User talk:I JethroBT/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions about User:I JethroBT. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
Hi, Jethrobot. About your edits to Game Boy- look, Nintendo's marketing lies sometimes. I saw the link you provided, but unfortunately, it's not correct. The Game Boy (which debuted in 1989) was preceded by the Microvision from Milton Bradley (1979), the Entex Select-A-Game in 1981 and the Epoch Game Pocket Computer in 1984. Nintendo's marketing fluff is just that, fluff.
Ex-Nintendo Employee 06:40, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
Wikimedia Pennsylvania
Hello there!
I'm writing to inform you that we are now forming the first local Wikimedia Chapter in the United States: Wikimedia Pennsylvania. Our goals are to perform outreach and fundraising activities on behalf of the various Wikimedia projects. If you're interested in being a part of the chapter, or just want to know more, you can:
- Contact us on IRC at #wikimedia-pa
- Join our mailing list
- Visit our blog at http://wmfpa.blogspot.com
Thanks and I hope you join up! Cbrown1023 talk 03:24, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
Breath of Fire II
I noticed that you were the one who tagged Breath of Fire II as having a plot summary that is too long. I shortened it somewhat, but didn't what to declare it good myself. Do you think it has satisfied the complaints in the tag? Larrythefunkyferret 06:05, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry for responding so late (4 years!). I think it is much better, and I am glad the tag has long since been removed. :) I Jethrobot (talk) 21:09, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
WikiProject Nintendo Page Redesign
A new page design is being considered for the WikiProject Nintendo page. A rough draft can be viewed here. Please add all comments and thoughts to the discussion. From the automated, Anibot 22:47, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:DragonQuestYangus.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:DragonQuestYangus.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 02:53, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Username
Your username looks like a bot.
I noticed that your account was created in 2006. The username policy might have been changed since then.Curb Chain (talk) 01:08, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
- Oh dear, you are quite right. Thank you for bringing it to my attention. I honestly do like my username though, and I have been making small, but helpful contributions to Wikipedia. I'd like to see if I might be able to keep my username under the grandfather clause mentioned under Wikipedia:Username_policy#Appropriate_usernames. If it doesn't work out though, that's alright. --I Jethrobot (talk) 02:51, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry, wanted to also mention I'm sending a message over to one of the administrators who deals with WP: UAA cases, Daniel Case. I Jethrobot (talk) 02:53, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
- I think you should start a username RFC just to get the community on one page about this. And certainly, if you have to change it, you will be able to keep your history. Daniel Case (talk) 03:12, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
- It was jarring to see an apparent bot !voting in an AFD. I, too encourage you to select a non-bot username, while retaining your history. Edison (talk) 19:10, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
- I disagree that my name is an apparent bot based on, among other things, the notes at the top of my talk and userpages, but you are welcome to comment on the RfC about my username about this. I, Jethrobot drop me a line 19:17, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
- As I said it is jarring when an apparent robot votes in AFD, and other editors have to waste their time to go to your talk page to see the message you refer to. Maybe your signature could note that you are not a robot. That would be an improvement and less disruptive of others efforts working on the encyclopedia than the present sig. Edison (talk) 19:26, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for the suggestion, I've made the appropriate changes. Let me know what you think and consider changing your suggestion on the RfC page if you think this will reduce disruption. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 20:01, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks! Much better. But a name change is still my first choice. I wish I wee clever enough to suggest a modified name you would like. Maybe "User:I Jethronotabot." But that still ends with "bot." Maybe "User:I Jeth-tobor" or "User:I Jethrobo" Edison (talk) 20:09, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
- I agree that an alternative name that I find agreeable and fair to the username rules would be difficult to make, but I appreciate the suggestions. I feel I have made multiple good faith changes during the current RfC discussion. If there is a consensus that my name should be changed, I will without argument (and I would likely choose "Jethrobo"); until then, I think the changes to my pages and signature are sufficient to prevent disruption. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 20:41, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks! Much better. But a name change is still my first choice. I wish I wee clever enough to suggest a modified name you would like. Maybe "User:I Jethronotabot." But that still ends with "bot." Maybe "User:I Jeth-tobor" or "User:I Jethrobo" Edison (talk) 20:09, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for the suggestion, I've made the appropriate changes. Let me know what you think and consider changing your suggestion on the RfC page if you think this will reduce disruption. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 20:01, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
- As I said it is jarring when an apparent robot votes in AFD, and other editors have to waste their time to go to your talk page to see the message you refer to. Maybe your signature could note that you are not a robot. That would be an improvement and less disruptive of others efforts working on the encyclopedia than the present sig. Edison (talk) 19:26, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
- I disagree that my name is an apparent bot based on, among other things, the notes at the top of my talk and userpages, but you are welcome to comment on the RfC about my username about this. I, Jethrobot drop me a line 19:17, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
- It was jarring to see an apparent bot !voting in an AFD. I, too encourage you to select a non-bot username, while retaining your history. Edison (talk) 19:10, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
- I think you should start a username RFC just to get the community on one page about this. And certainly, if you have to change it, you will be able to keep your history. Daniel Case (talk) 03:12, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
