User talk:Iadmc

This is a Wikipedia user talk page.
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Iadmc.

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14

Note: Archives 1-12 are of User Talk:Jubileeclipman

This user has semi-returned due to Wikipedia issues and other personal reasons...
(User talk · Email me · Subpages · All logs)

"I don't want the truth! I want something I can tell Wikipedia!" - Jim Hacker Yes Minister "The Writing on the Wall" (paraphrased)

Category:17th-century Franco-Flemish composers has been nominated for merging

Category:17th-century Franco-Flemish composers has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:10, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May music

Thank you for your support for Haydn! - Today's story mentions a concert I loved to hear (DYK) and a piece I loved to sing in choir, 150 years old (OTD). - Five links to composers in that one hook, DYK? -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:15, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that! Not my favourite composers, though.... I'm actually listening to the Haydn string quartets at the moment. Some georgeous music there.— Iadmc ♫^talk 21:29, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. - Five composers, and four have an infobox ;) - The Zemlinsky opera I heard has some gorgeous music. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:42, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Today's focus is Ethel Smyth (per the TPF), written by many, also with an infobox, and I wonder if it could become GA if not FA even. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:05, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think the Composers group is as acrive as it once was. Certainly the militants - if we can call them that - are all gone. Ethyl Smyth is an interesting composer. What can we do to make it GA? — Iadmc ♫^talk 06:02, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June music

I just wrote to you on Mahler, and want to get a bit more personal. Ethel Smyth: I just found her article well sourced, but don't know much about her. My only contrib so far was the infobox ;) - I like to give prominence to woman in music.

