User talk:Horrified895

Welcome!

Hi Horrified895! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 01:41, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm VickKiang. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. VickKiang (talk) 02:47, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Controversial topic area alerts

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

— Newslinger talk 23:10, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Alex Jones, you may be blocked from editing. - FlightTime (open channel) 23:11, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Unbh. I noticed that you recently removed content from List of Lionsgate films (2010–2019) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Unbh (talk) 05:14, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. VickKiang (talk) 06:40, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Margaret D. Foster, you may be blocked from editing. Unbh (talk) 12:51, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dec 2023

Hello.

The edits you made on the somerset bridlewood station page were wrong... I literally provided a citation for it, the quality on calgary imagery is very bad especially if we are talking about 1996 so that isn't proof that it didn't exist anyways i will add better sources since you couldnt be bothered to check it yourself. Taorenxuan (talk) 11:09, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jan 2024

Hello.

The edits you made on the somerset bridlewood station page were wrong... I literally provided a citation for it, the quality on calgary imagery is very bad especially if we are talking about 1996 so that isn't proof that it didn't exist anyways i will add better sources since you couldnt be bothered to check it yourself. Taorenxuan (talk) 12:09, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello.

The edits you made on the somerset bridlewood station page were wrong... I literally provided a citation for it, the quality on calgary imagery is very bad especially if we are talking about 1996 so that isn't proof that it didn't exist anyways i will add better sources since you couldnt be bothered to check it yourself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Taorenxuan (talk • contribs) 22:59, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]