User talk:Hunkybuck

Welcome!

Hello, Hunkybuck, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Pig vomit, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Dspradau → talk 14:41, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "Pig vomit"

A page you created, Pig vomit, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is vandalism.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Dspradau → talk 14:41, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

June 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but in this recent edit you removed a speedy deletion tag from Pig vomit, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pig_vomit?diff=499145038 Dspradau → talk 15:12, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pig vomit listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Pig vomit. Since you had some involvement with the Pig vomit redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). SmartSE (talk) 17:09, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

Hello, I'm ToBeFree. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Steven Crowder, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 06:04, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Citing YouTube

Hi, regarding your question, care must be taken, especially when writing about living people, not to misuse primary sources. (WP:BLP, WP:PRIMARY)

"frequently" is your personal interpretation (WP:OR)
YouTube is generally not a reliable source (WP:SPS).

If there is absolutely no doubt about the identity of a YouTube account, it may within very careful reason be used as a low-quality source. Details can be found at WP:ABOUTSELF. Best regards ~ ToBeFree (talk) 07:32, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

Your recent editing history at Steven Crowder shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — Bilorv (talk) 09:05, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't send the above message as an intimidation, but because I would like for you to participate in the talk page discussion I started around this content. Talk page discussions are the proper way to introduce contentious changes. Five reverts is not acceptable—even if the quality of the content being introduced is gradually improving—and if the number rises any higher now that you understand this, I'm afraid you may indeed be blocked to prevent disruption. In general, it's a good rule on Wikipedia that the more you discuss and less you revert, the more seriously you will be taken, and the more likely your changes are to be accepted. — Bilorv (talk) 09:09, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]