Infoboxes: some users think nothing changed, and I believe things changed, but not those users. There is a general acceptance now for infoboxes for people who also composed classical works - most of them also being musicians, conductors, teachers ... - but not for articles written by those users, Mahler being one of them. I described my approach a while ago, in a nutshell: add an infobox (directly in the article), but if it is reverted walk away ;) - Adding: it may also help not to think of colleagues as "militant". Listening to music is much better! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:37, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Gerda Arendt Thanks. My approach is to ask. But Bold Revert Discuss works too. — Iadmc ♫^talk 14:22, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ask, and you'll get the same no by the same people. I just received one on Mahler (and here I tried to explain in detail ...) - ignore ignore ignore. If you visit my user page, there are two related discussion, about how to mention works in composer's infoboxes (because: see. Mahler), and about a possible MoS change. Perhaps read those to get a feeling for the minefield that these harmless boxes have become (and I don't know why, must have happened before I even joined, and thought it was over in 2015 when the Beethoven compromise was found). --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:35, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The infoboxes thing has been going on since the beginning of Wikipedia. The composers group was especially vocal against them. Read through the various discussions and the RfC... Also, read the composers' advice on their project page. — Iadmc ♫^talk 14:41, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ps: Kafka died 100 years ago OTD, and some discussions look kafkaesque to me ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:37, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Gerda Arendt lol — Iadmc ♫^talk 14:41, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may know that I was "sentenced" in the infoboxes arbcase, and Kafka and Bach were my replies ;) - I was FA conom for Kafka for FAC, DYK? (And guess what: I also didn't change.) I was a FAC conom with the leading writers Brian Boulton and Tim Riley for Messiah (Handel), and that's why Tim's responses take more effort to ignore than those of others. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:48, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ah. OK. History. Me too: I was Jubileeclipman until I scrambled my password and moved away from it all. I returned as me now to see if anything had changed and it seems some things have, others not... I initiated the infobox RfC, so some of the old guard generally dislike me... — Iadmc ♫^talk 14:59, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I like you. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:12, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! — Iadmc ♫^talk 15:16, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the new boxes! As explained for Leighton: you can keep it simple, just add a box and unwatch. It will stay or not, who cares ;) - Of the hundreds I added, few were reverted, typically the featured articles, and Stockhausen. In today's story, I list four composers, one too short for a box (would need translation from French first), two had one, and I added one. I recently had a DYK with five composers, and Mahler was the only one without. The infobox wars were over by 2015 (with Beethoven), or 2023 (with Mozart), only some users refuse to accept it. - The basic misconception is that the box has to "sum up", - I said already in the Beethoven discussion that not even the lead can do it. No, it just has to provide key facts at a predictable place. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:52, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is the composers group still active? No word of objection or support from there! A shame if it is dead. — Iadmc ♫^talk 07:56, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I'm the wrong person to ask ;) - I was a friend of Jerome Kohl (wrote his article, read his talk: we missed the same people). He liked infoboxes for compositions, and came to accept those for composers, - see Aaron Copland. I never lost the respect of Brian Boulton who gave me great feedback in the FAC for Kafka and other articles. After they both died not much seems left of the "group". I was never a member but run the cabal of outcast ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:09, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's the first I knew JK and Brian are dead. :( I guess we are all getting on... Kohl helped me start the 21st-century classical music article and guided me on other things. Requiem in Pace — Iadmc ♫^talk 08:17, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GuillaumeTell is dead too as is SlimVirgin. Both sorely missed! — Iadmc ♫^talk 08:29, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I met GT, Andrew Cooper, just after the infobox RfC. Great guy. — Iadmc ♫^talk 08:30, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, missed much. I keep the memory of Jerome and Brian on my talk whenever there's a Recent death on the Main page (which is almost daily), - cheating a bit today, because Hugues Gall was yesterday, but that was Kafka's day - 173k views even the day before (no stats yet for yesterday). --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:37, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New pics of spectacular weather, with Donner. Another interesting person: Alexander Lang. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:08, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I saw that article. Looks interesting — Iadmc ♫^talk 21:10, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And hail, fire and brimstone here today! — Iadmc ♫^talk 21:11, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Today's story is about a tune used by Bach and Mozart. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:00, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's lovely! Thanks — Iadmc ♫^talk 20:47, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Bach and Mozart use the compromise introduced in 2013 for Percy Grainger, by Brian, with a neutral list of works as a summary of a composer's achievements. After stability for more than a decade, it was recently removed for Grainger and for Schumann, which makes me sad, but I am not the person to be heard in the matter. You seem to be more in favour ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:33, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not quite sure what you mean by "a neutral list of works as a summary of a composer's achievements". The blocks of paragraphs at Percy_Grainger#Music is a bit daunting though! — Iadmc ♫^talk 12:43, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As you will recall, a key objection to an infobox for classical composers was that their achievements cannot be summarised (and let's not debate if a summary is even needed). Brian, however, introduced a link to the List of works by Percy Grainger in his attempt to find a compromise, which seemed clever and reasonable to me, and remained stable until now. I believe that the infobox would be more meaningful with that link. Same for FAC article Schumann. The list was there since 2020, and stable until last week. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:59, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ah! I thought it was standard to link to the List page. obviously not @Gerda Arendt— Iadmc ♫^talk 15:59, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I added the list of works back to Grainger's infobox and raised the issue for Schumann at FAC — Iadmc ♫^talk 16:10, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I had typed some explanation but you seem to be good at mind-reading and don't need it ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:39, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Today I wanted to write a happy song story, on a friend's birthday, but instead we have the word of thunder on top of it, which would have been better on 2 June, this year's first Sunday after Trinity. The new lilypond - thanks to DanCherek - is quite impressive. As my 2 Jun story said: Bach was fired up. - Today's Main page is rich in music, also Franz Liszt and a conductor. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:11, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Great about main page - except the Eurovision! — Iadmc ♫^talk 15:06, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Still great. I checked the histories for Grainger and Schumann in more detail. Grainger: it may interest Tr that our friend Brian pursued the "rotten idea" (which had been the key idea of infobox classical composer if you ask me) in his first approach for a compromise in 2013. It stayed until someone else removed it in 2016 (which I didn't see then). I restored it because it was in the first design. Schumann: the infobox is old, but I added the "rotten idea" when I brought Clara Schumann to GA. It remained stable until very recently, - with dozens of edits per day in the process of bringing it to FA, I didn't see that either until later, or I could have reverted it on the spot as a bold edit. Your turn ;) - You may remember that Brian wrote this essay. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:42, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll not disturbe Schumann while it's at FAC. Maybe later. The arguments by Tim against the list going in the infobox are ludicrous: it links elsewhere (bad), Bonn, Clara etc being in the body already is OK, though... Hm, they still link elsewhere! Makes no sense. Anyway, I don't want to start an edit war or anything so I'll wait — Iadmc ♫^talk 15:50, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Don't edit war in the article, but complete the discussion during the FAC. These FA writers love to cite "the agreed FA version" as if it was something holy preventing changes. I don't want to enter because I feel uninvited from their reviews. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:58, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hm. The problem is Tim seems to run the show no one else has commented on the issue. Oh well I'll crack on — Iadmc ♫^talk 16:20, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Normally people don't even look at the comments of others. He can be such a gentleman, and was to me, and I have no idea what changed that (in 2016, not in the early days of infobox discussions). I certainly didn't change, nor my attitude towards accessibility ;) - When I look at the the stats for Schumann's works I think I see when the link to the list of compositions left the infobox, - is that really what we want? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:46, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Here no explanation except "additional info and refs; rem uncited material". I'll bring it up. — Iadmc ♫^talk 17:02, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did you read the Forcelink discussion linked from my user page which clearly said it's not a breach of MoS? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:59, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have now. Interesting — Iadmc ♫^talk 02:18, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I worked on Kafka, and find it kafkaesque to disconnect a composer from his works. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:55, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm out today. Short question: what do you think of the Aaron Copland compromise? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:03, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sneaky... LOL — Iadmc ♫^talk 15:09, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Today is "the day" for James Joyce, also for Bach's fourth chorale cantata (and why does it come before the third?) - the new pics ("places) have a mammal I had to look up. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:37, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why does Beethoven's 2nd piano concerto come before the 1st? Haha! — Iadmc ♫^talk 15:49, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, in 1724, there was St. John's Day (#3) before the Third Sunday after Trinity. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:46, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Now confused.com... LOL — Iadmc ♫^talk 18:47, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Trinity moves with Easter. In 1724, the first Sunday after T was 11 June (18, 25). In 2024, it was 2 June (9, 16). St. John's is always 24, which was before the third in 1724, but is after the third in 2024. - New pics of food and flowers come with the story of Noye's Fludde (premiered on 18 June), written by Brian Boulton. I nominated Éric Tappy because he died, and it needs support today! I nominated another women for GA in the Women in Green June run, - review welcome, and more noms planned. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:33, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your support for Tappy, on the Main page and my story today! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:43, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! — Iadmc ♫^talk 15:48, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dvořák might be a candidate for a bold infobox, looking at the contributors. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:22, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just cited all the premieres! Might just try that... Not just yet though I'll check it out — Iadmc ♫^talk 12:24, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Laudonia (ensemble) (June 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Laudonia (ensemble) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 23:33, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Iadmc! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 23:33, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mystagogy of the Holy Spirit has been accepted