DiscoPharma
We thought John Morand producing this exemplified notability, and the reference reliability. If not, how do we delete this? We will remove.Thanks for your help. AnotherGenericUser (talk) 12:27, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
- You shouldn't have removed the Proposed Deletion template as you did so without making any changes to the article. The album is not inherently notable because Johan Morand produced it, and the reference merely shows the album exists, which is not sufficient for notability. Please read the critera for singles at WP:NALBUMS. I will put this up for deletion under [[WP:AFD] as you have contested the proposed deletion. I, Jethrobot drop me a line 16:28, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Discopharma
Hi-
It's fine if deleted. Again, we thought since this was produced by John Morand that was notable, and the source provided is reliable. However, if it's taking away from Wikipedia's standards, let's go ahead and delete it, please. Thank you.AnotherGenericUser (talk) 16:58, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Mashable
I got cranky about the source thing because 99% of the time, people will say "Keep, I found sources X Y and Z" and then the AFD gets closed as keep, but the article's still in dire shape because nobody ever gets around to adding the sources — everyone keeps thinking everyone else will do it. Somebody else's problem and all that. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 23:50, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
vandalism banner
Thanks man I appreciate it! KING OF WIKIPEDIA - GRIM LITTLEZ (talk) 06:43, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
Impaler proposed deletion
Hi I Jethrobot, Just want to comment on your proposed deletion of the Impaler page. Reasons given were "local band with no third party references". I want to point out that Impaler is referenced in Trick of Treat movie Wikipage and Bob Mould's page as well as Combat Records. I hope you would reconsider your opinion of our band's inclusion at Wikipedia. Thanks for your time, Daddyraw666(Daddyraw666 (talk) 13:50, 30 June 2011 (UTC))
Proliferation Security Initiative
Hi, I provided the most recent update to the Proliferation Security Initiative article based on some research I did and some very old/outdated info that was on the page. I got a message saying my feedback was not constuctive. I tried to cite all sources, please let me know what I can do to improve — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.228.192.8 (talk) 22:59, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
- Looks like you did a great job of improving the article. I'm not sure why you decided to contact me though-- I have no involvement with the page. I, Jethrobot drop me a line 23:07, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
Google hoaxes
Same thing I said about Mashable. Don't expect the sources to add themselves. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 00:41, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
Delsorting
Would you mind putting in wikilinks to the discussions when you delsort AfD's into the lists? It's a great help to be able to skip straight to the discussion from the watchlist. Thanks, Jclemens (talk) 01:59, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
- You can look at my vector.js for a script that automatically does this for you. ;) Reaper Eternal (talk) 02:30, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
- HOLY CRAP, are you serious? YOU ARE THE BEST. Do you need to be using vector to use your script? I, Jethrobot drop me a line 05:03, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you! Jclemens (talk) 06:52, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
- I don't think you need to be using vector skin to use the script; just put it in monobook.js if you are using that skin. (And no, it isn't my script—I just use it! [: ) Reaper Eternal (talk) 10:24, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you! Jclemens (talk) 06:52, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
- HOLY CRAP, are you serious? YOU ARE THE BEST. Do you need to be using vector to use your script? I, Jethrobot drop me a line 05:03, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
Just letting you know that I am stepping away from the deletion discussion mentioned above. There seems to be some friction between Ravdag and myself, and his latest edit seems to, at the very least, be aiming assumptions of bad faith at me. --Skamecrazy123 (talk) 12:41, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
- Oh, I totally support your decision. I think you've said what needs to be said. I, Jethrobot drop me a line 17:31, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
- Same here, I am not sure what his problem seems to be, but I think its best for me to step back and let the deletion review take its course. --Skamecrazy123 (talk) 17:38, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
Journal of Performance Measurement
Hello,
I made a few changes to the article regarding The Journal of Performance Measurement. I made changes to some of the language used and added a few outside sources as well. As far as being a notable item, it is a professional journal, rather than academic, that is circulated throughout the world and is the only one of it's kind. It is currently in its 15th year of publication. As stated in the article, many notable names in the investment industry have contributed and been interviewed including to Nobel Prize winners.
Let me know what additional changes I would need to make.
Thank you
Dmost76
Dmost76 (talk) 13:10, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
- Hi Dmost--
- When an article goes up for deletion (ideally), it should be able whether the subject is verifiable and is covered by third-party independent sources to support its notability. I'm glad you took the time to clean up the writing, but the deletion isn't because of the bad writing. Also, there's no doubt the journal is real and that people publish in it, as shown by the articles you've provided in the references. However, these don't qualify for third-party, independent sources, and that's why I nominated it. There are two sources that are potentially independent:
- I can't seem to access the first article as it is for subscribers only and the second one details an award the journal won, which is a good thing for keeping it. This means the article is relying on a single independent source, and it needs to have multiple, reliable sources. If you can find these, add them to the article and let me know here or on the deletion page. Thanks. I, Jethrobot drop me a line 18:32, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
University Challenge
Hi
I've started typing up the results of all the Paxman series of University Challenge. If I'm doing something wrong, then you can give me a hand if you wish. It is hard work. I've just finished the 1998-99 series.
