User talk:HoAHabesha

HoAHabesha, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi HoAHabesha! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

December 2018

Hello, I'm Turtlewong. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Yohannes IV, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Turtlewong (talk) 18:47, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I shot you a reply, mate

Talk:Cushitic peoples

I might as well add when I'm here anyway; that I find eurocentric viewpoints annoying myself. But that's the nature of an English-speaking board, friend. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MusIbr (talk • contribs) 21:06, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ethio-semites are not Cushitic.

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.219.188.51 (talk) 23:06, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

These are FALSE ACCUSATIONS made by Anonymous user 84.219.188.51 (that doses not have an account),

Ok. Let’s see if we can talk this out in the talk page.

Talk:Cushitic peoples — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.219.188.51 (talk) 03:44, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Here are some good genetics and linguistics blog posts by a Somali geneticist

They’re extremely high quality and the guy seems generally unbiased though he sometimes(not too often) jumps to conclusions made by other geneticists. Though sometimes, he makes a good argument against.. They contain references you might like as well, friend, along with super-interesting content. I suggest his entire blog in fact.

http://anthromadness.blogspot.com/2015/07/horn-africans-mixture-between-east.html?m=0

http://anthromadness.blogspot.com/2017/08/being-more-accurate-about-substrates-in.html?m=0 (He calls Cushitic “Erythraeic”(the old Greek name for the region) in this blog post because he dislikes the biblical connotations apparently)

Cheers! MusIbr (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 03:48, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Hello, I'm Roscelese. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 14:04, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, editing logged out will not help you here. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 20:17, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 13:44, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ethiopian-Eritrean Student Associations for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ethiopian-Eritrean Student Associations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ethiopian-Eritrean Student Associations until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Doug Weller talk 14:34, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Horn of Africa to Cushitic peoples (your addition has since been removed). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. If you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 11:58, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Abyssinian people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Agawa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:05, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

Hello, I'm Havradim. I noticed that you recently removed content from Amhara people without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Havradim (talk) 21:12, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Sub-Saharan Africa. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Eyer ^contact 20:01, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

What is up with the disruptive use of the block templates? Please don't do that. Anyway, no sources — no consideration. El_C 02:29, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for providing sources. We can now engage the material dispassionately. I'm still confused why you placed a block template on my talk page that said I was harassing you — since I did no such thing. But I am happy to overlook all of that and to continue to move forward in resolving this dispute. Thanks again. El_C 04:23, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

To:El_C

Its because we get our voices silenced when we talk about this stuff (I'm talking about the whole Horn African population) when it come to talking about our own history and culture. Plus a lot of the sources previously used came from 1890-1980 European researchers with a bias. I'm almost always dispassionate when I write here.HoAHabesha (talk) 04:28, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Except, you added (click) a template that said I was blocked for harassment — so that was the wrong call (not very dispassionate of you). But again, I'm happy to move on and engage the material without further distractions. El_C 04:34, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semitic "peoples" and academia

You seem to be half a century or so out of date. Modern academic views on the issue are crystal clear - the word applies only to the language family, there is no such things as a Semitic race. If some of our articles don't make that clear, don't blame academia, just ignorant editors who never studied the subject. Doug Weller talk 08:22, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:History and Culture of the Habesha Peoples

Template:History and Culture of the Habesha Peoples has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 11:29, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Habesha peoples

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Habesha peoples/Archives/2020/June#Synthesis, POV. Gyrofrog (talk) 16:21, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Habesha peoples. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. You've just added a malformed (unreadable) citation (twice); reintroduced a problematic reference (already mentioned at Talk:Habesha peoples), and another that was just removed for not supporting this text. Please also see User talk:2601:14D:8581:2C70:8F8:BFA9:5187:A605. Gyrofrog (talk) 17:45, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As it appears that you made these edits while logged out, you also need to review WP:3RR. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 17:54, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Hipster (contemporary subculture), you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 03:53, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of neutral point of view noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Long-term issues at Habesha peoples. Thank you. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 01:28, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hoaeter. Thank you. Gyrofrog (talk) 02:38, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Doug Weller talk 18:15, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]