Jump to content

User talk:Hollygirl78

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:JerryGumbert.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Raywil (talk) 05:05, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from File:JerryGumbert.jpg, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. In regards to your question, please use an image copyright tag. (See WP:ICT) Raywil (talk) 05:24, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:THeaton.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:THeaton.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 08:03, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:KipCassino.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Eeekster (talk) 03:59, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Borrell Associates and Kip Cassino

[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Hollygirl78, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Please be careful when you add to articles about topics you are involved with. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, and therefore does not allow anything that reads like an advertisement. Text like the second half of Kip Cassino and most of Borrell Associates, are normally removed on sight. Seeing that you are new to Wikipedia, I didn't want to do this because it might have looked rude. Instead, I would like to invite you to rephrase these articles yourself, ideally after reading these parts of our policy:

If you need help, please don't hesitate to contact me. I am watching your talk page (this page), so I will notice if you put a question here. Thank you. --ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 12:43, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

P.S.: The same applies to Terry Heaton and Jerry Gumbert. Please don't take this whole thing personally – my aim here is to help building a reliable and impartial encyclopaedia, and you are very welcome to help. There are just a few rules to observe. Thanks, ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 13:16, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kip Cassino

[edit]

The article Kip Cassino has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails notability due to lack of reliable sources. All references are to blogs, directories, or self-published pages about the company. None are specifically about the subject of this biography.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kudpung (talk) 07:27, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Borrell Associates for deletion

[edit]

A discussion has begun about whether the article Borrell Associates, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Borrell Associates until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Christopher Connor (talk) 13:52, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jerry Gumbert for deletion

[edit]

A discussion has begun about whether the article Jerry Gumbert, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jerry Gumbert until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Christopher Connor (talk) 13:55, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Terry Heaton for deletion

[edit]

A discussion has begun about whether the article Terry Heaton, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terry Heaton until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Christopher Connor (talk) 14:03, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Borrell Associates

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Borrell Associates, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Thparkth (talk) 16:32, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FYI conflict of interest guideline

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia in Borrell Associates, Gordon Borrell, Terry Heaton, Jerry Gumbert, Kip Cassino, or other articles, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

  1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
  2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
  3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. – Athaenara ✉ 20:57, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Borrelllogo.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Borrelllogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:37, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Hello,

I have noticed that all of my pages that I've created have been deleted. I am really stunned. Terry Heaton, Jerry Gumbert, Kip Cassino, Gordon Borrell, and Borrell Associates are true movers and shakers in the world of local media. All are deeply involved in moving old media to new media and are actively promoting and causing enormous innovations in the world of media -- you know, things like Wikipedia. Some of the commentary from editors has been really appalling. A walled garden of spam? Conflict of interest? I've only ever even met one of these people in person and I live about a thousand miles away from all of them. I am a stay-at-home wife on no one's payroll. And offline sources aren't ok? So if you get quoted in the Wall Street Journal or some other article that doesn't put every word of every article online, that's not good enough? After reading everything left here, I can kinda sorta see why some of this happened -- but Terry Heaton, who is an author on tons of college syllabi, a university professor, an expert in the field, appears to have been deleted simply because I wrote his page. This is a grave injustice and seems to suggest that Wikipedia is ruled by a small group of editors with nothing else going on in their lives, rather than objective standards. Further, his page was up for a couple of YEARS. Why now? I honestly thought I was what Wikipedia is all about -- an ordinary person with a deep interest and passion in a subject adding to the collective knowledge of the world by organizing that information in one place. This is gravely disappointing, sad and sick, and I guess now I see why my stepkids' teachers don't allow Wikipedia as a source for anything.

Please tell me I'm wrong. This is soooooo disappointing.

Holly

Hollygirl78 (talk) 17:32, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

[edit]
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for spamming or advertising. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

--Orange Mike | Talk 17:18, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Hollygirl78&oldid=1068414692"