User talk:Hut 8.5/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Note that if you want to retrospectively alter your signature, retarget a redirect or other really trivial change I don't really care. Hut 8.5 19:16, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Changes Reverted

I appreciate your efforts on the EC site, but because of the increased vandalism we can't continue to monitor the site all of the time - we do appreciate the efforts of the Wikipedia editors, like yourself, that have helped us out. We looked at what other schools are doing -for example, providing an interesting overview or history with a link to their website. I believe all of the content on the site was contributed by us. I would appreciate it if you would revert the content back to my last edits. Thank you, Jcommett

The Endicott page was tagged and we are in the process of trying to update it as requested. Can you let me know how we can go about making changes that are not reverted each time. Thanks—Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.248.117.2 (talk • contribs)

vandalism on necromunda

I do not edit wikipedia posts and I did i would not vandalise them. could you tell me what i supposedly 'vandalised' on the necromunda page??

You've got a dynamic IP address which changes periodically. Someone who had that IP address did vandalise a page here and here, but you got the warning message because your IP address changed. Sorry about this - we can't avoid it. Hut 8.5 19:47, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Sloppy Revert

Hi there, I see from your user page that you're a serious vandalism fighter. (Thumbs up to that!) Unfortunately, this recent edit did not help things -- it only served to prolong the mess, especially when a subsequent editor carelessly assumed that you had made a clean revert. Whew! Btw, you weren't the first -- a previous editor made the same mistake! (and I just left a note for him/her, too) Anyway, please try to be just a bit more careful, so this sort of thing doesn't happen again in the future. Regards, Cgingold 14:32, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Sorry

Sorry, its just that he vandalized the Trick Daddy page.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.2.205.128 (talk • contribs)

Vandalism to Betaeleven

thanks for your message, this computer is on a multi-user network, so not sure who is doing it, we'll be keeping an eye out. thanks. Jeff

Thank you

Thank you for your welcome message, I've created a few articles (and expanded a couple of others), all related to Captains class frigate - there is a list of articles I have created on my user page. Before I go any further with my little project can you tell me if there is anywhere I can go to get an experienced Wikipedian to look at what I have done and correct any errors I have made in terms of style and stuff?
Thefrood 15:49, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the offer "go though them if you get the time" - if time allows just pick one and let me know what you have done - I should be able to transpose the fixes to the rest of the articles - HMS Affleck (K462) might be the one to go for.
Thefrood 19:47, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Once again thank you - I can see what you have done, I'll update the rest accordingly.
Thefrood 20:18, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Evil

mind your own buisness with my nice pages—Preceding unsigned comment added by Shadowv70 (talk • contribs)

I do not want my page deleted speedily or in any other manor

This web page about David swofford is more accurate than you could ever know. It is not making fun of him or her in any way. Please leave it up. Thank you Hut 8.5. Respectfully your acquaintance - Gemsbok9000

If you delete my page about David swofford i'm just gonna repost it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Gemsbok9000 (talk • contribs) 20:08, 6 April 2007 (UTC).

Tom Delay Changes

Vandalism or disclaimer? I appreciate your concern, but I wish to notify the users/visitors of Mr. Delay's page that the page has in fact been edited by Rosie O'Donnell, in personal attacks on him. I am neither a fan or foe of either of those individuals, but I am against misinformation. This story was covered on the well-known Drudge Report. Is it vandalism to warn readers that the content has been written/altered by a critic? That the subject matter's bias is in dispute? Please instruct me how to put a 'this article's fairness is in dispute' warning/disclaimer at the top. If you wish to revert the article, then please revert it back past Ms. O'Donnell's changes as well. I did not alter, remove, or vandalize any of the page. I removed nothing. I inserted a warning, nothing else. Inserting a warning is not unconstructive. Removing it is. Thank you. By the way, I'm a little confused as to how you became the arbiter of fairness on Wikipedia? Just curious.Humbleradio 02:41, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Riana

Thanks for reverting the article. Would you mind reverting the current version also? It's still vandalised; for some reason I feel a little awkward reverting it myself... – Riana ^ऋ 16:09, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks! :) – Riana ^ऋ 16:10, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

And thanks for reverting my talk page. Good work. :) Bubba hotep 16:12, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Highwayman

Dude i thought you had an entry for spanish Highwaymen: es:Bandolero, but you dont.

