Jump to content

User talk:I JethroBT/Archive 5

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1←Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6Archive 7→Archive 10

Your free 1-year Questia online library account is approved ready

Good news! You are approved for access to 77,000 full-text books and 4 million journal, magazine, newspaper articles, and encyclopedia entries. Check your Wikipedia email!

  1. Go to https://www.questia.com/specialoffer
  2. Input your unique Offer ID and Promotional code. Click Continue. (Note that the activation codes are one-time use only and are case-sensitive).
  3. Create your account by entering the requested information. (This is private and no one from Wikipedia will see it).
  4. You'll then see the welcome page with your Login ID. (The account is now active for 1 year).

If you need help, please first ask Ocaasi at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com and, second, email QuestiaHelp@cengage.com along with your Offer ID and Promotional Code (subject: Wikipedia).

  • A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a Questia article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free Questia pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:Questia/Citations.
  • Questia would love to hear feedback at WP:Questia/Experiences
  • Show off your Questia access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/Questia_userbox}} on your userpage
  • When the 1-year period is up, check the applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi EdwardsBot (talk) 05:07, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

thank you for your answer

Hi, Thank you for answer my question in Teahouse. I just feel frustrated by the fact that a link from an English page item to the Chinese page is not possible. But I'll see how to improve my wiki page further. Would you please take a look at the page which I just created? Would you please help me to improve it by give your advices? Thank you again. Qiao. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 河中桥 (talk • contribs) 11:11, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

RfC

Great idea going with an RfC. My honest opinion is that it will pass overwhelmingly - which is why it's such a great idea you had.

Keep up the great work! And keep the great ideas flowing!

--Activism1234 00:53, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Your username

Thanks for including the "not a bot" bit in your signature.

Having a little time, I decided to read the RFC that you link near the top of this talk page, but apparently the discussion has been archived; did you mean to link here? Nyttend (talk) 03:50, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. I had it linked correctly on my userpage...but I guess I forgot to change it here. It's been fixed. As for the "not a bot" bit, I agree. I think it is for the best. Though sometimes, I wonder how one could be uniquely disruptive if they genuinely pretended to be a bot. Maybe I am just not imaginative enough. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 04:40, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
Concerning your name... Is it a tribute to Leroy Jethro Gibbs? --Activism1234 04:51, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
Good guess, but it's not that Jethro (but that said, not many people are aware of Gibbs' middle name!). I got the name Jethro in high school because 1) my real first name is incredibly common and 2) Because my friends were fans of the rock group Jethro Tull. I didn't start liking them until much later. It's also a tribute to some of the earliest science fiction stories about artificial intelligence.
Interesting! Leroy and Jethro always struck me as an interesting part of Gibbs' name, and they mention his full name sometimes on the show so I remember it. You're an NCIS fan too? --Activism1234 05:03, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
Well, I've watched some here and there, but probably not the most dedicated fan, no. Probably out of all the crime dramas, I think I'm still partial to Law & Order. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 05:06, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
Interesting, I'm a fan of Law & Order:SVU. --Activism1234 05:09, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive239#What happens to proposals that...

Per your comment at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive239#What happens to proposals that..., I have posted a close request at here. Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Requests for closure is generally the venue to request closes of proposals. Hopefully, an assessment of the consensus before you initiate a more widely advertised RfC will be helpful. Best, Cunard (talk) 00:54, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

you sir, are awesome because after having used the google hoaxes page several times and have been impressed and astounded every time! thanks for providing a wealth of information and helping wikipedia!!!