Thanks, Jack — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hogwild94 (talk • contribs) 14:53, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
- Hi Jack,
- Before you do more work for the rest of the series, please read this. I put those tags up because I'm concerned about the notability of the series. All articles on Wikipedia need to fit the general notability guidelines. Can you provide some independent sources that provide some coverage of the event? I, Jethrobot drop me a line 14:57, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi I've been copying out the results from Sean Blanchflower's excellent website, which, with a couple of exceptions, is usually quite reliable. I've been keeping the links at the bottom of the page for reference. I may need to go back and update some pages at some point. Thank's again. Jack Hogwild94 (talk) 15:02, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion converted to PROD: The jerk theory
Hello I Jethrobot, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I have converted the speedy deletion tag that you placed on The jerk theory to a proposed deletion tag. The speedy deletion criteria are extremely narrow to protect the encyclopedia, and do not fit the page in question. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Reaper Eternal (talk) 15:14, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
- Sometimes, you just a get a little WP:OVERZEALOUS. Thanks. I, Jethrobot drop me a line 15:16, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
- That's alright, we all make mistakes! (Just remember that speedy deletions that are not covered by policy are extremely rare, and I have only found one or two of them.) Reaper Eternal (talk) 16:27, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
Japanese transliteration
Hi, I think I am going to delete the article for now. I need to do more research. But what's wrong with my transliteration? Please leave reply on my talk page. cheers! --Avedeus (talk) 15:42, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
- Hi thanks for the reply. Let me see if I can explain a few things.
Japanese Tamil Meaning Comments Dai Ai colloquial reference to excretion. Haven't heard あい|ai used this way before. 糞|ふん|fun or くそ|kuso is one term I know for excrement. I have heard it used like 'shit' as well as 'kuso'. Mei Mai mei means eyes, mai means mascara. 目 (me) is the proper romanization. OOps! kura karu blackened 黒|くろ|kuro is the color name for black. I don't know about "blackened." Kura-i mono, i.e. Kurai shirou (dark castle) Oungaku Oungaram music 音楽|おんがく|ongaku is the correct romanization for music. I have seen both being used, you can look it up if you dont believe me. iru/aru iru to stay/ be present OK ue uyer up OK. kuro karu black OK. Ou Kou King OK. Kara Kara 'empty' in Japanese, 'to extract' in Tamil OK. kiru no koto kiru-ku wathu 'to cut and kill', 'to behead' in Japanese, 'to scratch' or 'to scribble' in Tamil 切るのこと|kiru no koto doesn't seem like it would translate to that. chiisana chinna small it would just be 小さい|chiisai, not 小さいな|chiisaina, which is a phrase where expressing "Don't be small," or expressing doubt that someone is small. CHII-sana, not CHIi-saIna, basically like any other adjective in japanese sugoina hi (great day), kawaina ningyo (cute doll), Aniki Annachi used to refer to gang leader; literally means 'elder brother' OK.
Thanks.
- Soz, yea need more research. --Avedeus (talk) 16:23, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
UC Thought
Hi
After a bit of thought, I've decided not to type out any more series of UC for a while, and stick to publishing the first round fixtures as they come through on the Radio Times website, if that's OK with you.
Thanks again,
Jack Hogwild94 (talk) 18:02, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
- I've actally changed my mind about notability thing. UC is a notable UK show (I had also forgotten my friend is a big fan of it), and reporting of its results would clutter up its mainpage, so you go for it. If you can point me to the website, I can help you out in about a week or so (I will be leaving the country!). I, Jethrobot drop me a line 18:04, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
UC Links
OK, here are some useful links for UC.
http://www.blanchflower.org/uc/ - Detailed (and mostly accurate) results of the Paxman series, compiled by a member of the first Paxman hosted winning team.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b006t6l0 - Main BBC homepage, which publishes the following week's fixture a week in advance.
http://www.radiotimes.com/ - All round TV guide which should publish the fixtures two weeks in advance.
OK, hope that helps. Been nice negotiating with you. Keep up the good work!
Jack Hogwild94 (talk) 18:32, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
Andrew Bloch
Hi there
Hope that all is well with you.
I wanted to get in touch for some advice. I've tried twice to get a small article up about Andrew Bloch as stakeholders keep wondering why there is not one when there are so many analogous entries for similar agency founders. I'm sure not perfect or an expert in the ways of Wikipedia, but I try to be honest and do it right and most of my articles are left unmolested except for a few edits here and there. Do you have any advice for getting an article up in a stable state approved of by the community. I was accused of bad faith, but then Ravenswing and others came in the same breath to call me corrupt and state that trade media references are irrelevant. It was deleted by Cirt, who seems to be an editor of come controversy. Any advice, thoughts and help much appreciated.
Jay — Preceding unsigned comment added by JaySorrels (talk • contribs) 09:19, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
- Hey Jay, sorry to take so long to get back to you.
