User talk:Honeybrowneyes

Proposed deletion of The Magic Sapphire

The article The Magic Sapphire has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet the requirements of Wikipedia:Notability (books). No in-depth coverage in reliable third-party sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pichpich (talk) 14:23, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Magic Sapphire for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Magic Sapphire is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Magic Sapphire until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Pichpich (talk) 13:12, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Article is edited extensively and all the efforts have been made to make this article appropriate under the guidelines. I have tried out everything to match this article to the guidelines of Wikipedia.This would be a firm request to close this discussion and remove the deletion policy template if the article has reached till your satisfactions.

- User:Honeybrowneyes.

Here I also show the things I added to my article:

1. A table giving information on the book. 2. A lot more about the Gurukul in which Abirami Forbes live. 3. Checked whole article improving the grammar. 4. Wrote a Rank for the book. 5. Mentioned the references. 6. mentioned the external links. 7. Did my best to make this article a good article. Yours Sincerely, User: Honeybrowneyes.

Well... the only problem is that nobody is questioning that the book exists, just whether or not it is notable per WP:NBOOK. It's rather hard for books to achieve notability, especially ones that are released through smaller publication houses. What shows notability is not the book's ranking on merchant sites such as Amazon, the grammar, or any of the above things that you've mentioned above. What book articles need are sources from independent and reliable places to show notability. A reliable source would be an article about the book that was written by a recognized newspaper such as the New York Times or the Sacramento Bee. Reviews can count, but only if they're published in reliable publications such as a newspaper or a site such as the A.V. Club. The majority of review blogs cannot be used as a reliable source because the bloggers aren't considered to be authorities on the subject. This isn't a knock against bloggers, just that they almost never fit what Wikipedia considers to be an authoritative source. Even the more well known book blogs such as the long-running Book Chick City site isn't considered a reliable source per Wikipedia, so this makes it a lot harder to find sources. As far as things released by the publisher, author, or anyone involved in the book, those would be considered primary sources and cannot show notability. There are other ways that books can meet notability guidelines, but those are far harder to meet and even then they would still need reliable sources from independent and reliable sources to prove that they meet those guidelines. Hope this helps!Tokyogirl79 (talk) 12:59, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse

Hello! Honeybrowneyes, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. An awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! Keilana|^{Parlez ici} 16:46, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, thanks Tokyogirl179 for your kind advice and help. Oh, it helped me to know the standard for Wikipedia. I may try to find the reliable sources. User:Honeybrowneyes.

Your edits to various date pages

Hi and welcome! Just a quick note to let you know that a lot of those pages you just edited added some redundant information about national days. They've been reverted but they were obviously done in good faith so there's no trouble. Cheers! RA0808 ^talk _contribs 14:29, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Christian molina

The article Christian molina has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 13:53, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Where "Honey Brown Eyes Contributions" is.

It's here.--Shirt58 (talk) 09:36, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Help

Please members of wiki, help me. My title for the book Radiance has not gone so right. I want to change it. Please i request that someone can edit it then go to Riley Bloom Series and there open the link Radiance. Its really a mess. User:HoneyBrownEyes 04:49, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Here it is. Is that what you were hoping to get fixed? --Shirt58 (talk) 10:30, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Christian Molina (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Gimlet

Radiance (book) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Macmillan

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:06, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the links you added up. I understand that I am so new here that i haven't learnt everything till now and I really like when someone helps me here. HoneyBrownEyes 3:13, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Riley Bloom Series, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Macmillan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:39, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Radiance.jpeg.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Radiance.jpeg.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [1], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Kelly ^hi! 13:54, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Elizabeth Amber

I hate to both you, but there are still some issues with this article, which needs better sourcing, such as page numbers for the magazine reviews. Bearian (talk) 16:41, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January calendar

{{January calendar}} is gone, replaced by {{calendar}}. I noticed that you are using it. I hope you don't mind if I fix things up. Jimp 09:56, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Abecedare (talk) 00:42, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment at Talk:The Kashmir Files

I have reverted your comment from this talkpage since it was non-constructive. If you have a specific suggestions for changes to be made to the article (supported by reliable sources) you are welcome to discuss them at the discussion page but I'd recommend brushing up on wikipedia's content and talkpage guidelines before you do so. Abecedare (talk) 00:46, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. Thanks. I’ll brush up on the guidelines. Honeybrowneyes (talk) 03:27, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]