DeathFrog (talk) 06:40, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Color text for refs

Thanks for the invite! I left my comments WhisperToMe (talk) 07:27, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the invite too! Bgwhite (talk) 07:34, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for the invite too! :) Bgwhite (talk) 07:34, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
I'll keep the second one for posterity, Bg. :P I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 07:35, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Page Curation newsletter

Hey I JethroBT. I'm dropping you a note because you've been using the Page Curation suite recently - this is just to let you know that we've deployed the final version :). There's some help documentation Wikipedia:Page Curation/Introductionhere that shows off all the features, just in case there are things you're not familiar with. If you find any bugs or have requests for new features, let us know here. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 11:54, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

WAAF

Thank you for your diligence on WAAF against the repeated vandalism from one user who hasn't figured out the rules. The WAAF page is one I have done a lot of work on and keep very close tabs on. So as an editor who knows what he is doing to another, I want to extend a thank you for your work and effort, and if you need any backing/help/support against that repeated vandal, let me know. NECRATSpeak to me 08:54, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

  • Anytime. Those spam links were being added to many radio stations, as it turns out, and I only happened to catch it because I was patrolling recent changes at the right time! You might want to keep an eye out for any anonymous IPs on those pages in the near future. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 17:54, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
Will Do! I have about 50-100 pages I am up to patrolling now. NECRATPlates On 08:07, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, I JethroBT. You have new messages at Jmorgan (WMF)'s talk page.
Message added 03:25, 26 September 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Jmorgan (WMF) (talk) 03:25, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 September 2012

Info

Hi. You may find this Wikipedia essay interesting if you have not seen it yet. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 04:57, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

When you get closer, don't hesitate to ask me for an off-Wiki assessment. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 06:06, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
Thank you. Out of curiosity, do you think my username (that it ends in "-bot") will produce significant level of opposition? Is there any way I can reasonably address those concerns other than pointing to the RfC (listed at the top of this page)? I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 06:10, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
It's almost sure to create a concern. You could consider requesting a name change and it would get you some extra kudos for doing it. Something like User:I Jethro perhaps? Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 06:19, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
By the way, per this conversation with Dave, I've decided to wait about a year or so before I seriously consider adminship. I think I have the right attitude for the mop, and although I am proud of my work so far, I don't think my editing reflects my attitude and knowledge of policies very well right now. Of course, there's no shame in that-- it's not a race or anything! So, it might be awhile, but in about a year, when I have had a chance to make my reputation more apparent, and also decide if I think I am ready, I'd like to request an assessment from you. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 05:31, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
No shame in it at all - I waited nearly 6 years, but that's no time at all at my age ;) Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 06:53, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, I JethroBT. You have new messages at Electriccatfish2's talk page.
Message added 16:33, 28 September 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Electric Catfish (talk) 16:33, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know, but please note that it was reverted as a good-faith revert, not as vandalism. Best, Electric Catfish (talk) 16:40, 28 September 2012 (UTC).
Sorry, you're right. I didn't mean to say vandalism, but rather an edit in error. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 19:41, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
It's fine and thanks for pointing it out to me. I just wanted to be clear that I'm not incorrectly identifying edits as vandalism or rollbacking incorrectly. --v/r Electric Catfish (talk) 20:59, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Stub tags

Please take care not to add {{stub}} to an article like Fred T. Sterling House which already has a specific stub tag (or two, in this case). Here you added a stub tag, added another, removed the duplicate ... but none of it was necessary or useful. I've reverted. Thanks. PamD 09:17, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 01 October 2012

Editors named Jethro

Consider adding yourself to the category I created, Category:Wikipedians named Jethro! --Jethro B 03:44, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Just so you know, that category is virtually guaranteed to be deleted at CfD. I suggest you request deletion. Ryan Vesey 03:50, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
Delete it if you want, it's not something I'm passionate about, but what's the issue with it? --Jethro B 04:33, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, I JethroBT. You have new messages at Wikipedia_talk:Teahouse/Host_lounge.
Message added 00:01, 5 October 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

SarahStierch (talk) 00:01, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Re: Moodbar

Thank you --Tito Dutta ✉ 06:37, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for the message Jethro, that primer was very useful! :) Polkanov4 (talk) 16:24, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

You're absolutely welcome! I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 16:29, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for introducing me to the Tea House too! :) Polkanov4 (talk) 07:40, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

1st Article

well i am new on wikipedia and this is my 1st article. so some mistake are done by me but, i hope now you will be satisfied with my article. plz review it again and tell me. i hope my submission will be accepted now . have a Gud Day . I Jethrobot — Preceding unsigned comment added by Farwah khan (talk • contribs) 18:49, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, I JethroBT/Archive 5. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by NtheP (talk) 21:18, 6 October 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

