User talk:IGTMIMCigam

Welcome!

Hello, IGTMIMCigam, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking

if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 12:52, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review • Featured content
Miscellaneous
User pages • Talk pages Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

April 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Uber Facts has been reverted.
Your edit here to Uber Facts was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://factually.gizmodo.com/uberfacts-isnt-steaming-hot-garbage-anymore-1695943142) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 12:52, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Uber Facts

Hello IGTMIMCigam,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Uber Facts for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Nicky mathew (talk) 14:16, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Uber Facts

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Uber Facts, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jbh (talk) 15:58, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Carl's Jr.— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Serols (talk) 15:58, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Carl's Jr., you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 16:03, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to McGriddles. Serols (talk) 16:04, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 16:10, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Request for unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

IGTMIMCigam (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

@Favonian: I realized last year that I engaged in some childish vandalism that lead me to getting indeffed. Well, after a year later, I've done some growing up and realized that defacing pages is immature. It's something I should not have done and I regret it. My motivation behind vandalism is that I thought it was funny back then, but now that I'm older and look back on it, I now realize that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia host and all contributors should remain constructive and have good intentions - specifically a goal to build the community. That said, I am willing to make productive edits to Wikipedia, such as formatting fixation, removing misleading categories and adding correct ones, removing false information, and just remaining a good contributor in general. And of course, I will refrain from vandalism and childish behavior. IGTMIMCigam (talk) 08:27, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

See below. Considering the vandalism within the last week alone, this request would have to be significantly modified, and made well into the future, to have any non-zero chance of success. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 10:35, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Widr Is there anything in particular you would like to see for an unblock here? 331dot (talk) 08:38, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Zzuuzz, can you check this one, please. I'm pretty sure this is LTA, judging from the articles they were messing with. Widr (talk) 20:56, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Widr: Everything says Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/WhenDatHotlineBling/Archive -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 21:05, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That was my impression too. Thanks. Widr (talk) 21:09, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]