- I'm a little fuzzy on what sources were available for Bloch exactly, but I remember it wasn't exactly ideal coverage. I thought the PR pieces were pretty good, and I thought there was an interview or two. There was a lot about his company, and less about Bloch himself. If there are analogous entries, that are not well sourced or do not provide sources with independent and in-depth coverage, then they should probably be deleted too. The fact that other stuff exists on Wikipedia is not always the most effective argument to make in deletion discussion. You can consider bringing the article to Deletion Review where editors can review whether the deletion was fair or not. Let me know if you decide to start one, and I will likely comment there. I, Jethrobot drop me a line 05:32, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
- Also, I don't know much about the situation about Cirt, so I'm not at liberty to comment on it. I, Jethrobot drop me a line 05:36, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
Changing licensing info on a submitted photo
Hi, I have a question for you. A friend of mine submitted a photo from a magazine to an article. Now he needs to change the licensing info of the photo. But there is so much info to go over, he is confused on how to do it. Can you do it for him? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikiman153 (talk • contribs) 15:52, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
- I'm actually not well-trained in licensing of photos, so I don't know much about it either. I, Jethrobot drop me a line 21:40, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eatyourkimchi
I saw that you had added Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eatyourkimchi to the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Could you please add it to whatever Korea list there is too? I'd do it myself but I'm not sure how. Cloveapple (talk) 18:38, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
- No probs. I, Jethrobot drop me a line 18:39, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks :) Cloveapple (talk) 18:48, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
- Anytime! :D I, Jethrobot drop me a line 19:06, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks :) Cloveapple (talk) 18:48, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
portsmouth fc #13
On facebook the official portsmouth page sed that Alessandro Zamperini and Lassina Diabate have worn number 13 after aaron's death. here are the links to prove it: http://en.eufo.de/football/squad/portsmouth-fc/2002-03 (DIABETE)
I cant find a link for (ZAMPERINI) but this conversation will show you what the official pompey facebook page said (read the comments):
||||||||||||||||||||| Andy 'Fox' Seymour why does Henderson have squad number 13 when it was retired following Aaron Flahavan's death as a mark of respect? It's not on! 3 hours ago ·LikeUnlike ·2 people like this..
Matt Smith I think it was retired for the following season after his death only 2 hours ago · LikeUnlike.
Andy 'Fox' Seymour no. it was indefinate because no player's had that number since 2 hours ago · LikeUnlike.
Portsmouth Football Club The number wasn't retired - both Zamperini and Diabate have worn it since Aaron's death 2 hours ago · LikeUnlike.
Portsmouth Football Club The number 1 shirt was retired for one season 2 hours ago · LikeUnlike.
Phil Stafford I thought redknapp didn't pick the number because he was superstitious when he was I charge??about an hour ago · LikeUnlike.
Stephen Lee It was the number 1 shirtabout an hour ago · LikeUnlike. |||||||||||||||||||||||
You can check this on the page if u dont believe me! I am a massive pompey fan and i was trying to help wikipedia. sorry for confusing you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.119.132.128 (talk) 20:19, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
- I reverted your change because you got rid of a source and information without saying why (you should provide an edit summary for what you are doing when you edit articles, especially when removing references). Facebook is not a reliable source for verifying information because it is user-generated, so that source on Zamperini won't work. However, the reference for Diabate should work. I'm not sure why you deleted the information, though. The article clearly states that 13 was worn by others after Flahavan, and so it wasn't actually retired. I, Jethrobot drop me a line 21:39, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
eHow
That google chrome plugin was created specifically for websites like eHow, which fill the web with annoying spam.
Furthermore, there is a section marked "criticisms" that discusses the reactions of other webbrowser creators. I see no reason why Google's reaction should be omitted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.32.146.126 (talk) 06:28, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
- It's fine if you want to say the google chrome made a plugin and provide a source other than a link to download the application, but Wikipedia is not the place to promote the plugin by linking to it, especially not on the article about EHow. It basically sends a message to readers that, "hey, you can download this app to block results from the website you're reading about on Wikipedia!" Wikipedia is not about promoting products, even if it is related to the criticism. I, Jethrobot drop me a line 06:34, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
Human Skin Color
Good Morning Mr. Jethrobot,
I'm sorry for what happened on the Human Skin Color edit page, but it is a shame that people can add sources that say the opposite of what they want to prove. The user that insists to put East Asian people in Fitzpatrick type II adding sources that say that East Asians belong to phototype IV and VI must be an East Asian supremacist, a racist or a 7 years old boy. Please, don't let he modify anything. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.30.76.233 (talk) 07:37, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
bloom consulting ranking page
Why you put this page for speedly deletion? It's not useful and objective, because it is the same information as in bloom consulting main page only now it is in separate page, it's better if there will be more information to add.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Martaliepa (talk • contribs) 09:44, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
- I put it there because no provided no sources to verify any of the information. And before you say it, no, the bloom consulting main page won't suffice as a source to support its notability. Also, you copied this from a website? That would be copyright infringement, which is also a no-no on Wikipedia. I, Jethrobot drop me a line 09:48, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
but it's useful to wait few days, until article is devloped, and I'm a not the one who create the article/ new page... just let person to finish the page, it's not so easy expecially for begginers.. Martaliepa (talk) 09:53, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
heat-shrinkable sleeves
Dear Sir,
You proposed to delete the page for heat-shrinkable sleeves. Please confirm why. The technology is in wide use for pipeline construction (corrosion protection) for the past 40 years. There are also many national and international standards that reference the technology and many multi-national oil and gas companies that have specifications that include the technology.