Mystagogy of the Holy Spirit, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ca ^{talk to me!} 04:10, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

BLPPROD

I saw your comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chiel Meijering about sources and BLPPROD. While normally personal websites are not sources, BLPPROD has a different interpretation of sources. The second sentence of BLPPROD says "To be eligible for a BLPPROD tag, the entry must be a biography of a living person and contain no sources in any form (as references, external links, etc., reliable or otherwise) supporting any statements made about the person in the biography." The composer's website is a source for the purpose of BLPPROD. His website confirms he is a composer, so it is ineligible for BLPPROD. ~ GB fan 18:54, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh OK thanks. Never knew that. I'll watch for the future — Iadmc ♫^talk 19:23, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to climate change, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 20:43, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources

Hi Iadmc! First, I want to thank you for your dedication to verifying content on Wikipedia.

I wanted to let you know that I've reverted a couple (1, 2) of citations you added, as I couldn't verify the source. Also, I noticed a few other sources you've been using might not be ideal for citing some historic facts of composer biographies (some examples: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 [interlude.hk and voutsadakis.com], 6 [theportobelloorchestra.co.uk], 7, 8 [lumenlearning.com, even the source itself states that the content comes from wikipedia!], 9, 10, 11). They don't seem very reliable and most of them may even be borrowing information from Wikipedia itself, which can create a loop of unverified content (like what's depicted in this XKCD comic, which i'm sure you already know about).

Given these concerns, I feel the need to notify @Cremastra as the coordinator of the June 2024 Drive, just to double-check and to ensure we're all on the same page. I hope this helps us find even more robust sources moving forward.

It's important to ensure Wikipedia remains a trustworthy resource for everyone. Thanks again for your contributions. Cheers. — Gor1995 𝄞 10:39, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Gor1995. I was concerned about some of those too. The Wikipedia Library is frustating as the cite tool just links to it rather than the actual article I found. I've brought the issue up at WP:Village Pump (technical). My score can be adjusted accordingly if my sources are bad! @Cremastra Thanks again. Keep checking our reliability out! — Iadmc ♫^talk 10:44, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deducted 44 points for the unreliable sources. Still want to sort out the Library sources so I left them — Iadmc ♫^talk 11:04, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

queen prime minister president USA and sixth spice girl

my career working FionaMacaskill (talk) 20:42, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

LOL! — Iadmc ♫^talk 10:42, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the DCWC!

