User talk:IAMTHEPEOPLESCHAMP

Unblocked, sorry. -- Curps 21:49, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stop blanking talk pages

~~Please do not remove comments from article talk pages. It is considered vandalism. Thank you. Tufflaw 04:01, 9 February 2006 (UTC)~~ My apologies - I misread this diff [1], that talk page has become a disaster. Sorry about the misunderstanding. Tufflaw 21:19, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea what you are talking about.

What talk page did I remove comments from? I do not recall doing anything like this. What page did this happen and when did it happen?

I think you may have me confused for this user: 172.165.235.249. This is NOT my IP address, as my IP address starts with a 71.--IAMTHEPEOPLESCHAMP 14:20, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good looking out

Thank you for helping me keep the O&A page accurate. If you are on wackbag please try to get me unbanned. Someone claimed I was a troll and now I can't post on the site. (Count Zero 04:54, 13 February 2006 (UTC))[reply]

p.s. Please post your vote here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_celebrity_guests_on_the_Howard_Stern_show

(Count Zero 04:57, 13 February 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Wackbagmain.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Wackbagmain.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BRossow 19:39, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I feel the need to explain something

i just needed to let off some steam, so i pickied wikipedia as a target. and now here i am with this one day IP ban. well, i guess i deserve it.--XMBRIAN 05:44, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

O&A

The Lobster Girl controversy is getting heated again. Please drop by the discussion page and add your opinion? Thanks. Attention whore 17:55, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Special X

OK -- I'm still leery of listing defunct channels, but I'll go with this one for now -- I even put in a category tag. NawlinWiki 01:55, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Ch hits special x lg.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Ch hits special x lg.gif. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:05, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Eric logan lg.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Eric logan lg.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:05, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Ward_cleaver_lg.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ward_cleaver_lg.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:38, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Arnie Spanier

I tagged the article for deletion because:

I did not think it was notable enough for Wikipedia - just being a person as you put it isn't enough to get included. I've run a quick google scan and I concede that he is probably notable enough to be included

The article has no content - one sentance is hardly even a stub. If you are planning to expand the entry into a better stub and include a bit more information then I would be happy for it to stay.

On a separate point you shouldn't really delete tags from articles without first trying to address what has been raised, either by improving the entry or talking about it - its against wikipedia policy and just creates friction where it needn't

If you have any other questions, please feel free. have fun editing! take care Mammal4 16:39, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:90slogocc.JPG)

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:90slogocc.JPG. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 01:29, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

O&A Army

I understand that you want it delted so either prod it or take it to Afd. But please do not be disruptive by putting a speedy tag back on it. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 03:56, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Go to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion#How to list pages for deletion. Use {{subst:afd1}} on the O&A Army. THen follow the red link and put {{subst:afd2 | pg=PageName | cat=Category | text=Reason the page should be deleted}} ~~~~ on that page. And you did the third part. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 04:04, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Or for a prod just use {{subst:prod|reason}}. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 04:05, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed the "subst". You need to watch because anybody, but not me, can remove that without a reason. In that case the only thing is an AfD. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 04:11, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problems. Some of the rules can be very confusing. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 04:17, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately for your misinformed self, I did not ask Dugout Doug to come until AFTER he himself had already become involved. Look at the times of each edit and you will see what I say is true. If you have a problem with this, deal. Payneos 03:15, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just because you linked that, NOW I am aware of Dugout Doug's posts, and as such, I NOW have asked for help in a responsible way. The Wiki needs editors, and this encyclopedia needs information to give to the masses. THis is important information, and you will come to realize that one way or another. Payneos 03:22, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rather than try to fix the articles, you just whined and asked for help from others in deleting them (By following the deletion procedures). There was no effort on your part to make it better, just destroy it. Payneos 03:26, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have yet to prove it's not wiki-able in a total fashion which warrants a total deletion. Payneos 03:29, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have, and so far, I'm not impressed. It seems less of an effort to read and make the article better and more an article simply to delete because they think it's fancruft, which it is not. If it had no verifiable sources, I would agree. However... it does. Payneos 03:33, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong. WP:CRUFT is not policy, but something that some wikipedians feel should be enforced. However, it is not offical, nor does everyone agree with it. Payneos 03:36, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

O&A Linkspam?

Not sure why you felt wowfans was linkspam? I think it's a valid fan site? Just as much as the others. --Bill.matthews 18:31, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

MineField Browser

On this forum topic about Mozilla FireFox 3, they told me that my article is good! Please read there comments! http://forums.windowsvistageeks.org/index.php?showtopic=487

Also, can you please tell me what I can do to keep an article under Mozilla Minefield or something like that! So that you wont delete it.

Please reply!

Panarchy 09:13, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WDAE

Sorry about that; I was (obviously) copying and pasting, and should have been paying more attention. —tregoweth (talk) 01:11, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Xmlogo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Xmlogo.gif. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:09, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:SNR_logo.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:SNR_logo.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 00:55, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Re [2]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. -- Infrogmation (talk) 19:24, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Ch world audio visions lg.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ch world audio visions lg.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:47, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Ch rock bigtracks lg.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ch rock bigtracks lg.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:00, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Ch hits mix xm lg.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ch hits mix xm lg.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:33, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Color has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 06:13, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Fuck constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 06:14, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked
You have been blocked for vandalism for 6 months. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page, replacing your reason here with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia after the block has expired, you will be blocked for longer and longer periods of time. Infrogmation (talk) 13:05, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite block

I've blocked you indefinitely for this and your other recent edit, following on a long history of vandalism, disruption, and wasting the time of the volunteers here. If you think this is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page, replacing your reason here with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email. Antandrus (talk) 03:44, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello IAMTHEPEOPLESCHAMP! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 3 of the articles that you created are Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current 723 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Chris Russell - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Bob Berger - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Bob Stelton - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 17:51, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bob Stelton for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Bob Stelton, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bob Stelton until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. The Wordsmith^Communicate 06:57, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Big Tracks

The article Big Tracks has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Wikipedical (talk) 02:58, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Grant Random for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Grant Random is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grant Random until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Whpq (talk) 23:14, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Doug Russell (radio personality)

The article Doug Russell (radio personality) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I'm unable to find sufficient secondary sources to support this BLP or claims in it.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Innisfree987 (talk) 22:23, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Arnie Spanier

The article Arnie Spanier has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I'm unable to find sufficient secondary sources to sustain this BLP.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Innisfree987 (talk) 06:21, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bill Lekas

The article Bill Lekas has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I'm unable to find sufficient independent secondary sources to sustain this BLP.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Innisfree987 (talk) 06:23, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of XM Deportivo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article XM Deportivo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XM Deportivo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Let'srun (talk) 12:44, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Special X for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Special X is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Special X until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Let'srun (talk) 11:36, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Audio Visions for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Audio Visions is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Audio Visions until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Let'srun (talk) 03:44, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]