User talk:Hudsonmohawk
September 2021
[edit]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Adirondack Trust Company. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 15:54, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
This is a false accusation. I’ve gone ahead and recorded your ridiculousness on your talk page. Please don’t write on my talk page unless it’s about something founded and substantive. I don’t have time for frivolous accusations. Your time is better spent debating issues with well cited contributions rather than yourself vandalizing pages you don’t agree with and submitting frivolous delete requests. --Hudsonmohawk (talk) 05:29, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Hudsonmohawk, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi Hudsonmohawk! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 1 October 2021 (UTC) |
October 2021
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Editors are expected to treat each other with respect and civility. On this encyclopedia project, editors assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not appear to do at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adirondack Trust Company. Here is Wikipedia's welcome page, and it is hoped that you will assume the good faith of other editors and continue to help us improve Wikipedia! Hi, please don't attack other users, as you did with It seems that the requester for deletion has ulterior motives
. Its best if you focus on the content, not the people. Thanks, BrxBrx(talk)(please reply with {{SUBST:re|BrxBrx}}) 20:09, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
- @BrxBrx: Thanks I have been on Wikipedia for many many years, but have misplaced my login information. I don't think I attacked another user and reject your accusation. The situation you are interventing in has a greater history than the quote from me you are referencing where I use the phrase, ulterior motives. In particular, the user I was writing to admitted to acting as a vandal and regularly trolls wikipedia to increase his stats as an editor. Please visit the exchange on this topic in greater detail to find that this was an act of warring started by the other user. There is nothing respectful or civil about the other editor nominating the page for deletion and reporting vandalism, when he/she knew that I was in the process of making edits and actively disrupting those edits (more evidence of warring). I have focused on content and the page history reflects this. Your comments on my talk page paint me in a false light by not looking at the other user's behaviors and actions. Did you examine his talk page to see the other users having made complaints (including the ones that he has archived?)? I acknowledge my shortcomings and will work to improve, but I think you are being one-sided. I did not see any comments on his talk page from you. Why is that? I await your reply. Hudsonmohawk (talk) 19:21, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
- Please stop with the personal attacks. I did not "admit to being a vandal," not do I troll Wikipedia to increase my stats. I reverted your edits because you were directly copy/pasting entire paragraphs from a primary source. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 20:07, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
- They are not personal attacks -- it is my experience of your behavior. Admitting you wrongfully reported me for vandalism and apologizing for it mighty close to being a vandal. You do reference your stats and seem to use them so substantiate your bad actions. I've already asked you to stop writing on my talk page. I was exchanging communication with a different user. Please stop stalking me as you seem to be making this personal. Hudsonmohawk (talk) 22:10, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
- @BrxBrx: Thanks I have been on Wikipedia for many many years, but have misplaced my login information. I don't think I attacked another user and reject your accusation. The situation you are interventing in has a greater history than the quote from me you are referencing where I use the phrase, ulterior motives. In particular, the user I was writing to admitted to acting as a vandal and regularly trolls wikipedia to increase his stats as an editor. Please visit the exchange on this topic in greater detail to find that this was an act of warring started by the other user. There is nothing respectful or civil about the other editor nominating the page for deletion and reporting vandalism, when he/she knew that I was in the process of making edits and actively disrupting those edits (more evidence of warring). I have focused on content and the page history reflects this. Your comments on my talk page paint me in a false light by not looking at the other user's behaviors and actions. Did you examine his talk page to see the other users having made complaints (including the ones that he has archived?)? I acknowledge my shortcomings and will work to improve, but I think you are being one-sided. I did not see any comments on his talk page from you. Why is that? I await your reply. Hudsonmohawk (talk) 19:21, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Block
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.