Welcome to the 2024 Developing Countries WikiContest, Iadmc! The contest is now open for submissions. List your work at your submissions page to earn points. If you haven't done so already, please review the following:

Got open nominations? List them at review requests.
Looking for a topic to work on? Check out suggested articles and eligible reviews.
Not sure if your article qualifies? See the guidelines for more information or contact a coordinator for verification.
New to Wikipedia? Many experienced editors are part of this contest and willing to help; feel free to ask questions about the contest on the talk page.
Know someone else who might be interested? Sign-ups remain open until 15 July, so don't hesitate to invite other editors!

On behalf of the coordinators, we hope you enjoy participating and wish you good luck! If you have any questions, please leave a message on the contest talk page or ask one of the coordinators: Ixtal (talk · contribs), sawyer777 (talk · contribs), or TechnoSquirrel69 (talk · contribs). (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list.) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 00:01, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July music

The story is today about the first published composition by Arnold Schönberg which I was blessed to hear. Listen, and perhaps read what Alma Mahler (to-be-Mahler at the time, to be precise, who was present at the first performance) said, and yes that was too much for the Main page ;) - I gave the composer an infobox without problems, and Verdi might be another candidate. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:44, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Today's story is about a Bach cantata premiered 300 years ago OTD. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:32, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

3 July is the birthday of Leoš Janáček, and I'm happy I had a meaningful DYK in 2021. It's also the birthday of Franz Kafka, and I uploaded pics from his family's album seen in Berlin. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:35, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I love Janacek! The Cunning Little Vixen is brilliant. — Iadmc ♫^talk 20:10, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, saw it in Munich, Jenůfa in Frankfurt and Káťa Kabanová in Wiesbaden. Noticed only now that the singer would have been 100 years tomorrow, so will keep the story for another day --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:02, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Libuše Domanínská, the subject of yesterday's story, would have turned 100 today, but I missed that ;) - Overnight, Tamara Milashkina became GA and Lando Bartolini went to the Main page. I made my story about his almost unbelievable career, from Luigi in Il tabarro in Philadelphia in 1968 (with a nod to Liberty) up to Calaf in Turandot in Beijing in 1999 ;) - 4 July is also the birthday of Brian Boulton who was a pioneer of a concise infobox in 2013, including a list of works. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:15, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On a friend's birthday - she is pictured on my talk - I have another RD death article that needs reviewing, Martti Wallén. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:58, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pictured on the Main page: Brian's Mozart family grand tour, my story today, and Mozart related to all three items of music on my talk: our 2023 concert, an opera in a theatre where a Mozart premiere took place, and those remembered, Martti Wallén, a bass, and Liana Isakadze, a violinist from Georgia, (whose article would be better with more details about her music-making). --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:22, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My story today is - because of the anniversary of the premiere OTD in 1782 - about Die Entführung aus dem Serail, opera by Mozart, while yesterday's was - because of the TFA - about Les contes d'Hoffmann, opera by Offenbach, - so 3 times Mozart again if you click on "music" ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:01, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Today's story is about a photographer who took iconic pictures, especially View from Williamsburg, Brooklyn, on Manhattan, 9/11, yesterday's was a great mezzo, and on Thursday we watched a sublime ballerina. If that's not enough my talk offers chamber music from two amazing concerts. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:31, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Gerda! Just having time out for now. I'll be back soon. — Iadmc ♫^talk 18:52, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Enjoy your time off, and congratulations to the effort celebrated below! - Just a look at music (on my talk) shows remembrance of three people who died, and creating an article or improving one is all I can do. Three are on the Main page today, and three others planned ... --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:29, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Main Page history/2024 July 30b will have a baritone, a violinist, a composer and a Bach cantata, - almost too much, and the composer's article, Wolfgang Rihm, should be better, help wanted. - Plenty of music on my parents anniversary day ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:53, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thanks for participating in the June 2024 backlog drive!

You scored 3104 points while adding citations to articles during WikiProject Reliability's first {{citation needed}} backlog drive, earning you this Order of the Superior Scribe of Wikipedia (ossw). Thanks for helping out!

Pichpich (talk) 21:46, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024 drive thanks

Azure Barnstar

Congratulations, Iadmc – during the June 2024 citation needed backlog drive, you scored more than three thousand points and came first on the leaderboard, earning you this rare azure barnstar. Thanks for helping the encyclopedia with a key problem. I hope you enjoyed participating in the drive. Cheers, Cremastra (talk) 22:37, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DCWC August update

The 2024 Developing Countries WikiContest has now been running for a month, and we've already seen some momentous improvement in the quality of many articles about underrepresented subjects! So far, our top-scoring participants are:

Magentic Manifestations (submissions) – 338 points, mainly from nine good articles. He's a contender for the "most submissions for a single country" specialty award, with nine submissions for India.
Arconning (submissions) – 305 points, including from six seasonally-appropriate Olympics-related good articles.
Generalissima (submissions) – 290 points, the bulk from her featured article about Greenlandic interpreter Qalaherriaq and two China-related good articles.
AirshipJungleman29 (submissions) – 245 points, mostly from the achievement of bringing Genghis Khan to featured status.
Thebiguglyalien (submissions) – 144 points from three good articles, including two about Kiribati elections, and four reviews of good article nominees.

