User talk:Kay Uwe Böhm

Welcome!

Hello, Kay Uwe Böhm, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Vsmith (talk) 17:39, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't add promotional (?) material with email address as you have done at Control rod and Pebble bed reactor. Also your parenthetical comment at Neutron capture has been removed, please place comments about article content on the talk page. Vsmith (talk) 17:39, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I've noticed that you have been adding your signature to some of your edits to articles. This is a common mistake to make and has probably already been corrected. There is no need to sign your edits to article content, as the article's edit history serves the function of attributing contributions, so you only need to use your signature to make discussions more readable, such as on article talk pages or project pages such as the Village Pump. If you would like further information about distinguishing types of pages, please see What is an article?. Again, thank you for contributing, and enjoy your Wikipedia experience! Thank you. Syrthiss (talk) 12:41, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Mr. Böhm - we can only add material to the encyclopedia that is properly referenced. I have left your edit in place for now, but since the article for tanthalum doesn't mention its neutron reflectance properties it would be best if you could provide a reference. Regardless of that, please do not add your email address to any more articles. We have been trying to caution you about this for several days it appears. Thanks for your edits. Syrthiss (talk) 13:09, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You were warned above now 3 times. Do not continue to add your email address to articles. Any further attempts, either with this account or with your IP, will be seen as advertising and will cause me to block your account from editing. Syrthiss (talk) 15:10, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits here could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. Syrthiss (talk) 13:58, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is a formal request, in case you aren't reading my edit summaries: please do not post any more content to my talk page. My discussion with you is at an end, for my part. I cannot help you, and can't seem to communicate effectively with you. Regards, Syrthiss (talk) 17:14, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Syrthiss (talk) 11:50, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Kay Uwe Böhm (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

87.165.141.213 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Disruptive editing

Blocking administrator: Syrthiss (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: First of all, you are blocked directly, so you'll need to place {{unblock}} below this message to request unblocking. Secondly, I have no idea what you are trying to say in the text below this. You'll need to communicate clearly in your unblock request. TN X Man 14:19, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kay Uwe Böhm (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This nonsense of you not accepted ! Why are you admimistrator and not writer there ? I was right all the time and you are wrong. So no one will go on editing articles or just wrong nonsense. Content never doubted and just because email address inside with good reason a lot of new materials, designs for keeping my rights was all right. Over form of Copyright you can ask for or insert yourself as some contribution there. (User talk:Vsmith) already let me work through whole article Neutron Capture Normally geologist torchering school boys look at his own side but I`m 49 not at school. Now not added also change of school book explanation for negative temperature coefficient of pebble bed but better german version already. Slowing most moderator not U238 only else pebble bed like corium. Swinging atoms on heat increase collisions pebble bed graphite/11BN.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 17:05, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

tlx|unblock Now Syrthiss talking to VSmith for wrong solidarity not answered with giving wrong information not saying why there was a legal threat if he don`t keep my rights with reference inside anyway just leaving the content cutting my reference by email or suggested other way and not deleting itself after request so deleted by myself in neutron reflector tantalium and blocked also talk with VSmith by myself. Will be moved up to commitee Wikipedia ! I told him also that he is not the Wikipedia just one administrator there. If he says I´m threatening Wikipedia with this this matches exactly to what he does here just destructive inside Wikipedia instead contribution deleting and blocking contribution work. Maybe other adiministrators also not aggree like VSmith on neutron absorber side long time or Ver High Temperature Reactor or Pebble Bed Reactor side 2 before didn`t delete and block after first talks also neutron absorber side materialscientist ? Administrator can insert also again maybe setting right vandalism point for Syrthiss with destructive delting sure most people want what I wrote there inside like like info&link to new reactor from Areva Antares pebble bed reactor in pebble bed reactor else missing information.

tlx|unblock After any Fluffernuter unblocked Syrthiss sitting behind making blocking problem and deleting again. Also pebble bed page after 2 not deleting anymore after talk coming also to this page just delting and blocking after longer time already inside without anybody else deleting/blocking. Wikipedia now without link to new areva antares design and own new design THOR He-11BN-pebble bed Full Zero Risk clearly with my reference and clearly said if other form needed then say how or change also on neutron moderator again. Looks not like most important never email address here for new materials & designs by myself after all compny links are email adress also. Best you go out else information upwards about your behavior without any contribution there !