Harpenden

I still think it would be helpful to change it to 'Harpenden, Hertfordshire'. As it makes minimal bad effects on anybody. Firstly, if you type Harpenden into Google, your result on maps is Harpenden, Hertfordshire. Even if there is only one Harpenden, this is the correct term to use. Also one who used social network sites such as Facebook needs to mark their current location as Harpenden, Hertfordshire. Just using Harpenden is too vague to tell where someone lives. Please take my advice, I understand what you are saying but with all respect, including the county, 'Hertfordshire', would also help.

thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anasoon212 (talk • contribs) 21:34, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

how to add source information for edit to name

Dear I Jethrobot, Thanks for your note of explanation. The source for my info is Ani herself, who is a friend of mine. An online source could be to provide the contact information to her record company, which is http://www.righteousbabe.com/contact/index.asp But how do I add that to the edit I already made? Or do I have to undo that edit, and redo it and provide a source? I think Wikipedia needs to put better instructions in it's help section about how to do this, because I have already spent more than an hour trying to figure it out and could not. Canyon.falcon (talk) 21:41, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

No, you don't need to undo and redo your edit. You can just edit the page as it currently is. Also, it looks like the source you pointed to doesn't list her full name, so you'll want to use one that does. Her record company might be able to be contacted, but the purpose of a reference is so that the information can be verified directly, rather than having to contact an institution or a person. When you do find one, you can put this citation next to her name using this syntax:
<ref>(url goes here without parentheses)</ref>
You can also check out this referencing guide for more help. Wikipedia is complicated at first, but if you ask questions and practice using it, it's not so bad. I've also found This general primer to be helpful, too. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 21:51, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

Grammar! It took me forever to get here!!

Hi, I,Jethrobot! It took me forever to find my way to this page ... I hope you don't have a 'bot hacking every single bit of electronic (whatever) I own. Thank you for even asking me a question. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Minutiae07 (talk • contribs) 21:50, 6 October 2012‎

I'm sorry that was hard to find my talk page. You can always get to a user's talk page by going to their user page first, and then clicking the "talk" tab at the top of the screen. And also no, I'm not really interested in hacking anyone, ever. Was it my username that confused you? I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 06:25, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Edundja, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rally for Democracy and Progress (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:05, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

ty

thanks 4 ur help
ty i am writting a paper 4 school JasmineVance (talk) 23:12, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

k — Preceding unsigned comment added by JasmineVance (talk • contribs) 13:07, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Act of Contrition

You asked for an explanation at the RfA. If you don't mind I will answer here rather than take up room at the RfA. I have 5 adult children and 13 grandchildren. When my second son was 10 years old, he carved his name into a bus stop bench. I saw it and asked if he had done it. He said he did. We went to the bus stop, waited for the next bus, and I had my son apologize to the driver for his act of vandalism. The driver was quiziczl and probably didnt have any idea what was going on. But...my son knew there would be consequences to his actions. I dont know what User:Sigma's act against Conservitopia was. He will not elaborate. But I get the impression that he didnt UN-do it. Even now, a year later he could do something, anything. His regret and apology to wikipedia editors is meaningless. ```Buster Seven Talk 07:08, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

I would argue that a sincere expression of regret of one's poor judgment or an apology is never meaningless, but I can understand that this might not be sufficiently satisfactory for some, and that a clearer undoing of harm would be valuable. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 07:18, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
Meaningless in the sense that Wikipedia and its editors were not "the harmed", not the victim of his vandalism. So why apologize to us. He might as well go to Amazon.com and say he regrets his actions. They dont mean anything since they are directed at the wrong party. I accept his expression of regret and don't intend to sound vindictive. From the supports I get that he is a good editor. This little delay in his admin coronation will most likely do him good. Nice to meet you. ```Buster Seven Talk 07:34, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
Likewise. Thanks for your insights. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 07:36, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
The Friendship Barnstar
Nice to meet you. ```Buster Seven Talk 07:42, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 08 October 2012

I am completely confused

I am an artist and I would like my wiki information public. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KEVINMTHOMASBAND (talk • contribs) 00:15, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

RfA question ..