Thank you, Bob Buchanan Canusa-CPS — Preceding unsigned comment added by Canusa-CPS (talk • contribs) 13:12, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
- Well, I wrote why on the proposed deletion template. Here it is again:
- Product intended to prevent corrosion in pipelines lacks reliable, third-party sources and does not meet the general notability guidelines.
- Basically what this means is that Wikipedia pages for products such as this one need to have multiple, independent sources that discuss the product in-depth. This means that websites of companies that make the product are not valid, because they are not independent of the subject matter. The article you mentioned, found this article you listed doesn't even mention "heat-shrinkable sleeves," so it's not valid for use on this article. I also don't understand what the references "ISO 21809-3, EN 12068, DIN 30678, and NACE SP 0303" are supposed to mean (I assume it is registration info), but they're not linked to anything.
- A second problem is that you have a conflict of interest as your username seems to imply some affilitation with the company that created heat-shrinkable sleeves. Editors are advised not to create articles about a product they own or about themselves as it is difficult for them to remain unbiased. Please read more at WP:COI to see what I mean.
- Finally, because you have objected to the proposed deletion without actually improving the article, I am going to put this article in the articles for deletion. I was unable to find anything myself (e.g. this article mentions the product, but is more about the company than the product). If you can find sources that support the notability of the product, I would suggest adding them to the article and discussing them at the AfD discussion. I, Jethrobot drop me a line 16:01, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
- Since I am not a regular Wikiperson I don't get the finer points and protocol of how to make the page better, so thanks for helping out. Can we agree to make the improvements jointly? The references are Internation Standards and obviously I didn't provide the proper links. Also, I didn't add in the articles - they came from someone else. The Huntsville article you located was from a local newspaper where our manufacturing plant is located and not suitable for this forum. At the end of this message, I have attached a few links. If you would be so kind as to look at this links and let me know, a) would they make the page better and b) how to add them. Please note that the standards are publically available standards but are sold by the SRO that produces them. The articles are mostly written by myself and posted on our company's website but the articles are non-biased. Perhaps there is a way to post them in a neutral site. Thanks, Bob
- Standards that include requirements for heat-shrinkable sleeves:
- ISO 21809-3 http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=37532
- EN 12068 http://www.techstreet.com/cgi-bin/results?searchText=EN%2012068;sid=goog;gclid=CJS79ZfLi6oCFcTe4AodVQ6rzQ
- DIN 30678 http://www.techstreet.com/standards/din/30670?product_id=42089
- NACE SP 0303 http://web.nace.org/Departments/store/Product.aspx?id=f0946120-d1dc-4580-843e-ed1f18ecc7b2
- Standards that include requirements for heat-shrinkable sleeves:
- Articles:
- Several articles available for download at this page: http://www.shrinksleeves.com/reference/articles.htm
- Recently published article that includes a reference to heat-shrinkable sleeves: http://www.napipelines.com/featured/2011/2011-05-feature-2.html
- Articles:
- Techical Papers:
- A few available for download at this page: http://www.shrinksleeves.com/reference/tech_papers.htm — Preceding unsigned comment added by Canusa-CPS (talk • contribs) 19:25, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
- Can you add these sources to the AfD Discussion as well? I, Jethrobot drop me a line 19:31, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
- Techical Papers:
New user name needed maybe, but promotional only? Quite bitey IMO and more of introducing self than anything promotional. Also may be part of Outreach:ACIP. Thoughts? Calmer Waters 22:52, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
- Hm, probably was a bit premature. Thanks for undoing it. Still, I'm going to be watching the user for edits relating to their organization. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 23:17, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
- It's fine. Just wanted you to understand why I may have declined the speedy and removed the warning. Take care. Kindly Calmer Waters 23:29, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
- Um, User Amatulic just blocked the user right after our conversation. Just wanted to let you know. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 00:31, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah, I saw that also. Calmer Waters 00:38, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
- Um, User Amatulic just blocked the user right after our conversation. Just wanted to let you know. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 00:31, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
- It's fine. Just wanted you to understand why I may have declined the speedy and removed the warning. Take care. Kindly Calmer Waters 23:29, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
I've declined your speedy as it isn't about a real person (or group of them). A7 is for real people (and webcontent, for some strange reason), but these are Xbox thingies (characters?). I'd suggest PROD. I could be totally wrong - feel free to argue. Peridon (talk) 18:35, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
- PROD is fine by me. They are indeed XBox characters. There are several problems with the page, but mostly that it is in-game content, but they did actually include links, so I guess speedy deletion is out of the question. It seems weird that A7 would included web content; I sort of wish it would include general fictional content. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 18:50, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
Username allowed
Hello, I Jethrobot. The result of this discussion was to allow your username. The discussion has now been closed. If you would like to see what concerns were raised, you can find a link to the discussion in the archive. You do not need to change your username. Thank you. Doug.(talk • contribs) 19:37, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for closing and providing an fair summary of the debate. *Throws a personal dance party* I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 20:41, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