Syrthiss shows no sign of cooperating and working for wikipedia only against just deleting and making problems without contributions to arcticles like neutron reflector and neutron moderator. To be seen in history and his talk page clearly. If the form of adding a relation to myself for my rights on 3 new materials he could change or say how and same form accepted other sides. If I only extend without name/emailadress also deleted. Adding 3 new materials ... are sure no spamming like forced talk with Syrthiss then blocking himself.

I just worked through whole article neutron capturing fully changed corrected and many additions also 2 new absorber materials and removing hard failures like splitting of 3He->T/10B-Li+? by definition no capturing real 3He->4He and 10->11B. Another deleted from same author also lead as absorber because spalling(scattering) right. Also removed samarium only 149Sm from fission...

Added absobers also from control rod list and reconfirming all right and nice croos capture(absorber) chart 10B/11B much more and details correction like adding to stable position also near stable... or adding how to make gold to how to destroy and add the end for what all usefull in practice ther maybe only at the end maybe to much but informing to related things definitions first.

11BN new breakthrough material found by myself about 6 months before working since years on burning protection and Thor Full Zero Risk He-11BN-pebble bed HTR design before graphite+burning protection layers like SiC/BeO so also very important for pebble bed HTR future and security 11BN not burns....... also new moderator high pressured dense helium at danger away without danger commenting suggested CH4 from 2003 addition changing to 14CT4 radioactive and explosive but possible so far not used. Try adding also warnings on use of 93% U like in www.thtr.de 5g <19% U 10g Th enough so no proliferation problem and no A-bomb with dividung risk for UO2/ThO2 in burning/melting case is unknown new warning.

Also I add just BeO as moderator also for pebbles just deleted and no comment.

Also extensions to (very high temperature/pebble bed reactor for new AREVA ANTARES design with link and THOR with easy & usefull by kayuweboehm(at)yahoo.de last in moderator Kay Uwe Böhm All Rights Reserved also just deleted not more. Latest version without link for requestioning & nothing everybody thinks first without rights there. Sometimes administrator school boy interrested in chess !

Kay

cite-errors on the fukushima wiki

In your last edit you added a few references to the wiki about the fukushima disaster, not all your references do work, could you please look into this, because now these references cannot all be checked or controlled references: 19 and 22 do not work... please could you make a little addition, about the total emissions there is also a recent french report, with some hge figures1947enkidu (talk) 18:33, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ihr English ist nicht ganz klar fuer mich, so bitte gerne auch auf Deutsch, dann koennte beser verstehen was Sie meinen. Ich hab selber auf nicht alle Kentnisse nicht wie wir dass besser tun sollen, aber ich wird ein Versuch machen.

Und... das Deutsch soll auch verschwinden aus alle Texten...

here an useful link: http://www.thebulletin.org/search/google?cx=001946741175186368094%3Adukqgnm1ooe&cof=FORID%3A11&form_token=a521ef17a45066fd54156897b0da206d&form_id=google_cse_results_searchbox_form&query=fukushima&op.x=0&op.y=0#843

Gruesse 1947enkidu (talk) 20:18, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've found the three places where the text is missing, there the original sources need to be found... I try to do my best, but these might be to be found in the German original 1947enkidu (talk) 17:42, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 15:27, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've found the three places where the link is missing... but I would not know how to restore those, do you have any additional info greetings 1947enkidu (talk) 13:29, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Neutron absorbers

The ref was used because the absorbers are new from myself with my rights on material use.Kay Uwe Böhm (talk) 13:20, 1 November 2011 (UTC) Hello, the ref tag with name attribute is not for signing your edits. The page's history will show what edits were made by whom. Instead, the ref tag is for citing references of inlcuded statements. The name form allows you to refer to a previous reference where the complete details have been included, making it easier to cite a single reference in multiple places. --Belg4mit (talk) 01:50, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You might find it helpful to see my response to your earlier inquiry at User talk:belg4mit. --Belg4mit (talk) 01:57, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

