User talk:HuffTheWeevil
 | This user may have left Wikipedia. HuffTheWeevil has not edited Wikipedia since August 2022. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Brilliant Idea Barnstar |
| For your "announced" removal drive. Excellent stuff. oknazevad (talk) 14:33, 5 October 2014 (UTC) |
United Airlines
[edit]Many thanks for reverting my "edit". To be honest, I was not aware I'd made the alteration - the cursor must have been over the rollback feature and was pressed by accident. Thanks to you for the reversion. Regards, David, David J Johnson (talk) 09:33, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
Alaska Airlines
[edit]Have you fly that airline? Nikolas.Sudarpo (talk) 08:35, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
Air Wisconsin
[edit]I appreciate what you are trying to do reverting the Air Wisconsin additions and edits I made. I did spend a lot of time trying to make the Air Wisconsin page sound good and remove the management blasting banter that is on there now. Knowledge? Ive worked at AWAC for over 10 years as Captain. The sources are common knowledge, press releases and our executives. CEO Jim Rankin just up and quit to become president of Columbia Helicopters. Pat Thompson has stepped in as interim CEO. I removed the Delta Connection update portion as it was only sent to AWAC employees as an email but has not been officially released to the press. The rest of the updates are only rearranging sentences to make nice sounding coherrant paragraphes and make the the piece flow better. Any additions are common knowledge from my experiences of working there for over decade. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.255.252.215 (talk) 24 November 2014 Having some trouble citing things. The main company website has a lot of the information i posted i can't seem to make the citations work correctly
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, HuffTheWeevil. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Shunting yard algorithm article edit
[edit]Are you sure about this? because say we have two plus operators on the operator stack, there is no point pushing the 1st plus to the queue when when we encounter the 2nd plus, because regardless of what we add first, we'll still get the same answer.
Drotyu (talk) 00:15, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
- Pretty sure. I was doing a kata on Codewars.com that used this algorithm. I literally copied and pasted (and credited) the code from Wikipedia and then translated it to Javascript. It wasn't working at first until I realized the > needed to be a >=. You're right, for two plus signs it doesn't make a difference. But what about two subtraction signs? And division? As always, order matters in those cases. And also, two different operators on the same level, such as multiplication and division. HuffTheWeevil / talk / contribs 03:21, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
Ok then, I agree with what you're saying.
Also, unrelated, I don't know if you're aware of this, but you can use the Template:Reply to template (like this: @HuffTheWeevil:) to send notifications to people. I only saw your reply because I wen't looking for it, otherwise, I would not have seen it because you did not send a notification.
Drotyu (talk) 09:31, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, HuffTheWeevil. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, HuffTheWeevil. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
[I know you haven't edited in a couple of years, but maybe you'll see this even if you read Wikipedia while logged in.]
I've had it in mind for quite some time to write an essay in project space about announcements. I've seen entire sections consisting of sentences with the word "announced" in them, giving the impression that the subject's history consists not of events and actions at all but only of announcements that such events or actions were planned, leaving the reader to wonder whether any of them ever actually happened. I wanted to exhort people who add to an article, in November 2024, "In November 2024 it was announced that X would be joining the series as a regular character in the new season" to return after the new season begins and replace the text about the announcement with "In April 2025, X joined the series as a regular character" or, if X didn't join the series after all, to remove the sentence as probably irrelevant, unless some mention is to be made of why X's addition to the series didn't come to pass.
So one day recently I sat down to begin such an essay, but first checked the status of the obvious shortcut, WP:ANNOUNCED—and found that it leads to your user space essay, which is quite thorough, covering most of the ground that I had in mind. So what I've come to ask is if you would be averse to having your essay moved to project space? Largoplazo (talk) 16:37, 1 December 2024 (UTC)