Cheers from the Spanish Wikiepdia. Afrox

thanks

Thanks for reverted my userpage... I didn't see it before. HoneyBee 23:29, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Hahaha...

Looks like you've been doing this (or is it this? whatever....) for a while. I saw it and was like "wait... where the hell did that come from???" - Bagel7^{T's,C's,Dub's} 11:13, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Ok.... I'm confused. What's wrong with the history on that page? - Bagel7^{T's,C's,Dub's} 11:18, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

The revert.

Thanks for the revert to my user page. That was quite a nasty vandal that one. Acalamari 16:20, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

ditto. :) Rosa 20:23, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

marc testrart

In relation to me wiping that article. it is in fact my article and i want them taken off. It turns out the information is not correct, and they must be taken down asap. If you could please do this for me. Thankyou dem

Basell Polyolefins

Hi Hut 8.5

Personally, I believe, that any commercial entry on Wikipedia is advertising. My company (and its predecessor companies) have pioneered the development of polypropylene (polyolefin) from their discovery in the 1950s to the present day - we only seek a presence on Wikipedia similar to BASF or ExxonMobile to discuss our history (and future).

Looking forward to hearing from you - thanks.

Kind regards

Mark talley 17:04, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

woooooooops

Thanks for spotting Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:Portuguese District Football Associations. I'm moving to the proper forum. I was wondering why the archive templates were purple and not green, as I remembered... I shouldn't do that kind of stuff when I'm tired :) -- lucasbfr ^talk 12:37, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Leave off my user page

Whats your obsession with getting it deleted, stop wiki-stalking me. --Boris 1991 09:08, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for leaving a post on the user who vandalized my home page. Much appreciated. Organ123 19:04, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Please help in my article about Petitions.

I have tried and tried to write an acceptable article in wikipedia. I am very frustrated.

Others can make links to their web sites. Why is it mine are considered spam?

Would you look at the article about Direct Democracy in Wiki, where you will see many notations to Sen. Gravel's web site.

How is it he can do this and I cannot, even though I am in support of this man's ideas?

All I want to do here is be able to direct anyone who might be interested to find the Peitition. What is wrong with that? This is NOT a commercial venture for me, but a patriotic voluntary effort to help get the troops home before another 3,000 die senseless deaths.

Please help us.

Mike Mathiesen

newhall

nice to see a proper ref... Victuallers 17:05, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

EndUN Userbox

Hi, you recently participated in the Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:DieWeisseRose/Userboxes/EndUN discussion. I have reluctantly submitted the closing statement by User:Tony Sidaway for deletion review. Please consider taking a look at Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2007_July_1#User:DieWeisseRose.2FUserboxes.2FEndUN. Thanks. --DieWeisseRose 02:58, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Jaton

Thanks for the speedy response in relation to the Jaton Corporate attack article. Just testing wikipedia's ability to maintain integrity. It only took a few seconds for the offending article to be identified and deleted. I am not sure whether this was an automated procedure or if it was done manually. So I'm asking. :) Is this the fine work of your automated 'sock puppet', or you?

And by the way, everything I wrote is true... :) I have solid evidence, sadly I will have to find a new way to shut down these guys. Cheers!

Thanks for the warm welcome and links

Thanks Hut. I've already worked on a few articles and it's rewarding work let me tell you, especially when you come back and find that somebody has improved what you started.