COI & RS

VSmith is no reliable source and adminstrator with his watched sides wrong. Lead is no reflector or absorber because scattering and tantalum/11BN... new by myself reference rights on material and designs not text must be kept and recheck by real experts wanted. Just deleting all is vandalism. Work would be contacting adder of control rods list already confirmed by myself not VSmith. 87.165.143.34 (talk) 14:31, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:RS and WP:COI. We don't promote our own work on Wikipedia. I've removed your recent additions to Very high temperature reactor for self-promotion and lack of reliable sources. Your email address and "all rights reserved" do not constitute a reliable source. Please use published sources as references. Vsmith (talk) 02:24, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And for that matter, consider very carefully before you accuse another editor of "vandalism." Making accusations like that without very good evidence is a violation of our no personal attacks policy. (And Vsmith wasn't "just deleting" at all; he explained his deletions with edit summaries, which you can see in that page's edit history.) CityO fSilver 20:07, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Again, repeatedly adding material with an invalid reference as follows: New Materials and Designs All Originator Rights Reserved by Kay Uwe Böhm (email address) – simply won't work. It is not a reference. I agree that Wikipedia User:Vsmith is not a reliable source and neither is Wikipedia User:Kay Uwe Böhm. If the information can be sourced to a published verifiable publication, fine - use the publication as a reference. Then we can work on article wording and discuss the details -- when we have a valid reference. Just repeatedly adding the same unsourced material is edit warring and you need to read WP:3rr regarding that. Vsmith (talk) 21:10, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Summaries

Hi there. When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field – please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you. Regards, 220.101.30 talk^\edits (aka 220.101) 15:42, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

gerne Deutsch

Better english because bad german and I did`t not write without any damage but not dangerous. Also Fukushima plant did hold quakes about 10 years before also this quake and after quakes, reason for disaster was tsunami and mistake not fully closed >30m secure easy possible older plants germany already or new EPR or other plants in japan build later. After IAEA 0 deaths !

Lieber Kay, Ich verstehe auch Deutsch, vielleicht ist es besser, alles in Deutsch zu schreiben. vielleicht mit alle original Links, dann kann ich alles pruefen, und ein Geschichte davon machen, Wann Sie versuchen English zu schreiben, verstehe ich ja gar nicht was Sie meinen, English mit eine deutsche Grammatik dass ist mir ein bischen schwer... Vielleicht ist es auch moeglich zuerst gleich mit Email mit einander zu unterhalten ? ohne diese Website zu verwenden ? 1947enkidu (talk) 13:49, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wass meinen Sie mit: All plants in Japan hold quake 9.0 oldest Tepco not tsunami.

Diess ist nicht gutes English, und wird bald weggenommen, Niemand wird diss verstehen....

Alle Reactoren sollen ein Erdstoss starke 9.0 Richter ohne Problehmen oder Beschaedigung ertragen ? All nuclear plants in Japan should be able to endure a 9.0 quake without damage to the reactor ? The oldest TEPCO-reactor NOT TSUNAMI ??

actually three reactors could not withstand the tsunami, after the flood all electric motors were in the water, and no electric motor can work than, even when the diesel-engines had been working... and even if the out-side power-lines had not been wiped out and still working, the plant could not been saved...

Herzlichen Gruesse 1947enkidu (talk) 14:10, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is custom adding comments after all comments before, and taking each time a double-dot extra, I did not mean I could write Germanisch without any mistakes, but your english has the same trouble... Everytime the adits can be followed back, and when you do need the text, you can go back even 10 or 20 edits, and let them appear on your sceen, 1947enkidu (talk) 15:57, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Very high temperature reactor...

