User talk:Hsnglm
This is Hsnglm's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Your draft article, Draft:Concentrated photovoltaic thermal CPVT
[edit]Hello, Hsnglm. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Concentrated photovoltaic thermal CPVT".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Snowycats (talk) 17:23, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
- I restored this page, for more, see Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion#Concentrated photovoltaic thermal CPVT. Prodego talk 12:05, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Concentrated photovoltaic thermal CPVT (June 5)
[edit]Hello, Hsnglm!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 03:24, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
|
February 2022
[edit]Hello, Hsnglm. We welcome your contributions, but it appears as if your primary purpose on Wikipedia is to add citations to research published by a small group of researchers.
Scientific articles should mainly reference review articles to ensure that the information added is trusted by the scientific community.
Editing in this way is also a violation of the policy against using Wikipedia for promotion and is a form of conflict of interest in Wikipedia – please see WP:SELFCITE and WP:MEDCOI. The editing community considers excessive self-citing to be a form of spamming on Wikipedia (WP:REFSPAM) and the edits will be reviewed and the citations removed where it was not appropriate to add them.
Finally, please be aware that the editing community highly values expert contributors – please see WP:EXPERT. I do hope you will consider contributing more broadly. If you wish to contribute, please first consider citing review articles written by other researchers in your field and which are already highly cited in the literature. If you wish to cite your own research, please start a new thread on the article talk page and add {{requestedit}} to ask a volunteer to review whether or not the citation should be added.
MrOllie (talk) 14:11, 28 February 2022 (UTC)