User talk:Hsynylmztr

December 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Turkish Land Forces. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Demetrios1993 (talk) 15:43, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

Your recent editing history at Ali Kemal shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. DeCausa (talk) 11:38, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I provided reliable sources for my edit, including Ali Kemal's own newspapers and memories of contemporary statesmen. However, you keep deleting my entire edit by just saying 'it is not sourced'. You seem to be in an edit war. I studied Ottoman Turkish and I can read Ottoman newspapers. Unlike me who provided many books and Ali Kemal's reports, you do not give any source while deleting my edits. Can you explain which part of my edit is unreliable and how did you decide it as a person who doesn't even speak Turkish? Stop your vandalism and respect the academic information I prove to Wikipedia. I am the one who provides sources so you should use the talk page before reverting my edits. Hsynylmztr (talk) 12:20, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cengizsogutlu, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

- Kevo³²⁷ (talk) 15:38, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Ali Kemal

Hello Hsynylmztr. You've been warned for edit warring at Ali Kemal as a result of your complaint at WP:AN3. You may be blocked if you revert the article again unless you have received a prior consensus for your change on the article talk page. EdJohnston (talk) 16:52, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hsynylmztr, I saw this comment you made at the Edit warring noticeboard. Although it’s not in fact relevant to the situation you are complaining about, actually consensus is more important than sources in determining what is included in an article. This is set out in WP:ONUS which is an important part of our Verifiability policy. DeCausa (talk) 19:09, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Charge (warfare). This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. SN54129 17:43, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 12:09, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions Notification - Kurds and Kurdistan

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the topics of Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

EvergreenFir (talk) 18:21, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Harassment is also a factor in this block. Cullen328 (talk) 18:25, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Hsynylmztr

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Hsynylmztr requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Pavlov2 (talk) 07:21, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]