:Iair.rozen

Your thread has been archived

Hi Iair.rozen! You created a thread called How to establish notability for my Satguruma's Biography at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:05, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Shree Shree 1008 Satguruma Paramahansa Sadhvi Trideviji

The article Shree Shree 1008 Satguruma Paramahansa Sadhvi Trideviji has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. MB 17:03, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Shree Shree 1008 Satguruma Paramahansa Sadhvi Trideviji moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Shree Shree 1008 Satguruma Paramahansa Sadhvi Trideviji, does not conform to Wikipedia’s neutrality policies, and as such you should submit this article to be published through the Articles for Creation process. Before editing the article further, please first disclose on your user page and on the article's Talk page whether you have received money to write this or other articles on Wikipedia, or if you have any other kind of conflict of interest concerning the subject. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. Before submitting, you should make sure that the article is fully compliant with Wikipedia’s neutrality and verifiability policies, as well as our notability guidelines. When you’re ready, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. This process is encouraged, but optional. If you choose not to participate in it, you can remove the AfC template and move the article back to mainspace. You should also consider reaching out to the Teahouse for additional feedback and aid from experienced editors. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 06:44, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I declare I definitely don’t have any conflict of interest.

Why do I want to write this article? To add value to Wikipedia, the free encyclopaedia, with information that feel relevant as a meditation practitioner y spiritual searcher. This Guru is relevant in this context and in many places that’ve been to. And I never understood why her name doesn’t belong to this body of knowledge. So I decided to do it myself.

I couldn’t say anything other than this. In fact, it was not easy to gather all the acceptable material para the platform. At the same time, it is not difficult to get to know about her. You can check the sources yourself. You can also check how many searches she gets.

Once again, I have done my best not to break any code or guidelines.

I will submit a new version for revision before publishing it.

Speedy deletion nomination of Satguruma Paramahansa Sadhvi Trideviji

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Satguruma Paramahansa Sadhvi Trideviji, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. bonadea contributions talk 08:34, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the guidance below:

When you write about a person, you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that they meet the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the person or an associated organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the person claims or interviewing them. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls.
You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews.
There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. You must also reply to the COI request above.

You said The article is the result of my personal spiritual research, but this is an encyclopaedia, not for your WP:OR. The refs don't all meet the criteria above, but the big problem is the hagiographic nature of the text, basically just promo or unprovable claims eg Mataji has been a meditator since She was 3 years old, when She received the Transmission from Her grandfather, who She considers to be Her first Master.... With the passing of the years of conscious Seva, personal practice, scientific investigation and academic formation and with the sensibility from Her Siddhis, Mataji has developed different techniques that foster the connection with the Divinity and the inner Human Nature in every Being fact-free gushing praise sourced to Tatri or Her Darshan; that IS beyond any technique or words; the energy that manifests in all Life and that is psychically perceptible. meaningless, gushing and unsourced. There is no way of even telling if she meets the notability criteria, so few real facts buried in the adoration. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 11:13, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jimfbleak - talk to me? 11:13, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Satguruma Paramahansa Sadhvi Trideviji (September 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MapleSoy was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Thanks for creating this article. To meet Wikipedia's standards, we would need to see significant coverage of the subject in multiple independent, reliable, published sources (not just her own website), such as magazine or newspaper articles. Please revise and resubmit if such sources exist.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Satguruma Paramahansa Sadhvi Trideviji and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Satguruma Paramahansa Sadhvi Trideviji, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MapleSoy (talk) 02:08, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Iair.rozen! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MapleSoy (talk) 02:08, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Satguruma Paramahansa Sadhvi Trideviji

Hello, Iair.rozen. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Satguruma Paramahansa Sadhvi Trideviji, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Satguruma Paramahansa Sadhvi Trideviji

Hello, Iair.rozen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Satguruma Paramahansa Sadhvi Trideviji".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! S0091 (talk) 15:56, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]