Having seen your request at the RfA page - I'll elaborate a little once it has concluded. — ChedZILLA 21:29, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

OK Jethro - here was my thinking. I'd seen posts by Sigma which left me with a distinct impression that they were quite young. Alone, that's not a bad thing - and indeed we have several fantastic admins <25 who are far more capable than a few of the over 40 group. (Kei, Julian C, JDelanoy, PeterS, AnonDis come to mind immediately - but I'm sure there are others). Here's the thing though - I was left with the impression that Sigma was impulsive, and when confronted, not adept at explaining his actions or even communicating at a level that admins. need to communicate at to be effective. I also felt that Sigma's intentions were good, and that they were here for the right reasons as far as editing goes - BUT being a good editor is a far cry from being a good admin. If someone is vandalizing (at worst), or disrupting (at best) a website - (Conservapedia in this case) - of if they are ummmm ... engaged in horseplay (joke oppose at RfA, April 1 OTT items, and "look I can make an Alt+Numberpad sig" type of actions .. then the maturity level isn't what's needed for Wikipedia (IMHO). It was different back in 2004 - 2007, when "Wikipedia" was not as "mainstream" and high-profile as it is today. It actually was /not/ a big deal back then .. but today it is. I had no desire to point fingers, find fault, or pile-on Oppose him, but I did want to register my view that I didn't think it was a good choice to grant him the "admin" buttons at this time. (I'll also note that I didn't even use my "admin" account to register my "oppose", as I didn't want to to be taken as some sort of "super-vote") - but I most assuredly did not think that they were ready for the responsibility that goes with the buttons. A couple years from now might be a whole different story - but at this point in time, I'm sorry - I didn't think it was a good idea. If you have further questions, by all means feel free to drop by my talk and ask - I'll do my best to explain my thinking to any-and-every-one's satisfaction. Cheers and best. — ChedZILLA 23:13, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
I'll be responding here to keep the thread all in one place. I think you've explained yourself well enough, and not only do I appreciate it, but I generally agree with your assessment.
A couple of disagreements: I think it is unfair to call Sigma's signature an example of "horseplay" in that it has no appreciable value in terms of judging maturity levels in itself. I also think, that while it is a nice gesture to contribute to RfAs as your not-admin self, I think most alternative accounts from non-admins are still readily identified by many (but not all) editors as their admin counterparts (like yours-- I certainly did). So, if there is any influence of admin opinion (which there may or may not be), I think the account you contribute with doesn't matter a great deal, because you would be recognized as an admin either way. I also question the whole "wait a couple of years" argument, because 1) It's an arbitrary amount of time, and 2) There's no clear understanding for sigma or the supporters of what is supposed to happen during that time that is supposed to remedy the concerns addressed at the RfA.
That said, I still acknowledge your concerns about Sigma in terms of explaining their actions, and communicating at a level that is expected for admins, and (perhaps) maturity levels. Whenever their next RfA is, I hope Sigma can address those issues. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 07:43, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
Well I certainly would not have opposed, and perhaps would have even supported if the Username/sig. were the only issue. I prefer things I can type easily from an "English" keyboard - but it's hardly bright-line or me either. Delta/Betacommand would be a good example of a user I thought well of who chose an alt+num name. I do understand there's a certain "pride" in knowing the little ins and outs of things like that - as well as perhaps being proud of some fraternity ~ either way, a very minor issue in my mind. I can always copy/paste or look-up the key combination for important things, and especially when one is not troubled by another user simply typing out "Sigma" - it becomes moot.
The "admin" posts being regarded as somehow superior to a non-admin post is likely a conversation that could go on a bit, but no real need. Personally I place my weight on the person rather than the rank - but I suspect there are others (for multiple reasons) that attribute more weight to some perceived status. In fact, I don't even have the admin. highlighter active on this account. :)
I also agree that my choice of words "couple of years" was arbitrary. If another RfA comes around in X months, I'll re-evaluate from scratch at that time. Sometimes there's an amazing increase in clue in a short time - so we'll see.
On a side-note - it's real pleasure to meet you I Jethro. (and I don't say that lightly since I'm often cynical and jaded in many wiki-areas these days). Have a great one. — ChedZILLA 18:11, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
The feeling is mutual! Having conversations like this also make me less cynical about Wikipedia.  :) I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 18:16, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