{{unblock|reason= Not blocked is writing but always deleted... No real answer by [[User talk:Fox|Joseph '''Fox''']] see later and Syrthiss own side http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Syrthiss ehows clearly no expert control om neutron reflector capture... What can you do if VSmith deletes always entry of new reactors like Areva Antares design with link to Areva side and new THOR ? VSmith after own side geologist if true but ecologist themes...! Also just disturbing on neutron absorber, moderator, reflector& window sides. Also not answering how to insert copyright not for text just new materials and designs. Hidden talk from Syrthiss to VSmith. After rework and scientific correction neutron capture with hard mistakes like lead absorber or 3He splitting to Tritium and 10B splitting to Lithium+? not corrected long time since June 2010 VSmith deleting and asking for reference on explaned how to make gold not only destroy like before and writing own new 10BN like already used for control rods use planned only for trimmimg pebbles, stoppsand & stoppbowl. 196Hg+n->197Hg or 198Hg-n->197Hg ß- 64h 197Au gold planned for breeder Kalkar already now not inside like new break through material for pebble bed HTR 11BN boron nitride or high pressured dense helium as moderator at danger away without danger or chrome/11BN instead zircaloy with Zr+H2O+heat->H2 missed ! copyright email adress also no answer ! Wikipedia is in danger from administrators like VSmith+Syrthiss also international atomic security ! EPR better also no zircaloy and HfC layer 3890° broad band absorber for ramp and core catcher. >30m tsunami security easy everywhere just close ! Don`t use 1g 93% U + 10g Th like THTR 300 5g <19%U+6g th enough because dividing risk ThO2/UO2. Don`t use Pu until 100% burning security like with 11BN+stoppsand in pebble bed HTR. SiC or BeO layer possible against burning on (sub)peblles+walls introduced by myself before only used against outgoings. I stopped ESCOM PBMR years ago with email to Escom, African Union, IAEA... but aksing for restart with 11BN and THOR design for Full Zero Risk ! Fukushima 0 deaths IAEA but mistakes not made old german plants and EPR before ! RBMK very unsecure bad reactor 18-20s -50/60% instead <2s -90% no graphite.... ! Inform russians to improve and better BN/WWER 1200 OKMB or change stopprods, graphite with 11BN/He add stoppsandsystem with gun SiO2+HfC+Mo+Ti... not only swimming upon B4C, no lead against gamma melting away just 2-3m sand gamma dense after liquid concrete gun. EPR wished break with catcher for new constructions... You must build much more atomoc power worldwide security to be solved and solvable on outgoing oil+gas+coal near future and much to less from green energy else deaths ! [[User:Kay Uwe Böhm|Kay Uwe Böhm]] ([[User talk:Kay Uwe Böhm#top|talk]]) 16:06, 8 November 2011}}

(UTC)|decline=I have absolutely positively no idea what you just wrote. — Joseph Fox 16:14, 8 November 2011 (UTC)}}[reply]

Your block expired more than ten days ago. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:38, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to my talk page

I have undone your recent edit to my talk page because you modified another user's comments and interspersed your comments within other comments. If you have something to say, please append to your latest comment at the end of the page with a break or start a new section. Please take the time to learn the Wikipedia customs and policies. Thank you, Vsmith (talk) 21:44, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

heads up: Broken reference

Your edit here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fukushima_Daiichi_nuclear_disaster&diff=next&oldid=458158137

seems to have broken the references slightly with an unresolved "nisa-2011-06-07b" reference.

I'm not sure what happened, otherwise I would have fixed it. Any chance you could take a look? Many thanks.Teapeat (talk) 01:30, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

Hi, your continued adding of material to the lead of Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster after it has been reverted by multiple editors is WP:Edit warring. Please propose changes to the article on the talk page and get consensus for your edits. If you continue to add this without discussion you will be blocked. Mikenorton (talk) 19:40, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Stop vandalism

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Shinkolobwe (talk) 23:52, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notification

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. rdfox 76 (talk) 04:06, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Last warning

Last warning is a legal law suit if you keep content with my rights on inside neutron capture... clearly molybdenum and ytterbium and Mo2B5 not from you inside there also how to make gold... ! Rights are on the material use suggested and must be referenced to myself ! I had only work with your deleting of long table fully referenced entry at Fukushima Disaster and unbelievable reasoning. You wanted keep also 3 tables and pictures without rights and why I should make ore amybody else a citation for how to make gold already explained inside just look uner 197HG eps ! And unblock so I can delete whats from myself not yourself special with rights by law on it clear and said !

Hi Kay. I can see that you are trying to help but unfortunately your edits at present are just creating more work for others to clean up. I have a couple of suggestions for you.

You could try to get a mentor. This is someone who helps you to better understand how we work here. Let me know if you are interested in this; I cannot help you myself but I might be able to find someone for you.
I get the impression that English is not your first language. I don't know where you live but it may be that there is somewhere you can get help with improving your English. I know several editors who have taken this path. At the moment, your English is not of a standard that allows you to improve our project.
And a related suggestion; I don't know what your first language is, but it may be worth considering contributing to a version of Wikipedia written in that language. Again, let me know if you need help with this.

