User talk:Humanbyrace

An Invite to join WikiProject Genetics

Hi, Humanbyrace. You are cordially invited to join the Genetics WikiProject! We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to genetics. We've noticed that you have an interest in the field, and may be interested in joining Wikipedia's dedicated collaborative effort.

We look forward to working with you in the project! – Liveste (talk • edits) 13:50, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are receiving this automated message because your userpage appears in Category:Wikipedians interested in genetics.

Problems with upload of File:Haplotype Tree map.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Haplotype Tree map.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:06, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Genetic Race by Haplotypes.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Genetic Race by Haplotypes.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:07, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Haplotype middle east.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Haplotype middle east.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:07, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Arab

Don't want to diminish your enthusiasm, but all the technical genetics stuff and "racial science" is most probably of little overall relevance to the Arab article, if it turns out to have little to do with how Arabs define themselves, or how they are defined by others (which seems to be the case). And "race science" in that form has obvious politically awkward aspects. If your first few excursions into this area have not started any meaningful discussion, then adding further long dissertations to page Talk:Arab is unlikely to change that. And if you have little personal knowledge of linguistics, it would be better to refrain from making broad sweeping categorical absolute assertions without any sources on this subject matter... AnonMoos (talk) 01:01, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Be carefull with other users' pages

Usually it is a very bad idea to add unwanted staff to user pages like you have done here. Please use talk pages for discussions, user pages are mostly for the user itself to express their wikiphilosophy, etc. Please read WP:USER if you are interested in more details about the user pages Alex Bakharev (talk) 22:24, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Please take some time to review basic policies. Wikipedia is not a blog, and all your contributions seem to be soapboxing on talkpages, pushing some kind of irrelevant nonsense or other (basque? Turkish? really?) and generally wasting everyone's time. Such conduct is not acceptable and is generally rewarded with bans. Thank you. Moreschi (talk) 13:23, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I see this behaviour has continued. You are blocked for 72 hours for consistent violations of WP:TALK and WP:NOTAFORUM. Moreschi (talk) 14:15, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Minaret controversy in Switzerland

I have reverted your edits[1][2]. Wikipedia talk pages are not political discussion forums and not soapboxes for advocating particular points of view on political issues, even if those views are correct. An article talk page is for discussing improvements to the article. E.g. it would be perfectly appropriate for you to suggest at that talk page inclusion of some specific information in the article (e.g. reflecting the points of view argued in your two posts mentioned above), if you find some newsarticles raising these points in relation to the Switzerland minaret controversy. Even then, however, the info in question would need to be presented in the article with attribution to specific sources rather than as an abstract point. But, arguing for or against particular political positions reflecting your own point of view (even if these positions are correct), is inappropriate. Nsk92 (talk) 14:06, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Indo-European languages

Please respect WP:TALK and avoid burdening talkpages with random thoughts that cross your mind. Wikipedia is not a discussion forum. --dab (𒁳) 15:42, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

= ]

I was going to write somehting but than i saw your talk page and laughed. Your racial science is a joke. And your denial that polymaths like Ibn Sina, Nasir Tusi, Biruni, etc are not Persian is very amusing to say the least. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ditc (talk • contribs) 10:33, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Haplotype middle east.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Haplotype middle east.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:57, 2 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:57, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Genetic Race by Haplotypes.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Genetic Race by Haplotypes.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:57, 2 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:57, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Haplotype Tree map.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Haplotype Tree map.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:58, 2 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:58, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

your behaviour

please

stop invoking fringe authors like Martin Bernal on articles about serious topics of mainstream scholarship
stop pasting huge amounts of copyrighted text to talkpages. It is disruptive and illegal
stop indulging in random comments based on nothing but your personal whim. We are not a chat forum, we are trying to write an encyclopedia.

--dab (𒁳) 19:52, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mainstream scholars of world first 2 universities such as Cambridge and Harvard (Colin Renfrew, Witzel...) and also Gimbutas state that Indo-Hittite urheimat is in Anatolia and as you know Europe was populated by middle easterners (Caucasoid phenotype appeared in middle east after discovery of agriculture)

It's well known that alphabet, culture, religions and language of Europe were born in Arabia and that modern human appaeared in Africa and only racists like some wikiusers and moderators dont want to write that!? why we have short lifes and did not choose our race, language or religion so why are you playin racism and fascism!?

Please be human, &objective

Humanbyrace (talk) 12:13, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I want to add that what I quotated is not of Bernal but of other archeologists, historians and linguists and he does only quoting please read the text again and reintegrate it to the article you should be neutral even if you are yourself an aryanist racist you did not choose your race language or religion so be objective and dont play racism this IS AN ECYCLOPAEDOA AND WE WANT TO KNOW WHAT REALLY HAPPENED SO DONT DIRT IT WITH FASLSIFICATION AND OTHER ABSURD BIAS DUE TO ABSURD INHERITED YOUR RACE LANGUAGE ETC...

Humanbyrace (talk) 12:19, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FYI - ANI

Hi, your editing has been mention in a thread at the Administrators Noticeboard here, thanks. Off2riorob (talk) 12:55, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for treating Wikipedia as a discussion forum and making personal attacks against other editors. You are not permitted to characterise other editors, or their arguments, as "racist" just because you happen to disagree with them, and neither is Wikipedia a venue for promoting your favourite anthropological theories. If you want that sort of discussion there are plenty of other websites that you will find more suited to your needs. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. EyeSerene^talk 13:16, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:SOAPBOX. Please respect the rules and stop posting personal rants on article talkpages. After your block expired you immediately recommenced the very behaviour for which you were blocked. Be aware that if you do not change your behaviour now, block lengths are going to increase. --dab (𒁳) 15:08, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am honest that's why "my behavior" could not please you, I live and die as a honest man better than living in a self denial and self deception! Humanbyrace (talk) 09:56, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Indo-european .png

Thank you for uploading File:Indo-european .png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:32, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mani Babylonian - Persian

I notice you posted on the Mani (prophet) page about Mani's origins. There is somewhat of an edit war going on now on the Manichaeism page, with some trying to maintain he was of solely Persian descent. Would you care to get involved?Jimhoward72 (talk) 01:15, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_J1_(Y-DNA)

Please review and comment:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_J1_(Y-DNA)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Haplogroup_J1_(Y-DNA)
JohnLloydScharf (talk) 23:44, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

re: your notions of the dates of the origin of languages ....

Well, I see you've been blocked more than once, and by your User Page you are pretty much all over the map philosophically and politically, so this is probably a pointless exercise, but here goes: Arabic did not come into being in 6000 B.C. It's origin is much later. We have no records of any language older than Sumerian in the 3rd century B.C. Persian is not a semitic language and is not related to Arabic - although due to interaction between Arabs and Iranians there are tons of loan-words in Persian from Arabic. You say you have an interest in linguistics - I suggest some basic university courses as a start, so that your vast misconceptions can be corrected.