- Move which conversation where? Are you trying to move this somewhere near the top of your page or trying to move it to my page because of my tag saying that's the way I prefer conversations unified? If the former, let me know and I'll try to help you; if the latter please don't bother. I used to do that but nowadays I don't really very often and ought to remove that message. And you don't use the move button for that, it won't let you since you'd have to delete my talk page - if you were an admin it would let you! I should probably clarify that it's a copy/paste move (you have to leave edit summaries saying where it came from/where it's going).--Doug.(talk • contribs) 20:51, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
- It was the latter, so don't worry about it I guess. You probably should remove that tag, as it can be confusing for users as most don't move conversations back and forth that I've seen. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 21:05, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
- You might want to change the link on your userpage to the permanent revision, so when it gets moved the link won't rot. --Σ talkcontribs 22:23, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks. I actually tried to figure out what this was based on information on the main RfC page and archived discussions, but I wasn't able to figure it out based on those URLs. Could you let me know what the permalink is? I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 22:29, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
- This. Note that at the top, there is a red bar with information. The page can be accessed by going to the page history and clicking on the date of a revision you want. --Σ talkcontribs 22:35, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
- Oh, duh. Why didn't I realize that? Thanks a bunch. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 22:41, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
- This. Note that at the top, there is a red bar with information. The page can be accessed by going to the page history and clicking on the date of a revision you want. --Σ talkcontribs 22:35, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
- I tried to include the permalink in the notice when I posted but alas, the template doesn't perform as advertised. I will try to fix it soon. --Doug.(talk • contribs) 14:04, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks. I actually tried to figure out what this was based on information on the main RfC page and archived discussions, but I wasn't able to figure it out based on those URLs. Could you let me know what the permalink is? I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 22:29, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
- You might want to change the link on your userpage to the permanent revision, so when it gets moved the link won't rot. --Σ talkcontribs 22:23, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
- It was the latter, so don't worry about it I guess. You probably should remove that tag, as it can be confusing for users as most don't move conversations back and forth that I've seen. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 21:05, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
- Move which conversation where? Are you trying to move this somewhere near the top of your page or trying to move it to my page because of my tag saying that's the way I prefer conversations unified? If the former, let me know and I'll try to help you; if the latter please don't bother. I used to do that but nowadays I don't really very often and ought to remove that message. And you don't use the move button for that, it won't let you since you'd have to delete my talk page - if you were an admin it would let you! I should probably clarify that it's a copy/paste move (you have to leave edit summaries saying where it came from/where it's going).--Doug.(talk • contribs) 20:51, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
Request for ACC account creation interface
I requested an account on the ACC account creation interface. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 22:18, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
- Hi, I'm a user of the ACC tool. Please note that since I'm not a tool admin, I don't have the power to accept or decline your request. However, I've seen your interest in helping with account creation, so I suggest that you come to #wikipedia-en-accounts connect on IRC and chat with us for a bit. Thanks! — Waterfox ~talk~ 22:27, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
- User:I Jethrobot thank you for applying to access the account creation tool. Prodego has approved your request so welcome to the team. You may now access the tool here. Before you do so, please read the tool's guide thoroughly to familiarize yourself with the process.You should also join #wikipedia-en-accounts on IRC where a bot informs us when new account requests come in and to get any advice on requests as well as the mailing list. Please note that we have implemented a policy of zero tolerance on mishandled requests, and that failure to assess correctly will result in suspension. I would like to emphasize that it is not a race to complete a request, and each one should be handled diligently and thoroughly.Currently you are allowed to create up to six accounts per day, although you won't be able to create an account with a similar name to that of another user; these requests are marked "Account Creator Needed" by the bot and "Flagged user needed" in the tool. However, if you reach the limit frequently, you can request the account creator permission at WP:PERM.Please keep in mind that the ACC tool is a powerful program, and misuse will result in your access being suspended by a tool administrator. Don't hesitate to get in touch with me if you have any questions. Thank you for participating in the account creation process. Again welcome!
Mlpearc powwow 04:39, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
- I have promoted you to administrator on the sandbox. — Waterfox ~talk~ 13:45, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
Nelson Quan
Nelson quan AFD should be withdrawn so the article can be redirected to Nelson Quan. New editor created two articles by mistake, and Nelson Quan has a little more meat on it. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 19:01, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for bringing this to my attention. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 20:16, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
John J. Powers (comedian)
Jkinzler777 (talk) 19:28, 21 July 2011 (UTC)--Jkinzler777 (talk) 19:28, 21 July 2011 (UTC)Hello, I wanted to thank you for your comments to my article. I appreciate it alot. I am going to reduce it to one simple paragraph, then as it survives deletion, add another paragraph. Does that make sense to you? Thanks.