Cheers. Vlad Dracula 01:31, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Parcopresis

You tagged an article for deletion for copyright infringement and it has been deleted. In fact, the article had the "permission" of the website that the material had appeared on, but in any event the content was supplied for inclusion in Wikipedia by the original author (who had also supplied it for that site), and so the permission of that site was not even needed.Minician 22:42, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting my talk page. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 18:18, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

No problem. Hut 8.5 18:19, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

WP:PS again

Please check out this MFD. Your opinion is welcome and requested since you particiated in the original MFD. /Blaxthos 22:11, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Gears of War

Sorry, tried to undo vandalism but apparently I didn't know what I was doing and I undid what you tried to fix... haha, it all looks good now though, thanks.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.109.187.2 (talk • contribs)

Userbox

I didn't know that, thanks for the heads up. I actually forgot about that user box, lol.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Michfan2123 (talk • contribs)

Oi

My comment was hidden. What's the problem? - ZEROpumpkins 11:13, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Elisha Cuthbert

Heh. Seems you reverted moments before I did. Thanks.— Timotab ^{Timothy (not Tim dagnabbit!)} 18:11, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Alleged vandalism

Did you go to Provo High School? I see by your profile that you quite obviously did not. Please don't edit my changes unless you did and you actually know what you are talking about.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Payneholmes (talk • contribs)

User InfoCheck violated 3 revert rule on Gothic Chess page

Hello,

The user InfoCheck keeps inserting a link that does not belong on the Gothic Chess page. I have asked him to stop doing this. Can you intervene? He keeps inserting posts to his own meaningless game, which he claims is very much like Gothic Chess, when this is not the case. Examine the two yourself:

	a	b	c	d	e	f	g	h	i	j
8											8
7											7
6											6
5											5
4											4
3											3
2											2
1											1
	a	b	c	d	e	f	g	h	i	j

The game of Gothic Chess of which a great deal of material has been published.

	a	b	c	d	e	f	g	h	i	j
8											8
7											7
6											6
5											5
4											4
3											3
2											2
1											1
	a	b	c	d	e	f	g	h	i	j

The game of Optimized Chess which has no followers aside from its creator.

Thanks for your help.

ChessHistorian 05:19, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

Excuse me

I read about that discussion you had on my user page. Thanks for being the only one to vote yes... i am new... and it did upset me. You guys should be a little nicer cuz that should be put under bullying in the encyclopidia. And now you are planning to rip apart my user page? Geez! I'm telling all my friends and teachers and school not to use wikipedia because it is harsh, cruel, crude, and overall not understanding. They will all listen! But thank you for listening to me. I am still very upset though. I don't even have a myspace. Those were all STORIES! I like to write STORIES! I had them there so all my friends in school could read my STORIES! Thank you.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/Subpages_of_FonzieBaby

Excuse me please

BEATLES RULE!!! go fonz! 20:33, 17 August 2007 (UTC)I read about that discussion you had on my user page. Thanks for being the only one to vote yes... i am new... and it did upset me. You guys should be a little nicer cuz that should be put under bullying in the encyclopidia. And now you are planning to rip apart my user page? Geez! I'm telling all my friends and teachers and school not to use wikipedia because it is harsh, cruel, crude, and overall not understanding. They will all listen! But thank you for listening to me. I am still very upset though. I don't even have a myspace. Those were all STORIES! I like to write STORIES! I had them there so all my friends in school could read my STORIES! Thank you. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/Subpages_of_FonzieBaby

The long standing problems with the user named InfoCheck

Some information of which you might not be aware.

http://www.gothicchess.com/nalls.html

That person has long since engaged in repeated attacks against me, the game of Gothic Chess, and my patent. This is the reason I consider him an adverse candidate and a person that should be prohibitted from posting material to the Gothic Chess article.

GothicChessInventor 20:42, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

The Community

Judging by you comments on MFD you might be interested in this --Pheonix15 16:12, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

About "infinity the game"

Hi. I'm sorry about the spanish infinity page, it was an accident. I though i was creating it in the es. page... sorry and thanks :)--El Moucho Loco 01:09, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Content deletion

Hey, when you reverted some vandalism on the U.S. Navy Slang page, you also removed everything from the letter V on. Was this intentional? If so, why? --ScreaminEagle 21:07, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Nevermind. Fixed. --ScreaminEagle 21:26, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Kamala Devi

Hi, I have used simple copy and paste to transfer content instead of "move" for moving content from "Kamala devi" to "Kamala Devi". Please sort it out. I request you not to delete "Kamala Devi" but instead sort out my mistake. Thanks.

