User talk:IAmSaaki

Speedy deletion nomination of Saaki

Hello IAmSaaki,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Saaki for deletion, because it seems to be vandalism or a hoax.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Jonathanarpith (talk) 06:26, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I see no obvious reason to think that this article was "vandalism or a hoax", nut there were other problems with it: see below. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:32, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Saaki has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for this specific type of article, you may want to check out our criterion for biographies. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:32, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not write or add to an article about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:32, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please don’t mark it delete. I am creating real person’s page with authentic references. IAmSaaki (talk) 15:29, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Karan Darra (April 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dreamy Jazz were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Karan Darra and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Karan Darra, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dreamy Jazz 🎷 ^{talk to me | my contributions} 14:41, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, IAmSaaki! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dreamy Jazz 🎷 ^{talk to me | my contributions} 14:41, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:IAmSaaki/sandbox

Hello, IAmSaaki. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, User:IAmSaaki/sandbox.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:34, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Pehlipora concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Pehlipora, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Pehlipora

Hello, IAmSaaki. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Pehlipora".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:32, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Narbal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Indian and Block

Beerwah, Jammu and Kashmir (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Beerwah

Khag, Jammu and Kashmir (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Indian

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:35, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Gulmarg, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 15:43, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 13

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Khag, Jammu and Kashmir (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Indian

Narbal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Indian

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:46, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Gotitbro (talk) 19:03, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To add to the above comments -- if your edits are undone by another user, please do not just go and make the same edit again. That is considered hostile behavior on Wikipedia, and your second attempt will be rolled back without discussion. Instead, as Gotitbro suggested above, you should engage in a discussion with the editor who reversed your initial edits, or go to one of the other venues they suggested. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 00:09, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Saaki moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Saaki, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. KylieTastic (talk) 10:34, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for letting me know. I am just bringing all the valid references for this article. Hope i will get it. Thanks IAmSaaki (talk) 10:38, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Tosa Maidan. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 15:52, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ARBIPA sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Kautilya3 (talk) 16:51, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding this topic i have proper knowledge. So if I need help i will contact you. Thanks IAmSaaki (talk) 17:16, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indian-administered

Please consult the archives of WT:INDIA for the current consensus on where to add "Indian-administered" and "Pakistan-administered" in the Wiki pages. You should not willy nilly add it at other places without reaching consensus first. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 16:53, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As @Kautilya3: has pointed out above. There is no consensus to add “administered” in Kashmir related topics, the only places where there is consensus for it is in the lead sentence of top level administrative unit articles of the region, i.e., Jammu and Kashmir, Azad Kashmir etc. and that too in a very specific sentence. You have already been reverted by multiple editors yet you continue to edit war. I am hard pressed to not assume good faith and such edit warring is only going to end up as a block. Gotitbro (talk) 19:48, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think you are not aware or you don’t study about Kashmir. Kashmir is not the part of India or Pakistan or China. It’s occupied by 3 countries. That’s why we use Indian administered Kashmir or Pakistani administered Kashmir or China administered Kashmir. So pls don’t remove Indian administered or Pakistan administered. Hope you got it. Thanks IAmSaaki (talk) 19:55, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think you are not aware of important Wikipedia policies, including WP:CONSENSUS. The issue of how to describe topics relating to Kashmir has been the subject of extensive discussions among editors. You do not get to ignore those past discussions just because you think you know more about the topic than anyone else. If you think the consensus needs to be changed, you need to participate in discussions, not ignore them. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 21:09, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Respected Sir, We never use to write Indian union territory of Jammu and Kashmir. We know according to UNO Jammu and Kashmir is not the part of India neither its the union territory of India that’s why instead of Indian union territory of Jammu and Kashmir we write Indian administered union territory of Jammu and Kashmir. Thanks Regards Saaki

IAmSaaki (talk) 22:28, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello IAmSaaki, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Kh. Abdul Samad Wani have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Money emoji💵^{Talk💸Help out at CCI!} 17:24, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I want to edited it again pls help me in that. Hope that. IAmSaaki (talk) 17:47, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit reversion

In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.S Philbrick (Talk) 18:00, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mirrors