- You're welcome for the comments, but I'm afraid your solution isn't going to work. Reducing the article isn't the issue here. It's whether John J. Powers as a person and entertainer fulfills the criteria for notability (read those links for what those criteria are. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 20:18, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
Help with Human Skin Color article. Very important
I pray you Jethrobot to forbid the user 111.94.228.121 to modify the position of East Asian in Phototype II. The sources added by user 111.94.228.121 say that East Asian People belong to Phototype IV (see Sources 52, 53, 54 in notes)but he put East Asian in Phototype II. I corrected the error committed by user 111.94.228.121 and I tell him that his sources say the opposite of what he asserts. Now, I'm wondering if he can read or understand English... I don't know... but I'm sure that he is in error (see his sources). So, I ask your help to lock the East Asian position in Phototype IV in the article. Also scientifical articles and essays (see Jablonski and Chaplin) say that skin reflectance of Europeans (also Southern Europeans) is higher (so the europeans' skin is lighter) than that of East Asian (Japanese people have values very similar to those of Philipino people and Vietnamese people): Europeans range is from 62 to 67, East Asian range is from 53 to 59.
Thanks for attention, regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.6.103.221 (talk) 22:09, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
- I can't lock other users (I'm just a regular user). You'll want to bring this up on the article's talk page first. If that doesn't work, then you should consider bringing this topic to Request for Comments or Dispute Resolution. Good luck, I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 09:03, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions about User:I JethroBT. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
Speedy deletion contested: Hiren's BootCD
Hello I Jethrobot. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Hiren's BootCD, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Speedily deleted articles are not covered by G4. Thank you. --Σ talkcontribs 07:05, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
- But, there was a previous AfD for the subject, which is why I nominated it. The article doesn't look substantially improved based on that discussion. I was also going to say it was blatant advertising. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 07:09, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
- Nevermind. I'm an idiot. (trouts self) I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 07:09, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
DYK notice
You put a notice on my talk page about DYK and I can not figure out why.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 19:55, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry, I wrote a comment on there a while ago clarifying your nomination (David Baker (poker player, born 1986), David Baker (poker player, born c. 1970s)). Some time later, I mistakenly remembered asking you a question about it (I had done this on another DYK), so I left a talkback on your page because DYK updates quite often and it seems easy to miss a message. Anyway, my bad. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 20:14, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
DYK issue with Wheeler–Stallard House resolved
I have added the source for that statement from the the article about the ski lift (It was sort of tangential to the hook, but whatever ...) Also, you can use {{DYKproblem}} specifically for that purpose instead of {{talkback}}. Daniel Case (talk) 04:38, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
Thought I'd return the favour
SwisterTwister has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can Spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!
SwisterTwister talk 06:52, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
Psychedelic Festival
Greetings Jethrobot , thanks for everything im dropping you a line as you request , i was never an editor so im still have a few problems with some coding things and trying to talk to you haha ! thanksss ! drop me a line , nice to meet you digitaly - good day , cheers from Brazil >.< — Preceding unsigned comment added by Startigenix (talk • contribs) 09:37, 24 July 2011 (UTC) Startigenix
- Hey, don't thank me. Thank the editor who improved the article. If you need help with something about editing articles or participating on articles for deletion discussions, let me know and I can point you in the right direction. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 17:51, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
Therapy
Excuse me mister you have no right to delete my page filled with hard work.
Can you at least give me the content of the deleted page just for me to have?
Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobthecucumber (talk • contribs) 14:43, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
- I'm not sure what page you're talking about. I also don't recall deleting any pages that you worked on. Also, keep in mind that content on Wikipedia doesn't belong to anyone. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 17:48, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
- As a bit of a coincidence, it was me. I've just looked up your contribs, and it wasn't even tagged by I Jethrobot. I'm not prepared to undelete it, sorry. Some other admin might, you never know your luck. As it stood, it would just be deleted again. My apologies to the resident here - I thought it best to reply here to keep things together. Peridon (talk) 21:12, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
Not anymore
Just a tip - when a user blanks their own creation (and no-one else has done anything much to it other than cats, typos etc), tag it G7. If they then revert you and put it back, don't fuss - just tag it whatever suits or leave it if it looks OK. Peridon (talk) 21:05, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
An invitation
Sometimes a film article is on the brink and almost but not quite ready (see WP:NotJustYet), and per WP:ATD a short term incubation while real-world events progress is worth considering. An example of one that could grow would be Jack (2011 film) which has a great deal of untapped sourcing availble giving it the potential for improvement through collaborative editing off of mainspace in the Incubator... and another example would be the already well-sourced Nephilim (film) which simply had no other place to which it could be redirected or merged. And so while yes, films in the planning stages generally do not merit their own articles, there many instances per WP:FUTURE when it IS suitable to have at least some sourced information about a planned film included in a related article (an example being the "planned" Lincoln (2012 film) which has enough persistant coverage to be worth including in the Speilberg article's section Steven Spielberg#Upcoming and announced projects), we actually do allow an occasional rare exception. Please have a look at WP:Planned Films. Best, Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 08:32, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
- And to note, your input there would be most welcome. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 18:17, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
- Invitation accepted, and I agree with your sentiments. Thanks for taking the time to explain your arguments rather well (and for your good faith efforts to search for sources, a habit that is sadly lacking in many AfDs). I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 18:39, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
