User talk:I.Elgamal

Your submission at Articles for creation: Five-bar linkage has been accepted

Five-bar linkage, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 09:01, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Method of moving asymptotes moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Method of moving asymptotes. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources, it needs more sources to establish notability, it has too many problems of language or grammar and it is promotional and reads like an advertisement. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 00:45, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Method of moving asymptotes has been accepted

Method of moving asymptotes, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ca ^{talk to me!} 14:35, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

Halloumi

That "Taste - power - tradition" collection you found is quite interesting. Thanks! --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 20:22, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

@Jpgordon Glad you found it useful! Cheers :D I.Elgamal (talk) 23:53, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Doug Weller talk 13:18, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

You don't seem very interested in the topic so this shouldn't be a problem. Just to clarify, there are some pages you literally can't edit because of their protection settings. But there are more that are covered by the topic area that you can but must not edit. Doug Weller talk 13:20, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

Mashriq and Libya

Historically, Cyrenaica was occasionally considered part of the Mashriq (if Egypt was), but not Tripolitania. AnonMoos (talk) 06:56, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

@AnonMoos Perhaps then a specification of only Cyrenaica and Tripolitania is needed then? Having Libya be both in Mashriq and Maghreb doesn't make much sense. I.Elgamal (talk) 10:24, 24 July 2024 (UTC)