User talk:Hunnic Enjoyer

Welcome!

Hi Hunnic Enjoyer! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! I dream of horses ^{(Contribs) (Talk)} 16:07, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Hello, I'm Kansas Bear. I noticed that you recently removed content from Battle of Manzikert without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. --Kansas Bear (talk) 21:41, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

Hi Hunnic Enjoyer! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of First Perso-Turkic War several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:First Perso-Turkic War, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 22:26, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on First Perso-Turkic War. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. HistoryofIran (talk) 11:31, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't exactly know the rules of Wikipedia, i am new here as you can see so i think this is normal for a beginner with history knowledge i guess Hunnic Enjoyer (talk) 22:34, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Right, please reply to me at [1] when you have time. HistoryofIran (talk) 22:37, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia. HistoryofIran (talk) 13:32, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Like the Second Perso-Turkic War article has too many sources to prove that the War was Sasanian Victory. You call UNESCO, Cambridge, Oxford etc. poorly sourced material while you put literally no sources in your articles? Okay, understandable. Hunnic Enjoyer (talk) 14:16, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you still can't tell what I am referring to here, then that's heavily concerning. See WP:CIR. --HistoryofIran (talk) 14:18, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tong Yabghu Khagan's Expedition to East Iran for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tong Yabghu Khagan's Expedition to East Iran is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tong Yabghu Khagan's Expedition to East Iran until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

HistoryofIran (talk) 23:25, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Armenia Expedition (630) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Armenia Expedition (630) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Armenia Expedition (630) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

HistoryofIran (talk) 23:35, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Kansas Bear (talk) 21:18, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Armenia Expedition (630)

Can you please explain why you keep restoring those primary sources? [2]. Did you read WP:PST? If so, why do you still think it should be there? HistoryofIran (talk) 19:19, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history

Hunnic Enjoyer, you seem to have run into backlash from the get-go. In addition to the Teahouse and Task Center listed above, given your areas of interest, I suggest you might also find some answers at WT:MILHIST. Don't give up. My first few edits and articles, I got a lot of backlash from all around. I never gave up. Don't you give up, either. — Maile (talk) 01:22, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your suggestion and support :) Hunnic Enjoyer (talk) 21:07, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of the Utus, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Vid, Areobindus and Vit. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Battle of Baideng. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. HistoryofIran (talk) 15:06, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 17:38, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well i am explaining and using the sources to explain while you are refuting with no accurate knowledge about this topic, I explained it in the Talk Page, it was 20.000-40.000 before and it should stay like that while the exaggerated info is debunked. Hunnic Enjoyer (talk) 17:41, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You constantly edit war (often with no explanation), use WP:VER sources which are often misrepresented. I think it's about high time you got reported. HistoryofIran (talk) 17:44, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well and you are just refuting and rejecting without even considering to check the sources. You are just keep focusing on Lev Gumilev, but there is also a source published by Cambridge University Press and written by Nicola Di Cosmo. They are not misrepresented, i even put their Pdf's you can check. Hunnic Enjoyer (talk) 17:47, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I always explain why am i tryin to change but you guys don't even consider to understand and check the sources if they are correct or else. Hunnic Enjoyer (talk) 17:49, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

When my 48 hour block is over, let's debate about the strength in talk page of Battle of Baideng Hunnic Enjoyer (talk) 20:12, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Case (talk) 19:19, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Armenia Expedition (630)

Hello, Hunnic Enjoyer. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Armenia Expedition (630), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:06, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Alibutbased. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Vanamonde93 (talk) 01:36, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Armenia Expedition (630)

Hello, Hunnic Enjoyer. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Armenia Expedition".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:02, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Hunnic Enjoyer. Thank you for your work on Xiongnu invasion of Donghu. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 12:55, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]