User talk:Holy whit

Welcome!

Hello, Holy whit, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for helping us build a great free encyclopedia. We have five basic principles, but other than that, we advise that you be bold and edit. If you ever have any questions or need help, feel free to leave a message at the help desk, and other Wikipedia editors will be happy to assist you.

Thanks again and congratulations on becoming a Wikipedian!

P.S. New discussion threads for you will appear at the bottom of this page.

Whitfield family

Hello Holy whit,

It seems to me that an article you worked on, Whitfield family, may be copied from http://genforum.genealogy.com/whitfield/messages/1556.html. It's entirely possible that I made a mistake, but I wanted to let you know because Wikipedia is strict about copying from other sites.

It's important that you edit the article and rewrite it in your own words, unless you're absolutely certain nothing in it is copied. If you're not sure how to fix the problem or have any questions, there are people at the help desk who are happy to assist you.

Thank you for helping build a free encyclopedia! MadmanBot (talk) 04:19, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve William Whitfield II

Hi, I'm I dream of horses. Holy whit, thanks for creating William Whitfield II!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. I've added some tags to the article.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 04:43, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (William Whitfield III) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating William Whitfield III, Holy whit!

Wikipedia editor DocumentError just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

good job

To reply, leave a comment on DocumentError's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

File source problem with File:Pask.png

Thank you for uploading File:Pask.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:06, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of William Whitfield I

The article William Whitfield I has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG. No sign of non-trivial coverage in reliable sources. Notability is not inherited; Wikipedia is not a genealogical site.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:53, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]