OTRS

Random question; have you considered applying to be an OTRS user? You do great work on the feedback dashboard, and we're always looking for more people to answer readers' and new editors' questions :). Ironholds (talk) 13:29, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

cool; thanks! :). Ironholds (talk) 13:40, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Re-write of my article: "Relapse Prevention: No cure for obesity/overweight

Hi I Jethrobot

I've re-submitted my article. Would you be so kind as to let me know if my submissions are being done correctly? I am quite new to Wikipedia. Please help guide me through this process. I'm trying to follow the directions that Wikipedia provides. It's just that, at times, I'm not quite sure what they mean. Let me know if you got the article: "Relapse prevention: No cure for obesity/overweight. Thanks. DrdeenagailDrdeenagail (talk) 21:35, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Part 2 Drdeenagail

How do I get you to a link of my article? Drdeenagail (talk) 21:39, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Hi Jethro

First, thank you so much for getting back to me. I'm really floundering with this and knowing that you're there is great. I'm in the process of getting a Web Site. As of yet, I don't have a URL. I don't understand why my current article isn't coming up for review though. I'm 63 and a year ago was computer illiterate, not an apology, just a fact. I had to call a friend and ask what a URL is. Ok, there you have it, that's the level of technical knowledge I have. I'm trying to get on Widipedia because I'm committed to a peer review process which demands greater accountability, more than blogging or facebook. If you're able to help me terrific. If I'm overstepping what you and Wikipedia offer, I'll find someone to help me master this. So, if I don't have a URL how can I get my article to you? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drdeenagail (talk • contribs) 17:18, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Part deux: Nevermind, I got your comments. Terrific! Thanks, I will make it more original. Any suggestions Jethro are fully appreciated. You have no idea how you've helped me. I'll go back and try again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drdeenagail (talk • contribs) 17:22, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

  • Hey, I think you are doing stellar considering you were computer illiterate a year ago. I'm really impressed. I also think your reasons for being here will make you an excellent editor. (Also, sorry-- I moved your message with your previous ones so everything is all in once place. Hope you don't mind.
Thanks for reading my comments. By the way, if you ever need to send me or some else a website, you just need to copy the address at the top of your web browser (whether that's Internet Explorer, Firefox, or Google Chrome), and paste it in text form in the editing box when you write a message. After you've pasted it, just put brackets around it like this: [], and that will provide a link you can click on once you post your message. What else can I help you with? Also, you can ask questions at The Teahouse-- I'll send you an invite in few moments. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 17:28, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
Ok, how much do you need to know to believe that I've been researching appetites/moods with relationship to food for over 30 years so,indeed, the profile that WHO developed for addictions fits exactly when describing food/eating. I'm confident of this since I've been working with patients for all this time. Another factor is, I've kept off over 70 pounds since 1980 with the method I've been developing. I'm wondering, if Wikipedia is the correct venue for me. I have research data for over 3 decades from the clinical application of classical and operant principles and have outcome data. Unfortunately, since it's based on "fee-for-service", publication in journels will be unlikely.
Jethro, my book proposal was given a green light from a top agent in NY. Unfortunately, I have no platform. Agents want to see so many hits on facebook, tweeting, blogging to assure that when I go for book signings, the store is filled to the hilt. I wanted to launch through Wikipedia to maintian some component of integrity. Unfortunately, even reference to my 1991 Doctoral Dissertation was seen as self-promotion. Lap-bands are popping out of peoples stomachs. In the last decade, I've been getting gastric-bypass patients. First, they're learning how to binge so they're gaining all their weight back, also,because Calcium an Vitamin D is not being absorbed, bones are beginning to be pitted. Throid's compromised, they're left with a severly compromised autoimmune system. This is what the medical model has contributed to obesity/overweight. ENOUGH!!!
There is no self-promotion here. I have a mission to save lives, if it's done anonymously so be it. I'm wondering if another venue might be more appropriate to support my passion and need for a platform. I think I've just answered my own question. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drdeenagail (talk • contribs) 18:07, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
You have, indeed, answered your own question. In the spirit of good faith, you may want to check out one of one of these alternative outlets for your work. I think another important point is that on Wikipedia, a consensus of editors have agreed that Wikipedia is not the place to tell folks about your personal mission, even if it is a noble one (and I believe yours certainly is one of them, and am glad you spend your time this way). This is not really saying that your cause is unimportant, but that an online encyclopedia should not be a vehicle to make your cause more visible (which is a kind of promotion, just not for the sake of profit). I'm sorry about any misunderstandings, and I hope you can contribute to the project in other ways. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 18:24, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
You have no idea how you've helped me. Yes, I'll check out the other sites. You're absoultely correct about the limitations of what I can offer to Wiki and, what this site can accomplish for me. Intuitively this was obvious, it just wasn't clear as to why. You've answered that. Thanks for moving me in a direction that will better get my message out. I'm not savvy to the rules and regulations of how all this technologu works so, since my Wedb page isn't available yet, is it ok for me to give you my blod site? If not, I completely understand. It would be unfortunate to compromise the work you're doing for Wikipedia. AAron Sorkin's "Newroom" stated that Wikipedia will create a paradigm shift in journalism in the following years, and I fully concur. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drdeenagail (talk • contribs) 19:00, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

