User talk:Hundredalexander

Fair use rationale for Image:No Love Without Pain.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:No Love Without Pain.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 00:09, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Goodies

It's not necessary. Charmed36 (talk) 18:28, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's on the title track page because an IP user came changing pop to hip hop and I decided to keep both to make the user happy. Charmed36 (talk) 18:31, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is but just Pablo's verses. Charmed36 (talk) 18:34, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you. I started these articles. I protect them. Charmed36 (talk) 18:39, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello, Hundredalexander, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!

By the way, I have removed information about your age from your user page. For your own protection, you should not volunteer such information on the public internet. Best, Sandstein (talk) 23:34, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hundredalexander (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why have I been blocked? And what is a sock here on Wikipedia? Lastly, who the HELL is this 98E guy you say of? He sounds like a very dispruptive guy to me, but I have NOTHING to do with him. Have you even SEEN my YouTube page? I am CLEARLY a kid, not this 98E guy. I can e-mail you about this if you want. Please unblock as soon as possible. I have made a YouTube videeo about it, see it here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZZ7YOXTfE8Y. Hundredalexander (talk) 00:45, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Decline reason:

The evidence provided within the sock report overwhelming confirms that you are in fact yet another sockpuppet of 98E. The youtube video even ties you to 98E, as he claimed to broadcast himself on YouTube. Declined - auburnpilot talk 02:34, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I've reviewed the evidence, and it's nothing less than damning. And a video on Youtube proves nothing; even if this person is you, then it was you all along. The Evil Spartan (talk) 02:18, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead and asked Spellcast (talk · contribs) to comment. - auburnpilot talk 02:20, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Evil Spartan: So my I wasted my time making my video?
AuburnPilot: Thanks, I hope he unblocks. Hundredalexander (talk) 02:22, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, actually my thinking was "he wasted his time in creating 100's of other accounts", to which you bare an uncanny similarity. My thinking was "the fact that he has finally gone ahead and shown us his face does not mean it's not him anymore". My thinking was "98E has finally thought out that if he posts a video after he's next blocked for the umpteenth time, maybe he'll get unblocked." The Evil Spartan (talk) 02:28, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Except I have no clue what 98E even looks like and what kind of edits he's made. Hundredalexander (talk) 02:32, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The YouTube post is more proof of this account being User:98E. See the new evidence about that at Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/98E (2nd). Spellcast (talk) 02:37, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hundredalexander (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Maybe that Replay guy is 98E and was just playing around by saying he was a kid, but I very well am NOT that user or any of 98E's other socks. I wanna help Wikipedia and already have some edits planned out. You'll be doing a very good thing by unblocking and whoever does unblock me will get a barnstar. Hundredalexander (talk) 02:45, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Decline reason:

reason —declined SSP case very convincing — Rlevse • Talk • 03:40, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hundredalexander (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is the last request I'm gonna make here. It's so obvious that I'm not 98E, and if you're not gonna accept this request, then you hate me. And if you don't accept it, fine, I don't your asses, I'll be sure to mention Wikipedia as my least favourite website when I'm famous, and I'll be sure to sue Wikipedia for fraud. But none of the bad things will happen if you unblock. If you decline this, I'll make another video on YouTube about how stupid this place is. And if you don't believe me, you NEED SERIOUS mental help. Seriously. Is unblocking me gonna kill you? No. And might I ask something else: Why has e-mailing other users been blocked for me? Answer that. And restore my user page please, Spellcast vandalized it. And lastly: Remember about what I said. I'll sue Wikipedia for fraudelent blocking. You don't want that to happen, right? So, answer ALL my questions and unblock me. Hundredalexander (talk) 15:06, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Making legal threats is a reason to impose an indefinite block, so even if all o your other argument were valid, the fact that you have just made such a legal threat would result in an indefinite block. Gwernol 15:38, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Then prepare to be sued in a few months for fraud. Hundredalexander (talk) 15:46, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

helpme|I just wanna know: Why the HELL has e-mail been blocked for me? Hundredalexander (talk) 16:08, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

To prevent you making further legal threats. If you continue to make legal threats here this page will be blocked to prevent you continuing. You are not permitted to edit Wikipedia until all legal threats are resolved. Please read WP:NLT. Thanks, Gwernol 16:31, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How do I resolve them? Hundredalexander (talk) 16:33, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the email was blocked based on the sockpuppetry report. Please read WP:NLT about the legal threats which came later. - Rjd0060 (talk) 16:34, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So I can't e-mail anyone here because I'm accused of being a sockpuppet? I see other people who really ARE sockpuppets and e-mail isn't disabled for them. Hundredalexander (talk) 16:36, 17 February 2008 (UTC) {{helpme|Also, can someone tell me why Spellcast's vandalism on my user page hasn't been reverted yet? Hundredalexander (talk) 16:37, 17 February 2008 (UTC)}}[reply]

I'm not quite sure about that. I'll leave a note for the blocking administrator. Until then, read WP:NLT and do not use helpme templates. - Rjd0060 (talk) 16:38, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a note for the blocking admin. Rjd0060 (talk) 17:08, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't typically disable email, but when abuse and death threats are sent (block log), it seems appropriate. Spellcast (talk) 18:57, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Except I'm not a sockpuppet for the billionth time. Hundredalexander (talk) 19:04, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So I think you need a better reason becuase I have NEVER abuse the e-mail system. So gimmie a better reason. Hundredalexander (talk) 20:00, 17 February 2008 (UTC) {{editprotected}}[reply]

Please stop abusing templates like the help template, the editprotected template, and the unblock template, or this page will be protected from editing. - Rjd0060 (talk) 23:48, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

But I want my user page back so badly! I'll stop if you restore it! Hundredalexander (talk) 01:37, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why can't my page be restored? Gimmie a good reason why! Hundredalexander (talk) 02:05, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The user pages of indefinitely blocked users are always replaced with that notice. That is not vandalism, it is simply standard practice. Your page is available through the History tab if you either want to see it, or if you are unblock in which case it will be restored. In the meantime, please stop wasting everyone's time. Pursue your unblocking request via email and wait for that process to complete. Your requests to have your userpage restored will not be met until that is complete. Gwernol 02:48, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Except e-mail is blocked for me. So I guess I'm not getting unblocked until a few months when I'm famous. Since I'll be famous in a few months, I'll be allowed to have an account here once I am, right? Hundredalexander (talk) 02:50, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, people are not given accounts simply because they are "famous". Anyone can register, but if there is disruption, anyone can be blocked (regardless of their level of fame). - auburnpilot talk 19:08, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Then please re-enable my e-mail or I can't make any further requests. Hundredalexander (talk) 19:48, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See above.--Werdan7^{T @} 16:39, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

About the sending death threats that 98E did? That's not me. Please re-enable it. Hundredalexander (talk) 16:43, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Hundredalexander/Hundredalexander

User:Hundredalexander/Hundredalexander, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Hundredalexander/Hundredalexander and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Hundredalexander/Hundredalexander during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 04:37, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]