User talk:Hsmg20
May 2010
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Vince Grella, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.Craddocktm (talk) 14:11, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
Israel
[edit]Hello. This edit left the article broken. Can I ask why you left it that way? Dawnseeker2000 20:53, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
September 2010
[edit] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Süper Lig. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Invisibletr (talk) 18:04, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Süper Lig, you may be blocked from editing. Invisibletr (talk) 15:46, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
- Please stop putting Galatasaray first on the Super Lig page. This shows obvious preference and that has no place on WP. Thank you. Invisibletr (talk) 14:51, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
{{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. You are not a vandal, but your edits are disruptive. There is consensus for the manner in which the articles are laid out (which is alphabetically). Your edits are obviously designed to promote the club you prefer, but the encyclopedia is for everyone and you will not be permitted to disrupt the project. This block is for 12 hours. If you continue to make partisan edits then you will be blocked for longer periods until either you accept the way things are done, or you are unable to edit. Your choice. LessHeard vanU (talk) 21:36, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Why do you keep making disruptive edits to the Süper Lig page? If you are not willing to engage in conversation I will report you to an administrator again. Invisibletr (talk) 12:33, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
October 2010
[edit]{{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. 72 hours block for this edit. I have been advised what the substitute word means, and repeats of this behaviour will result in longer blocks - it doesn't matter how good your other edits are, disruption such as this often leads to vandalism in response as happened here. If there is another episode, then you will be blocked for 2 weeks. LessHeard vanU (talk) 12:43, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
Your editing privileges have been indefinitely suspended
[edit]
{{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. It has been noted that you are capable of valid contributions, so it is unfortunate that you choose to be persistently disruptive in a couple of articles - but the good does not outweigh the effort required in resolving your poor edits, so you are blocked until you can convince someone that you will desist from those behaviours. LessHeard vanU (talk) 21:04, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
- I note that I commented previously the next block would be for 2 weeks - since that appears not to have been sufficient to deter you I have gone for the indefinite tariff. LessHeard vanU (talk) 21:05, 9 October 2010 (UTC)