A frustrated new editor

I hope this new editor heeds our call to slow down and to educate her(?) self in the comings and goings here. I empathize with new editors that have the drive to start with a BIG project. I had the same experience when I started years ago. It didn't get anywhere but I look back and realize all the individual exploring and learning that I did to get it "right". Alot of "How did they create that.."? kind of stuff. And then replicating what I found on the "edit" page. Your outreach to her was right on time especially the reminder that we are ALL volunteers. She needs to help herself the most as other editors fill in the gaps. ```Buster Seven Talk 11:22, 11 October 2012 (UTC).

  • Thanks. I think the editor has their heart in right place, but has different expectations about interactions on-wiki, which is OK. I think that kind of curiosity you described about "How did they create that" can go a long way in terms of becoming more familiar with Wikipedia, or most skills, for that matter. I'm sure you know this much better than I do! I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 17:38, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

A kitten for your help!

Thank you for your response. My class as a whole is working on Wikipedia, and I was responding in regards to several of our experiences. The Red Pen of Doom, has been actively blocking our changes for the past two weeks. We admire how hard people work to keep Wikipedia accurate, but there are some grammatical changes that should be kept. I can tell you that after this assignment, very few of us will continue to try to edit Wikipedia because of the negative responses from the "WikiSheriffs" as we call them.


BreeandCo. (talk) 21:08, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, I JethroBT. You have new messages at Kudpung's talk page.
Message added 23:06, 12 October 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Talkback

Hello, I Jethrobot. You have new messages at RAIDENRULES123's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time.

DEIDRA C. (talk) 01:23, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Response from Ruayda

I am not confused with anything. I just want to be adopted. Thank you for your Feedback. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ruayda (talk • contribs) 15:48, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Response from Vra101

Yup, I understand. Sometimes it's necessary. Thanks for clarifying; my friend was a bit confused.

Vra101 (talk) 22:42, 13 October 2012 (UTC) vra101

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dorina Frati, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Festspielhaus and Victoria Hall (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Tireless Contributor Barnstar for giving a helping hand to new editors at the Feedback Dashboard. KAS( talk) 17:33, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you! (2)

The Special Barnstar
Thank you Haloreach1234 (talk) 06:20, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

Barnstar

The Feedback Responder Barnstar
For your great work at feedback dashboard. I hope you will keep on helping newcomers in the future. Torreslfchero (talk) 08:23, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

Creating

Green tickY

I wanted to start by having a subject/heading of Creating Daniel C. Ferguson and then add from there please advise on how to start as I'm very new and would like it to be well done.