Looking for ways to climb up the leaderboard yourself? Help out your fellow participants by answering a few review requests, particularly the older entries. Several more nominations needing attention are listed at eligible reviews, and highlighed entries receive a 1.5× multiplier! The coordinators would like to extend a special thanks to Thebiguglyalien (submissions) for his commitment to keeping these review pages up to date.

If you have any questions, please leave a message on the contest talk page or ask one of the coordinators: Ixtal (talk · contribs), sawyer777 (talk · contribs), or TechnoSquirrel69 (talk · contribs). (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list.) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 14:24, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August music

story · music · places

Today I have three "musicians" on the Main page, one is also the topic of my story, like 22 July but with interview and the music to be played today -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:06, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 13 August, Bach's cantata was 300 years old, and the image one. The cantata is an extraordinary piece, using the chorale's text and famous melody more than others in the cycle. It's nice to have not only a recent death, but also this "birthday" on the Main page. And a rainbow in my places. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:30, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DCWC September update

The Developing Countries WikiContest has now been running for two months, and we've seen tremendous improvement in the encyclopedic coverage of several underrepresented areas from a wide range of editors! The coordinators would like to highlght some of the newer faces who have been making notable contributions in the contest, including but by no means limited to:

Arconning (submissions) – 386 points, with several good articles primarily relating to the Olympics
Vigilantcosmicpenguin (submissions) – 141 points, who created multiple articles about abortion rights and laws in African countries
TheNuggeteer (submissions) – 126 points, who has contributed to several articles associated with the Phillippines
Jaguarnik (submissions) – 125 points, with several good article reviews and an appearance in the In the news section of the Main Page
Averageuntitleduser (submissions) – 119 points, and has written about several Haitian topics and historical figures.

Only one month remains until the end of the contest, so it's time to make your remaining nominations! Please consider answering some review requests, particularly the older entries, as a way of helping out your fellow participants and moving up the leaderboard. Good luck!

If you have any questions, please leave a message on the contest talk page or ask one of the coordinators: Ixtal (talk · contribs), sawyer777 (talk · contribs), or TechnoSquirrel69 (talk · contribs). (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list.) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 22:00, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DCWC closing update

The 2024 Developing Countries WikiContest has come to a close! After a thrilling finish to the event with a slew of submissions on the final day, we have our winners. With 608 points, Thebiguglyalien (submissions) comes in third with his series of Kiribati and Botswanan submissions; BeanieFan11 (submissions) flies into second place at the last second with 771 points after a string of good articles about sportspersons; and after leading for much of contest's three months, Generalissima (submissions) finishes with a whopping 798 points to take home the Gold Belt Buckle. Congratulations to our winners!

In addition to his spot in the top three, BeanieFan11 (submissions) also wins the special awards for submitting under the most countries (44 countries) and for writing the most articles about women (15 Did you know? nominations)! Magentic Manifestations (submissions), after making 16 submissions under the Indian flag—15 of them good articles—receives the awards for most submissions for a single country and most featured or good articles promoted. For their submission of one FAC review, five FLC reviews, and 20 GAN reviews, Simongraham (submissions) wins for most article reviews.

The results of the contest have far exceeded any expectations the coordinators had for it at the beginning: among the submissions to the event were 3 FAs, 10 FLs, 88 GAs, dozens of article reviews of every kind, and more Did you know? submissions than we can count! Regardless of your level of participation, every contestant can be proud to have contributed towards a major step in countering the systemic bias on Wikipedia. Every year, millions of readers and editors around the globe use Wikipedia to educate themselves and communicate with others about parts of the world that often receive less attention than they deserve. Thank you for participating with us in the contest and contributing to this effort. The DCWC will return next year and we look forward to seeing you contribute again! However, before that...

We need your feedback! Join the conversation on the talk page to discuss your reflections on the contest (even if you didn't participate!) and help us make it better.

If you have any questions, please leave a message on the contest talk page or ask one of the coordinators: Ixtal (talk · contribs), sawyer777 (talk · contribs), or TechnoSquirrel69 (talk · contribs). (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list.) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 19:02, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Laudonia (ensemble)

Hello, Iadmc. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Laudonia (ensemble), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:07, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]