User talk:Holly Richardson

Welcome!

Hello, Holly Richardson, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited was Antiques Trade Gazette, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The plain and simple conflict of interest guide
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! 331dot (talk) 22:46, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Hello Holly Richardson. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a black hat practice.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Holly Richardson. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Holly Richardson|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 23:01, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I was creating the page rather than editing someone else's page.

It doesn't matter. You still need to comply with the paid editing policy(if you are paid) as describe above, which is required by Wikipedia's Terms of Use. 331dot (talk) 22:57, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am not paid. I have just read about drafts. Do you recommend making this a draft and getting reviews?

You state on your user page that you are a journalist and have worked for newspapers, and the ATG is a newspaper. Do you not work for them? I apologize for asking, but this is important. Even if you have no paid relationship, it still could be a conflict of interest. (please review if applicable) The page can be converted to a draft if you want, but given the sources and age of the publication, it could be notable, once the issues are worked out. 331dot (talk) 23:11, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No.Holly Richardson (talk) 07:11, 21 December 2016 (UTC) Sorry, to clarify: There are thousands of journalists in this country and being a sub editor on one doesn't mean you work for or are involved with another. I have not and do not work there. Having been a journalist at other publications in the past (which are owned by other companies and have no connection), I would hope, does not make me biased. Holly Richardson (talk) 07:11, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the clarification. I believe what you say- it only seemed to me (and someone else) that you might be associated with the paper that you wrote an article about. As long as you don't edit about things you were associated with, or are currently in direct competition with, there should be no problem as far as I see. 331dot (talk) 09:10, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comments and your view. I completely understand why you wanted to check. I am not in competition or involved with it. But of course good to check. It looks like there are still issues with the page as it has also been criticised for not having Wikipedia links. I could edit it further to add these but I also don't want to do that if that raises more alarm bells. If you (or anyone else) can advise whether I should edit further on this page then do let me know. Thank you. Holly Richardson (talk) 23:32, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I see no issue with you editing the page, given your statements here. 331dot (talk) 02:42, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comments. I think the page has been deleted so I am now creating in drafts and going down that route. Many thanks. Holly Richardson (talk) 20:55, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Holly Richardson, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Holly Richardson! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Antiques Trade Gazette (December 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The current news listed still isn't significant enough for actual notability, as they're simply interviews, announcements and other triviality and there's no automatic inherited notability from anything or anyone else.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Antiques Trade Gazette and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 16:22, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Antiques Trade Gazette has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Antiques Trade Gazette. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 18:03, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Antiques Trade Gazette (February 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CatcherStorm was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Antiques Trade Gazette and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CatcherStorm ^talk 16:03, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you User:CatcherStorm for taking the time to look at this page. I apprentice it. I am sad that the page isn't not deemed notable. The attributions and citations are much fuller than similar trade publications in the UK that all have Wikipedia pages. I don't suppose you can tell me how pages such as Retail Week, Estates Gazette, Property Week and Travel Trade Gazette all have Wikipedia pages with much less information on why they are notable. I am sorry to complain but I don't understand why the Antiques Trade Gazette is not regarded as notable when it has far more information on this draft page than any of these similar pages. I don't suppose you know why they have been allowed and Antiques Trade Gazette has not. It is not consistent. ~~Holly Richardson~~

Holly Richardson (talk) 21:56, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Antiques Trade Gazette

Hello, Holly Richardson. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Antiques Trade Gazette".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Pkbwcgs (talk) 11:32, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]