Drofmicrocaps (talk) 00:18, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

You said you had a copy of a previous version of the article. Where is it, exactly? I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 00:21, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

I can post it to you but where? I will e-mail you then we can edit it!

Drofmicrocaps (talk) 01:37, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

I think a better place to start would be to post what you have at the article wizard. Let me know when you have posted it. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 02:00, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

Should I post under the name or start with creating?

Drofmicrocaps (talk) 04:38, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

I'm not really sure what you mean-- could you be more specific? If you mean the title, you shouldn't make it "creating," you should name it whatever you think will fit the subject best. I'd recommend "Daniel C. Ferguson." I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 04:40, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

From the title to past it then how should I to finish posting it?

Drofmicrocaps (talk) 05:17, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

I don't know what you should write-- that's really up to you, because it's your article and your interests. I can advise you until I see something concrete. I think the new article wizard should walk you through everything pretty clearly...eventually you should be able to post your submission. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 05:41, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

I can post here and then we can edit it?

Drofmicrocaps (talk) 06:21, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

Hi, I've been working on it over where you said and should I post it and then you comment to me about revisions? Let me know.

08:25, 15 October 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drofmicrocaps (talk • contribs)

  • Yes, please post it. Also, please don't make new headers every time you comment here. You can just post under the same header we've been using above. It is mildly annoying to have to move your comments each time. Thanks, I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 08:29, 15 October 2012 (UTC)


Hi, have you had a chance to review? Also I have a picture as well links to substantiate.

Drofmicrocaps (talk) 18:20, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

  • You still haven't posted an article anywhere as far as I can see, and your descriptions of where the article is are vague. Your contributions do not show that you've posted anything either. Please post a link here. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 18:22, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

Here is the message:

A page with this title has previously been deleted. If you are creating a new page with different content, please continue. If you are recreating a page similar to the previously deleted page, or are unsure, please first contact the deleting administrator using the information provided below. 08:47, 15 October 2012 RHaworth (talk | contribs) deleted page Daniel C. Ferguson (A7: Article about a real person, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject)

Please advise.

Drofmicrocaps (talk) 19:00, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

Hi, I submitted it but it was deleted. should I resubmit and if I do can you give the Powers that be a heads up?

Drofmicrocaps (talk) 22:15, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

Should i start over and sumbit it one more time?

Drofmicrocaps (talk) 17:31, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 October 2012

Thank you

Thank you for taking the time to participate in my RfA. I hope that I will be able to improve based on the feedback I received and become a better editor. AutomaticStrikeout 03:43, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

thanks for your appreciation

i sincerely thank you for your comments . i am glad that i could share my knowledge with wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ujjwalchoudhary18121996 (talk • contribs) 11:58, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, I JethroBT. You have new messages at Wikipedia_talk:Teahouse/Host_lounge.
Message added 00:36, 18 October 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

SarahStierch (talk) 00:36, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

IRC cloak request

Hi there. I am writing to confirm that you are the I Jethrobot who has requested an IRC cloak on freenode. Unfortunately the diff you provided did not give us the necessary confirmation that the IRC account belongs to you. If you have requested a cloak, please make an edit to your userpage, with "IRC cloak request" as an edit summary, and then drop me a note on Meta. Once this is done, I will ensure that your cloak request is processed as quickly as possible. Many thanks, PeterSymonds (talk) 19:14, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Thank you! You are now cloaked. Best wishes, PeterSymonds (talk) 10:29, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

Your Feedback

Appreciate the link you provided and your comments. I will be occupied for the next 24 hrs reading that piece. It's right up my alley, thanks. I guess I'll be in touch if I'm still inept after reading it. All the best, C. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ccard12 (talk • contribs) 05:59, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

Poor Man's Talkback

I replied at my talk. Go Phightins! 15:41, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:I_JethroBT/Archive_5&oldid=1139318531"