- Then perhaps you might also wish to offer input about User:MichaelQSchmidt/Newcomer's guide to guidelines, an essay I hope to take live within a week. :) Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 18:45, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
- Gladly! You can expect some feedback sometime this evening. (Also, what an ambitious undertaking!) I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 18:47, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
- While there are a number of different tutorials on WP, they are spread all over the place, and many are written to be understood ony by someone versed in interpreting tax code (chuckle). My own introduction to the project was like learning to speak a foreign language. After three years I am more fluent, but still learning. So seeing a problem, I sought a solution: A one-stop shop where newcomers wishing to contribute should be able to get a heads-up. :) Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 20:01, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
- Gladly! You can expect some feedback sometime this evening. (Also, what an ambitious undertaking!) I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 18:47, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
- Then perhaps you might also wish to offer input about User:MichaelQSchmidt/Newcomer's guide to guidelines, an essay I hope to take live within a week. :) Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 18:45, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
- Invitation accepted, and I agree with your sentiments. Thanks for taking the time to explain your arguments rather well (and for your good faith efforts to search for sources, a habit that is sadly lacking in many AfDs). I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 18:39, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 18:21, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
United States Air Force
My grandfather was a fighter pilot, my father was a fighter pilot, and I am a fighter pilot. My post is completely acceptable and truthful. It is just as acceptable as a liberal blog that blasts Air Force ethics. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.219.243.154 (talk) 02:51, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
Thank you kindly
Thank you for your support | |
Thank you for your question and support at my RfA. I will endeavor to live up to your and the community's expectations of me. Qwyrxian (talk) 07:06, 26 July 2011 (UTC) |
Pointless friction, social lubrication
I, J;
It's possible I over-reacted to your comments on my talk page. *scuffs ground with toe, whistles skyward* If I haven't yet answered any questions you have, please do come back and ask me for more details, I'll try not to be so prickly.
Aaron Brenneman (talk) 04:00, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
- I do have questions, but first, thanks for inviting further discussion. It's a mark of a good Wikipedian, in my book. :) I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 04:04, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
Cool. Well, I will start editing that page this weekend (I hope), then if I need something I'll ask you for sure. As I said, I'm going to "copy" the Kunio-kun page (List of games Section). Game title, release date and two lines or so about the game. English is not my mother tongue so it pretty sucks when it comes to writing. Maybe you can edit the characters section and also the summary/introduction.
Giving you an example, there were three useless pages about games of J.League Excite Stage (series), but I merged them all in a single page, looks better now, still under construction though, so please don't add those notability templates.
"if an article like this... is deleted, then I think we have a big problem in here, because then you would have to be COHERENT and delete 75% of the wiki video game articles out there"
I, Jethrobot, it's not "all or nothing", what I meant was... you have to agree with me that there are hundreds or thousands of shitty wiki-articles about video games... but no one gives a sh*t. it is a "problem" for sure.
"If I left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it." >> I only read it now, sorry. --Hydao (talk) 04:17, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
- No probs. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 04:45, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
Greetings
Hello there Jethro, hello there Robot,
I admit I was taken aback a bit when I first noticed your username. Then, when I saw that there was a debate about your username, I was inclined, at first, to speak out against it. Then, I thought to myself, "hey, this a moderately clever construction, and, perhaps, I ought to withhold quick judgement and think about it". So, I waited and observed your contributions. You seem, to me, to be a useful, thoughtful and constructive contributor. So, I welcome you and wish you well. I also note the disclaimer in your current signature. That's a good idea too. I hope and expect that you will be a positive contributor for a long time to come. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 06:06, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you SO MUCH for my very first welcome message (and I've been a user since 2006)! And thanks for your "wait and see" attitude toward my contributions. I realize this can be a hard thing to do, especially given a immediatist editing attitude that prevails on Wikipedia (which is not necessarily a bad thing). Anyway, thanks for swinging by and dropping me your message. It means a lot! Hope to see you around more. :) I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 06:30, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
- You are welcome, and I appreciate your warm reply. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 03:22, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
Archiving your talk page
Maybe you should consider archiving your talk page. — Waterfox ~talk~ 01:47, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
- I have an automated script running from MiszaBot, but it doesn't seem to have started yet, despite my playing around with the parameters. I'll just cut and paste. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 02:14, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
Sustenance
Thecheesykid has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can Spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!
That Ole Cheesy Dude (Talk to the hand!) 05:30, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
Anarchist Stamp
[3]. Black Kite (t) (c) 10:37, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
your thoughts please :-)
Hi JethroNoBot ;-) , could you please have a look at this issue and share your thoughts on it? Thanks --DeVerm (talk) 18:23, 30 July 2011 (UTC).
- Ha ha. :) I've left a response on your page with my suggestions. 19:26, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
I have edited the relevant section of WP:UNAME about bots to account for the exception made for your username. I thought I would check to see if you approved. Interchangeable|talk to me|what I've changed 19:55, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah, I think this is a fair change. Thanks for taking the time to do so! However, (in the interest of not giving me undue attention) I think there are other exceptions that are worth noting in names like "Talbot" or "Cabot" where -bot comes up naturally in a last name. I can make this change, as well. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 20:10, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Leon Daniel
On 2 August 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Leon Daniel, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that journalist Leon Daniel was one of the few reporters to remain in Vietnam after the fall of Saigon? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |