User talk:Craddocktm

blocking UK Treaties Online

You've blocked the my file Uktreatiesonline.jpg. I have been given permission by the FCO to use this and release it into the public domain. The link to the treaties database is not intended to be an advertisement, the FCO (non-profit making)has given public permmission to a free valuable resource. How do I go about reinstating this? You posted the message below Ashmatin (talk) 17:01, 1 October 2010 (UTC):[reply]

I have tagged your file Uktreatiesonline.jpg up for deletion. Per WP:COPYVIO, material copied from sources that are not public domain or compatibly licensed without the permission of the copyright holder (unless brief quotation used in accordance with non-free content policy and guideline) is likely to be a copyright violation. You have repeatedly copied a file from FCO which is NOT released into the public domain (the FCO made it clear in its term and conditions that any use of its images and logo must be approved). Also, please stop adding the image to various pages because Wikipedia is not a platform for advertisement! If you persist in such behaviour, I will have no choice but to seek administrator intervention, which may result in a block for you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashmatin (talk • contribs) 17:01, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Question for administrator

I recently came across the page res ipsa loquitur, which is a common law principle. The original article contains a list of the state of the doctrine in different jurisdictions, but user Agradman divided the information on different jurisdictions into a number of new pages. I think such a move is completely unconstructive: the new pages are so short and uninformative. There is no hope of expanding them as the doctrines in various jurisdictions do not differ substantially. I think res ipsa loquitur (Hong Kong), res ipsa loquitur (Canada), res ipsa loquitur (United Kingdom), res ipsa loquitur (United States); res ipsa loquitur (Scotland) and res ipsa loquitur (South Africa) should be merged back into the old page and then deleted. Can an administrator help me delete the pages asap? Craddocktm (talk) 14:15, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your question. It would first be necessary to discuss your plans with the users on those pages. Have you tried to talk to Agradman about your thoughts? If the two of you are having a problem reaching an agreement, let me know and we can bring other eyes to the table. You may contact me directly if you need my help. JodyB_talk 17:44, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Craddocktm, thanks for bringing res ipsa loquitur to my attention. I am not adamantly opposed to your deleting these files and consolidating them on a single page, but before you do, I want to raise some caveats & concerns. I will type a brief message at Res ipsa loquitur (Hong Kong) now. Andrew Gradman ^talk/_WP:Hornbook 21:14, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I've posted a response at Res ipsa loquitur (Hong Kong). Andrew Gradman ^talk/_WP:Hornbook 22:10, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal for deletion of Ex parte or in camera

I came across the abovementioned article. Since "ex parte" and "in camera" are very different concepts and since there are articles on both these topics another article is unnecessary. Please discuss deletion of this article. Thank you. Nilotpal42 (talk) 11:18, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Percy?

Is he by any chance a relative? Ohconfucius ^¡digame! 04:16, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You mean Percy Craddock? I'm afraid not lol Craddocktm (talk) 08:46, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Form, style, etc

Hi Craddocktm, nice to see you contributing. Can I suggest you follow this format: OSCOLA? It'll make your life a lot easier! I'll look forward to what you come up with on dishonest assistance. Wik idea 18:46, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bebe

Nah but everyone has said that it was a disappointing debut... I just picked that one as Bebe had a comment on it Lushhhhhhhh (talk) 20:14, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edits

I have read your post. Edits taking place.Anthony of the Desert (talk) 15:16, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Judges' edits

I'm not sure why you removed the "The" in peerage titles, e.g. The Right Honourable (the) Lord Smith. It is part of the peerage title, and should be reflected as such. Regards,--The Taerkasten (talk) 19:02, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Anderson

The UEFA source first appeared in June 2005. Have you read the article it said loaned back. Matthew_hk t c 06:14, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Here is another article from Brazil, first published in June 2005. http://esportes.terra.com.br/futebol/europeu/interna/0,,OI558549-EI2035,00-Anderson+exGremio+acerta+com+o+Porto.html Matthew_hk t c 06:14, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

More correctly Anderson had signed for Porto via Gestifute In June 2005, but the FIFA protection on minor (under-18) prevented him to join the club. And Anderson's mother found in job in Portugal, and made Anderson eligible to immigrate to Portugal for family re-union, thus joined Porto in January 2006, as age 17th. The case seems likes Fabio and Raferal to ManU. Matthew_hk t c 06:45, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No the UEFA article did not say loan back. All it said is he would return to Brazil to REST before the start of the campaign.

The Annual Report 2005/06 of Porto ([1]) p.011 says that Porto took on Anderson in the January transfer window of 2006.
Man United website ([2]) says he joined Porto in Jan 2006.
A much more recent UEFA source ([3]) says that he joined Porto in December 2005.
The Portuguese source seems to say that Anderson was signed by a consortium and then he was DUE to sign for Porto. We couldn't be sure the deal happened according to schedule.

I consider Man Utd and Porto to be the most reliable source since they have first hand access to the player. Craddocktm (talk) 06:50, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If your point on Gestifute is right, it isn't possible for Anderson to join Porto in June 2005, since FIFA rules would make that transfer illegal and void. Therefore, strictly speaking, he was only signed by Gestifute in June 2005 and did not join Porto until January 2006. Craddocktm (talk) 06:54, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It could stated in the article that the deal was pre-agree/ signed a pre-contract in June 2005. In the view point of International Transfer Certificate (ITC)/Transfer windows, Anderson officially joined Porto in January 2006 the opening of Portuguese window, in the view point of contract Anderson signed a contract with GestiFute the agent company and passed the medical in June 2005. Matthew_hk t c 06:55, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fine with me. Craddocktm (talk) 06:59, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

talkback

Hello. You have a new message at ErikHaugen's talk page. Message added 17:02, 11 October 2010 (UTC). Hello. You have a new message at ErikHaugen's talk page. Message added 17:10, 11 October 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Hong Kong meetup

You're invited to the next Hong Kong meetup on 19 August in Think Cafe, Causeway Bay. Please sign up to the meetup on the meta meetup page. Hope to see you there! Der yck C. 16:19, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Invite to the African Destubathon

Hi. You may be interested in participating in the African Destubathon which starts on October 15. Africa currently has over 37,000 stubs and badly needs a quality improvement editathon/contest to flesh out basic stubs. There are proposed substantial prizes to give to editors who do the most articles, and planned smaller prizes for doing to most destubs for each of the 53 African countries, so should be enjoyable! So it would be a good chance to win something for improving stubs on African sportspeople, including footballers, athletes, Olympians and Paralympians etc, particularly female ones, but also male. Even if contests aren't your thing we would be grateful if you could consider destubbing a few African articles during the drive to help the cause and help reduce the massive 37,000 + stub count, of which many are rated high importance (think Regions of countries etc). If you're interested in competing or just loosely contributing a few expanded articles on African Paralympians, Olympians and committees etc, please add your name to the Contestants/participants section. Diversity of work from a lot of people will make this that bit more special. Thanks. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:13, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Asian 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 01:31, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Craddocktm. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]