User talk:Hozro

Vandalism of user pages

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mrandsl (talk) 10:49, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

see http://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Spezial:Logbuch&type=block&page=Benutzer%3AMrandsl Hozro (talk) 13:10, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sperre in de.wiki

Hallo Hozro! Du hast eben meinen Account in der deutschen Wikipedia indef gesperrt mit der Aussage "störsocke in sensiblen themenbereich". Irgendwie kann ich das nicht ganz nachvollziehen. Es tut mir leid, wenn ich irgendwem auf die Füsse getreten bin. Da Du sämtliche Schreibrechte gesperrt hast, kann ich nun noch nicht einmal um eine Sperrprüfung bitten. Dürfte ich darum bitten, mir wenigstens diesen Weg wieder zu eröffnen? --11011 (talk) 16:04, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, das hatte u.a. den Hintergrund, dass nach längerer Ruhe in dem Themenbereich Neue Rechte heute da einiges los war. Was hattest du dir denn bei der Anlage der Kategorie gedacht? --Hozro (talk) 16:24, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Das ist irgendwie nicht mein Tag. Zur Sache: Ich habe in den letzten Tagen ein paar edits als IP gemacht. Dabei ist mir aufgefallen, dass die Kategorien im Bereich rechtsaußen ziemlich chaotisch sind und Personen und Organisationen munter durcheinander gingen. Eigentlich dachte ich, es sei eine gute Idee, ähnlich wie in de:Kategorie:Person des Anarchismus, die Vertreter der Neuen Rechten zusammenzufassen. Hätte nicht gedacht, dass irgendjemand daran Anstoß nehmen könnte. Habe das jetzt als IP auf de.wiki auch zur Sperrprüfung eingestellt. --11011 (talk) 16:50, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ich hab dich entsperrt, Begründung siehe auf DE. Gruß --Hozro (talk) 17:17, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thnx --11011 (talk) 17:26, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Read now Rocky Mountain locust

Entry was referenced with TV Report known by millions already. New Theory of dieng out sure not nonsense thats just wrong meaning of you and others disturbing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kay Uwe Böhm (talk • contribs) 18:27, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"poorly worded and about different subject methinks, improper sourcing" --Hozro (talk) 11:08, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rocky Mountain Locust Entry by Kay Uwe Böhm deleted by VSmith&Hozro and answers from real experts

(Also deleting nonsense of picture of 10 commandments in german Wikipedia from engl. W......... and deleting of diskussion with UvM wrong physician after clearly showed that his entries wrong)

Bad english questions if plant could be reason that locust died answered by experts:::::::::::::

""All good questions….""

The official expert of course is Jeff Lockwood at the University of Wyoming (lockwood@uwyo.edu)

Plant compounds may play a role in hindering populations , but ultimately it’s a game of numbers. Need a large “sink” population to maintain a population, and for them to expand, suitable habitat must exist. The Rocky Mountain Locust may have had very tight/restricted soil nutrient issues that we are unaware of…. And for African locusts… eg Locusta migratoria that do make it to the European continent, proper habitat or microhabitat requirements are not present for them to establish… For example there have been numerous cases of Schistocerca gregaria showing up in Florida, but to my knowledge still have not established.

Does this help to answer your question??

Charles R. Bomar PhD Applied Science Program Director Executive Director, Orthopterists' Society Professor of Biology 331D Jarvis Hall University of Wisconsin-Stout Menomonie, WI 54751 bomarc@uwstout.edu office 715-232-2562 fax 715-232-2192

It does appear that the locust developed slowly/poorly on alfalfa, which was rather widely planted in the late 1800s. So, in part, the use of this plant which was nutritionally suboptimal (probably not ‘poisonous’) may well have contributed to the decline of the locust. Of course, it is not necessary for plowing (or any other single factor) to wipe out every last individual of a species in order for extinction to occur. Our best guess is that the Rocky Mountain locust existed as a meta-population (a network of pocketed populations in which there was limited exchange of individuals among watersheds). If so, then if a sufficient number of the nodes in the network were wiped out, there may have been too few insects to reestablish these populations and sustain the entire meta-population. And in this regard, alfalfa (or other agricultural plants that were not suitable for the locusts—although we don’t have any indication of other such plants) could have contributed to the demise of the species.

JLockwood

I saw about 1 year ago in german TV report on Rocky Mountain Locust Research. I think not likely died out just by plowing more likely by new plant from farmers brought over from Europe. Plant still not geowing in Africa and before not in USA like beetroot, cowberry or tulip. Plants kill insects normally and can kill all not only plowing. In this case they can kill directly poisoning or just stopping swarming out. If it was plant and you find good chance for killing locust in Africa and maybe if coming over in Europe also uselfull to know but plant maybe already reason before in Europe that locust don`t survived here after coming over from africa in history. Plowing will destroy some eggs only not all and not everythere plowing but plant he must only eat. Can you confirm ? Was it right address ?

Kay Kay Uwe Böhm (talk) 18:16, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Alois Brunner

Hi, there. It seems that this picture is correct. If you check this page, for example. Even on the original page, where the image is from if you check the name of the image it's "fp1917brunner.jpg" and not Leo Koch os anyone else. (Here are few other pics: [1], [2], [3], [4]). Thanks. With regards, Oleg. Y. (talk). 02:09, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This website describes the austrian-hungarian Field Pilot's Badge from World War I. Alois Brunner was born in 1912 and was 6 years old at the end of that war. The photo, that's most trustable for me, ist this one. I'm quite sure that's another person, if I take a look at the ears. AFAIK ears don't change, if a person get's older. Best regards --Hozro (talk) 06:45, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sure - I'd be interested as well to ensure we have the right photo. I appreciate the extra effort on this! Thank you. With regards, Oleg. Y. (talk). 13:53, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Hozro. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Hozro. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]