Thanks for contributing to the article Kh. Abdul Samad Wani. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable and attributed to reliable sources. You have recently used citations which copied, or mirrored, material from Wikipedia. This leads to a circular reference and is not acceptable. Most mirrors are clearly labeled as such, but some are in violation of our license and do not provide the correct attribution. Please help by adding alternate sources to the article you edited! If you need any help or clarification, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Thank you. Kuru (talk) 18:16, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, you been notified that your reference to enacademic is a copy of the page as it used to exist on Wikipedia. You're also labeling this as "Forbes" when it has nothing to do with them. I'm sorry if I was not clear: if you use another reference that you know is fake, I will block this account. Kuru (talk) 02:42, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, almost every iteration of that page included direct copies of the Dawn article. I've deleted the page. Kuru (talk) 02:45, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Will you help me in creating this page IAmSaaki (talk) 07:29, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Respected Sir, i want to create this page because this page was already on Wikipedia few years back and he is very famous person and a famous public figure. I am trying my best to find authentic references for this page. So pls help me in that. You said I will block this account I want to know why you want to block my account, instead of block account you show guide me so that I would be better writer like you. Hope you will help me. Thanks IAmSaaki (talk) 08:39, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, you don't seem to be reading the feedback given to you. Do not use fake references. Do not copy material from other sources. Kuru (talk) 13:38, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Kuru Sir, hope i am leaning something from you. IAmSaaki (talk) 13:48, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kh. Abdul Samad Wani

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kh. Abdul Samad Wani requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Tatupiplu'^talk 14:28, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tyndale Biscoe School, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kashmiri (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:18, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Saaki

Hello, IAmSaaki. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Saaki".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:00, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:47, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Saaki

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Saaki requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.linkedin.com/in/saakiofficial/?originalSubdomain=in and https://saakiofficial.blogspot.com/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 2A01:4C8:A1:F08E:69AA:AD25:80F8:B9C5 (talk) 14:17, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article, or a draft for a Wikipedia article, about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:43, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Saaki

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Saaki, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 2A01:4C8:A1:F08E:69AA:AD25:80F8:B9C5 (talk) 15:20, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Saaki

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Saaki requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 2A01:4C8:A1:F08E:69AA:AD25:80F8:B9C5 (talk) 17:17, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Saaki. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. 2A01:4C8:A1:F08E:69AA:AD25:80F8:B9C5 (talk) 17:27, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Saaki has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:20, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Saaki

Hello, IAmSaaki,

If you want there to be an article on this person, do not post a request on a protected talk page (which will just get deleted), try creating a Draft article and submit it for approval to Articles for Creation. Do not violate Wikipedia's guidelines on copyright or it will be deleted, too.

If you have questions about this, bring them to the Teahouse. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:00, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please help me to creating page on Saaki who is new actor in Indian film industry IAmSaaki (talk) 20:23, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

IAmSaaki, I strongly advise you to forget about that – if there are any more attempts to create that page you are very likely to find yourself prevented from further editing, either for disruptive editing or for promotion (or perhaps for both). If there are other pages you want to contribute to, please do so, but please leave this topic alone from now on. Thanks, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:48, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And I will just add that you will also be blocked if you try to copy and paste content from other sources into Wikipedia unless there is already a clear and obvious Creative Commons Commercial Licence on the source pages. Without that licence (and even if you wrote it) you may not reuse it here simply by pasting it in. See WP:COPYVIO and WP:TOOSOON. Thank you. Nick Moyes (talk) 21:43, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Surayya Tyabji while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Storchy (talk) 05:29, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Flag of India, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and/or verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. Swapnil1101 (talk) 13:38, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gulmarg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tosa Maidan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Hello, IAmSaaki, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as User:169.149.193.251 ⋅ (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you.

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Sri Pratap Higher Secondary School, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 16:21, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Tyndale Biscoe School, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 16:21, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please don’t try to give me threat. Otherwise i am going to lodge FIR against you in Cyber Police. I am giving you last and final warning don’t try to threat me or don’t try to block me. If you continuously try to defame me on social media which can damage, injure, harm and destroy my reputation through your public message on Wikipedia then I will surely file defarmation suit against you and will demand unconditional apology and RS 50 lakh damages. you will also get jail for 2 years plus fine under the section 500 of the Indian Penal Code. Which is called punishment for defamation. Whatever I mentioned on Wikipedia page is authentic the thing is I don’t know how to write on Wikipedia. Otherwise Whatever i wrote is authentic. Thanks.

Saaki

Actor/Politician 169.149.194.61 (talk) 16:48, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]