Jump to content

User talk:HyacinthBucket55

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wikipedia editor specialising in editing ITV Daytime and it's presenters' articles.

December 2020

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Ranvir Singh has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:10, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Ranvir Singh. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Materialscientist (talk) 18:18, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have not been able to find a 'reliable' source, what about The Sun, Hello!, or The Daily Mail? HyacinthBucket55 (talk) 20:50, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you cannot find a reliable source, then don't make the alteration. Some sources from periodicals and newspapers may be reliable, but others not so - from your list of suggestions the Daily Mail (for example) is not a reliable source, as per WP:RSPSRC. Timothy Titus Talk To TT 02:55, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the clarification HyacinthBucket55 (talk) 09:41, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Userboxes

[edit]

Hello, I would like to find out how to add a userbox. Can somebody help me please? HyacinthBucket55 (talk) 09:51, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Have you read the guide to this topic? It is here: Wikipedia:Userboxes. Timothy Titus Talk To TT 18:24, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you HyacinthBucket55 (talk) 20:11, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not censored

[edit]

Please note that this edit has been reverted as Wikipedia is Wp:NOTCENSORED. Canterbury Tail talk 20:46, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

[edit]

Hi HyacinthBucket55! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing!

Your submission at Articles for creation: Winning Combination (December 16)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 14:34, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, HyacinthBucket55! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 14:34, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

National Rheumatoid Arthritis Society moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, National Rheumatoid Arthritis Society, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster talk 17:51, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ria Hebden moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Ria Hebden, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Troutfarm27 (Talk) 22:29, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Winning Combination (January 26)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kieran207 was:
Although the topic is notable, this article has some issues. Such as large amounts of trivia (Catchphrases). And some general issues (Such as no bolding in lede). It also needs more sourcing.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Kieran207 talk 15:02, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your consideration. Only 20 episodes have been made so there are not many sources. Can I convert to a stub then convert to a normal article when more info has been added? Thanks HyacinthBucket55 (talk) 15:21, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

[edit]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Sally Hawkins, you may be blocked from editing. Sundayclose (talk) 01:58, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: National Rheumatoid Arthritis Society (February 12)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 16:51, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Undone edit

[edit]

Hi,

I've undone your most recent edit at Oprah with Meghan and Harry. In-article disclaimers are rare on Wikipedia, although not unheard of (e.g. List of genocides by death toll), however, in this instance consensus should be established first, especially given that we already have a site-wide disclaimer.

Thanks,

SITH (talk) 21:32, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for informing me

-HyacinthBucket55 (talk) 21:39, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Darragh Ennis (March 15)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at The Chase (British game show). Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
When this draft was last submitted, the reviewer said to discuss at Talk:The Chase (British game show). There has been very little such discussion. Please make another effort at discussion.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 06:38, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Darragh Ennis has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Darragh Ennis. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 06:39, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

University of Bristol alumi

[edit]

Thanks for updating List of University of Bristol people. However, I'm wondering, didn't you notice it's all ordered alphabetically? Rodericksilly (talk) 01:23, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh sorry- I was tired at that point. I will change it immediately. HyacinthBucket55 (talk) 08:08, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Matthew Wright (presenter), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. SK2242 (talk) 16:50, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mrs Hinch moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Mrs Hinch, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE🌈 19:52, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mrs Hinch

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mrs Hinch, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PRAXIDICAE🌈 12:43, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mrs Hinch for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mrs Hinch is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mrs Hinch until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

doktorb wordsdeeds 07:49, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Darragh Ennis has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Darragh Ennis. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 04:29, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Darragh Ennis has been accepted

[edit]
Darragh Ennis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 17:38, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Winning Combination has been accepted

[edit]
Winning Combination, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:04, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:National Rheumatoid Arthritis Society

[edit]

Information icon Hello, HyacinthBucket55. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:National Rheumatoid Arthritis Society, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:04, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Show Me Show Me, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Jarvis. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Steph's Packed Lunch has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Steph's Packed Lunch. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 03:10, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Characters in The Thursday Murder Club

[edit]

Information icon Hello, HyacinthBucket55. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Characters in The Thursday Murder Club, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Characters in The Thursday Murder Club

[edit]

Hello, HyacinthBucket55. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Characters in The Thursday Murder Club".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:20, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Bob (cat)

[edit]

Information icon Hello, HyacinthBucket55. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bob (cat), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Bob (cat)

[edit]

Hello, HyacinthBucket55. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bob".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:54, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Characters in The Thursday Murder Club

[edit]

Hello, HyacinthBucket55. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Characters in The Thursday Murder Club".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:22, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:HyacinthBucket55&oldid=1158215750"