What is very clear to me however is that you must not continue with your current editing pattern. If you ignore this warning and continue I will have no alternative but to block your account indefinitely. I would do this with a heavy heart because I know that your intentions are good, but I would do it nevertheless to prevent damage to our project and needless work being created for volunteers. --John (talk) 11:52, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. GraemeL ^(talk) 18:19, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

After multiple warnings, this was totally unacceptable. --GraemeL ^(talk) 18:20, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That was unfortunate and per my warning above I have extended your block to indefinite. --John (talk) 18:23, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kay Uwe Böhm (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Nonsense just deleting tables and writting wrong text inside at Fukushima Daichii Nuclear Disaster: Tables are long time inside and fully referenced at all 3 and 4 pictures on side of section table reasoning just said for changing content as last to long but what before shorter ? Looks like anti-atom movement tries edit block

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information.
Note also comments below by User:Northumbrian. No unblock request can proceed while the legal threat remains on this page - it must be removed or struck out, and you must acknowledge that you cannot make legal threats. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 23:38, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note to Kay and to block-reviewing admins

Kay, I've fixed your malformed unblock request above, so that it will show up in the list of unblock requests and receive a response. However, in light of this legal threat, it is a certainty that you will not be unblocked, in accordance with Wikipedia's No Legal Threat policy, unless you completely retract the threat of legal action.

You also need to understand that you license your contributions for public re-use whenever you click the Save button after an edit.

John gave you some very good advice under the Last Warning heading above. Should you be unblocked, you might consider heeding it.

Best of luck, NORTHUMBRIAN SPRǢC 23:30, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Stopp nonsense get out and read yourself Im `long tome editor already here much still inside ! 84.173.128.133 (talk) 14:21, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kay Uwe Böhm (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You or Wikipedia must delete content from myslef with my rights inside at neutron capture side for molydenum, ytterbium and Mo2B5 or unblock for I can delete myself or keeping reference that anti atom deleted tables at Fuksushima Disaster.... clearly wrong thats disruptive editing also delting references but keeping content. Edit sides long time already: neutron capture, reflector, moderator, window=cllading material fuel rod side, control rod, Rocky Mountain Locust and Fukushima disaster with 3 tables 4 pictures and much more many new details from spektrum article and german wikipedia fully referenced inside and AREVA help side, also addings at pebble bed side with new Arewva Antares +double reference+ own THOR design and additions to THTR 300 section aslo in discussion inside just attacked by Shinkolobwe and friends without success outside wikipedia telling "likely a first catatstrophe" with historical quake and killer tsunami with about 28 000 deaths and 300 000 homless hitting full at Fukushima going over 5.7m tsunami wall breaking 10m high doors of plant. Also long time before for ankles 2000-6000mSv instead 2-3Sv and letting away not confirmed like same order of magnitude together instead only up to 75% peaks of chernobyl without not confirmed by tables... desinformation and sure not encylopadic. If anyone also makes lawsuit against right calling Wikipedia still an encyclopedia unclear if blocked and controlled with wrong content by anti-atom+nonsense people like arch dude, 1exec1, Shinkolobwe, LikeLakers2 coming new on all other long time edited sides deleting of course with VSmith... welcoming them like Hozro on locust side. Not cleared Wikipedia nonsense shithouse missing news and wrong maybe serios looking content destroyed from inside. I don`t edit anymore if not cleared like many others not Arch Dude... but molybdenum... must be deleted special by VSmith... if still on side amking reentry without reference because who is Arch Dude...,IP? You must inform VSmith or unblock ! Kay Uwe Böhm (talk) 13:25, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your request has reached the level of complete gibberish, and unfortunately I think it's time not just to decline them but to cut you off from this talk page. — Daniel Case (talk) 13:59, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

93.221.217.167 (talk)

another IP-address is used by this uwe: 93.221.217.167 (talk) see: [1] 1947enkidu (talk) 14:23, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And just now, 217.229.2.170 posted their Fukushima Daiichi screed on the talkpage instead. rdfox 76 (talk) 17:39, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kay Uwe Böhm, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Jasper Deng (talk) 22:35, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]