Townblight 18:35, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

I am spanish history historian

I am Spanish history historian- I don't speak or write English very well-- I am trying to make the article possible--regarding ""Rodolfo Arismendy Parra de Urzaiz y Azlor de Aragon Y Rodolfo Alfonso Marco de Borbon Y Martnez-Bordi De lcantara Tellez-Girnon I do know my history, I made some mistake with Jaime which is the duke of segovia and Jaime the duke of de Mandas y Villanueva. Interesting to see a dynasty disappear like the Aragon Dysnasty or the House of House of Trastámara. I have not finish this article with accurate information from historical novel that prove this is an important person, whom had made many contribution to the world and has been nominated. In addition, he is the only beside the Villahermosa dukedom to be consider a direct decedant of Aragon. Making him the crown prince of the defunct throne of Aragon. I have date and fact, books about the Aragon dynasty and it role. Please help me make this article possible, I need advise and guide to make this article important to me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fernandoz123 (talk • contribs) 20:55, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Stop Editing My Comments

This is now the second time you have edited my comments on the Discussion Page at Gothic Chess. Do it again, and I will file a complaint against you.

GothicChessInventor 20:14, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

I see you returned to the Gothic Chess discsussion are removed my delimiters that I need to find my comments in the long list of discussion.

GothicChessInventor 20:14, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Was user talk:Majorclanger a hoax blocking?

The Majorclanger Talk page had a blocking applied by a non admin. It was only for 48 hours. Well Majorclanger Lost the edit war. I had an idea! Why don't you really block Majorclanger for the last 24 hours of the block.81.151.75.120 17:09, 20 September 2007 (UTC) Sorry talk to an admin so he can block Majorclanger! Sorry to disturb you! 81.151.75.120 17:39, 20 September 2007 (UTc) But I've contacted an admin and the blocking was for vandalism. Lets forget about it now. Im sorry to disturb you. Cheers!81.151.75.120 19:31, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Deletion gestapo

Yes, my error. Please see Talk:Deletion gestapo page for my explanation, if you so desire. --GeĸrίtzĿ._..•˚^˚ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gekritzl (talk • contribs) 12:01, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

Sloppy Reverter

Fair enough for reverting the page. But you reverted it and didn't take any notice at all as to how the sentence read. Therefore it was unable to be understood. Dont worry though I have filled in the relevent missing words which you very badly missed out. Check them if you wish, it is not vandalism.

Take more care in future?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.33.121.112 (talk • contribs)

Try paying attention.

Yes, 'that' edit was entirley 'unacceptable' - however this was not me. This is a shared computer. YOU changed the vandalism - by knocking out the rude words. IF YOU HAD READ the revert you made, you would knotice that it was complete nonsense! The sentence mae no sense! You should have reverted it back to a readable form. I have changed it back to normal myself. Check if you wish.

I understand this 'job' of yours may be demanding, but in future PAY ATTENTION. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.33.121.112 (talk) 20:13, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

Not complaining as if you had, and I know it was directed at the person who did it - Thanks for keeping my correction in - I was just notifying you that a bad revert was made. You should have reverted it back twice. That unacceptable one and also once before where someone removed words. But I have fixed it now.

end of. friends? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.33.121.112 (talk) 20:26, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

82.33.121.112 20:38, 28 September 2007 (UTC) When I look back I see that it used to read If pupils in KS3 do good work or make a good point they may gain a merit.

Then someone must have deleted the 'good point' section then next added the rude comment. That was then reverted and it was all a bit messy as it read do 'good work or make a merit'.

Dont worry though It's all fine now. I think I have improved the wording compared to that orginal version anyhow.