User talk:HorrorProfessor

Wikipedia:WikiProject Horror

Hi HorrorProfessor, welcome to Wikipedia. You may wish to have a look at Wikipedia:WikiProject Horror, a small but select group whom you may find like minded. Happy editing. Gog the Mild (talk) 18:56, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You probably know this - Wikipedia:Simplified ruleset - but worth a skim. Gog the Mild (talk) 19:24, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Josef Mengele, you may be blocked from editing. . Please do not add material without sources as you have one Josef Mengele and The Gestapo's Last Orgy. If you want to add information on wikipedia, you require a reliable source. Your past edits have failed to do so. Andrzejbanas (talk) 13:13, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

So I cannot add content to an introduction on an article? When other pieces of that introduction are also without citation? And I cannot add content to lengthen the plot of a film? From the Article on Wikipedia: Bullying. "On Wikipedia, all editors have fair and equal rights to editing all articles, project pages, and all other parts of the system. While some may have more knowledge or familiarity with a topic than others, this does not mean those with less Wikipedia jargon are at a lower level, or not entitled to their point of view." Some of your reversals of my edits, are I believe, well beyond any grounds that you have been citing. Instead, why don't you attempt to engage with me in constructive debate, perhaps on the numerous article 'talk pages' instead of just undoing an amount of hard work? How would you like it if I stalked your edits and perpetually undid them without any attempt at a prior meaningful debate? Ask intelligent questions instead of just wading in and making threats. Thanks.

You added information about the geography on various articles on Nazi soldiers and added information about the death of certain directors and actors without a source. Andrzejbanas (talk) 13:20, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I would suggest reading WP:RS, WP:OR and MOS:FILM. The information you are adding is predominantly unsourced and falls under WP:OR for original research. That's why your edits have been removed. Andrzejbanas (talk) 13:21, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I stated in the introduction of the Mengele article - that he fought on the Ukrainian and Russian fronts, which is sourced in the main body of the article? How is expanding an introduction a disruptive edit? You have a serious attitude problem. Wikipedia is not your personal domain. Stop stalking me.

You've made several edits in a row without attributing sources. Whether you are trying to improve the material or not, it is vandalism. You just edited the same article twice adding the same information that I know is not sourced in the article. If you have a source, use it. If not, find one first. Did you read the rule pages I suggested? Andrzejbanas (talk) 13:24, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not every piece of information needs a source; for example the plot of a film. It seems whatever I do is never right in your opinion. What you are doing has been partly constructive, but I feel you are now starting to stalk me and find fault in particular articles where there is none.

That's true about the plot in most cases per MOS:FILM, but you have been adding several bits of information to several articles without a source. Either a) incorrectly as you did in Eyes Without a Face, or b) without a source about important information such as the cause of death of Batzella, the production countries of films, and tossing in your own reviews of whats a better title for a film. I know you are trying to improve the articles, and you are trying to make them better, but you still need to follow the rules. If you have questions, I'd be happy to help.Andrzejbanas (talk) 13:33, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Pleasure Shop on 7th Avenue moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, The Pleasure Shop on 7th Avenue, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. b uidhe 19:52, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Carl Tighe, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Andrzejbanas (talk) 05:42, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kaput Lager – Gli ultimi giorni delle SS moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kaput Lager – Gli ultimi giorni delle SS, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 02:55, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

~~== ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message ==

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. Andrzejbanas (talk) 22:42, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ian Barnes

The article Ian Barnes has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Theroadislong (talk) 13:39, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Ian Barnes has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ian Barnes. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 14:23, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Ian Barnes has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ian Barnes. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 14:31, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Ian Barnes has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ian Barnes. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 15:51, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Ian Barnes has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ian Barnes. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 16:11, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ian Barnes (February 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Amkgp was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for academics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The draft needs to be supported by references that are independent, not by his publications only, for verifiability of data stated.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ian Barnes and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ian Barnes, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Amkgp 💬 17:25, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, HorrorProfessor! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — Amkgp 💬 17:25, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kevin Bampton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The Pleasure Shop on 7th Avenue

Hello, HorrorProfessor. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Pleasure Shop on 7th Avenue".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:04, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Hi HorrorProfessor! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Abdullah Ahmed Abdullah that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. -- Tamzin (they/she) | o toki tawa mi. 13:57, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Kaput Lager – Gli ultimi giorni delle SS

Hello, HorrorProfessor. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kaput Lager – Gli ultimi giorni delle SS, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:03, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kaput Lager – Gli ultimi giorni delle SS

Hello, HorrorProfessor. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kaput Lager – Gli ultimi giorni delle SS".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:00, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ian Barnes

Hello, HorrorProfessor. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ian Barnes, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 19

An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Claude Lanzmann, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page North Korean.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:52, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]