User talk:Hugo Lumo

Welcome!

Hi Hugo Lumo! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! I dream of horses ^{(Contribs) (Talk)} 16:54, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@I dream of horses

Hello TL37863,

I like it here and wish to stay in Wikipedia Community. Thanks for the tutorials you introduced me to. I am also sorry for responding to this message late.

I will always contact the Teahouse any time I need help.

I appreciate this warm welcome.

Thanks. Hugo Lumo (talk) 12:00, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Hello, I'm TLJ7863. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Colorado River have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. TLJ7863 (talk) 22:32, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ok thanks. Hugo Lumo (talk) 22:40, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'll assume that it was human error, since the rest of your edits seem to be okay. TLJ7863 (talk) 23:53, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Family Ties, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Do not change the phrasing of quotes per MOS:SIC: "Quotations must be verifiably attributed, and the wording of the quoted text must be faithfully reproduced. This is referred to as the principle of minimal change." Echoedmyron (talk) 11:40, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Noted, thanks a lot. Hugo Lumo (talk) 12:44, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nexar

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nexar, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 15:05, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Drmies (talk) 17:27, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Drmies: You blocked the sock here, but not the master – was that intentional? – Joe (talk) 11:09, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Joe Roe, I can't remember. I did look, apparently, at the highly promotional Steve Bentley (and moved it to draft space), which is one of the factors that led me to run CU--yes, I may simply have forgotten to block User:Yu45Me. Drmies (talk) 13:47, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @Drmies and Joe Roe: could you check again? Smallbones_(smalltalk) 16:24, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  - Smallbones, check what? These accounts are stale. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 17:21, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Public transport software

Hello Hugo Lumo, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Public transport software, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Public transport software.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Dclemens1971}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dclemens1971 (talk) 13:58, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]