User talk:Hong12kong

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Hong12kong! Thank you for your contributions. I am EWikist and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! EW_{_i}kist^Talk 02:50, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from Hong Kong! Learning the ropes, doing a little RC Patrol ... Hong12kong (talk) 09:22, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Hong12kong, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Sarah (talk) 20:17, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Hong12kong. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Ryan Vesey Review me! 22:44, 15 May 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Please fill out our brief Teahouse guest survey

Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts and staff at WP:Teahouse would like your feedback! We have created a brief survey meant to help us better understand the experience of new editors on Wikipedia. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you edited the Teahouse Questions or Guests pages sometime in the last few months.

Click here to be taken to the survey site.

The survey should take less than 10 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!

Happy editing,

J-Mo, Teahouse host

This message was sent via Global message delivery on 00:31, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

July 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not replace pages with blank content, as you did with this edit to Talk:Douglas Robinson, as this is confusing to readers. The page's content has been restored for now. If there is a problem with the page, it should be edited or reverted to a previous version if possible; if you think the page should be removed entirely, see further information. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:00, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse confusion, that talk page should no longer redirect. Removed redirect code, and replaced with project disambiguation template. Hong12kong (talk) 10:57, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Masculinism

Wikipedia doesn't like WP:EDITWAR and since you have been revert by several editors, you need to stop reverting against multiple editors and go to the talkpage to discuss your edits. Also, have you read the article cited? Are you sure that you are correct in your facts? Because this summary of the research suggests that your reverts are in fact incorrect, and that preschool boys are given more freedom in the classroom with regard to noise, activity, Unless you have some other evidence to counter I would suggest that you revert your edit.Slp1 (talk) 01:05, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you had already started discussing on the talkpage while I was posting this. So, you can ignore that part of the message. But you still likely need to revert back, since based on the article and the summary I point to, the original version was actually correct. Note that the section is in the "criticism" section --Slp1 (talk) 01:10, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Yes, Kevin Gorman already reverted the passage back--but note that "the original version" was the one I was reverting to, in the (mistaken) belief that it was correct! As I explained on the Masculism talk page, I was defending the coherence of the WP article, but without actually reading the source. Once I read the source, I realized that the original version was wrong--wrong, that is, as a paraphrase of the source--and I was wrong to defend it. If the source is accurately paraphrased, then the entire paragraph becomes inappropriate for the Masculism entry, and should be cut. Hong12kong (talk) 08:49, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this and your other note. Just to clarify one thing. If you check the history, you'll see that the longstanding "original (and accurate) version" is what it says now. It was changed by an IP yesterday [1], and you twice reverted back to this incorrect formulation.

The whole thing is a good example of the need to check the sources before restoring information, even what seems like vandalism at times. Editors are held responsible the content of their edits even when they are reverting others. Please don't worry about though; it is an easy mistake to make fairly early in one's wiki career!! Slp1 (talk) 12:13, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Okay thanks! (I could have sworn I'd seen the paragraph the way I was reverting it back to, a week or two ago, when I was first working on the page ...) Hong12kong (talk)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Hong12kong. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Hong12kong. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Hong12kong. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gulliver's Voyage to Phantomimia moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Gulliver's Voyage to Phantomimia, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:37, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gulliver's Voyage to Phantomimia (December 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See WP:NBOOK

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gulliver's Voyage to Phantomimia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Gulliver's Voyage to Phantomimia, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 22:35, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Gulliver's Voyage to Phantomimia

Hello, Hong12kong. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gulliver's Voyage to Phantomimia, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:02, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]