User talk:Hmazuji

December 2011

Your addition to The Devil Went Down to Georgia has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing

Lyrics are copyrighted, don't add to song articles. Only exception would be if song is in public domain and this is shown in article. Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:57, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

only exceptions if they appear in the public domain.

well, then, why doesn't wikipedia get permission to have the lyrics posted?

or is that beyond your bailiwick ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hmazuji (talk • contribs) 23:18, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia policy is to publish material that can be reused by anyone so permission for Wikipedia use only would break that requirement. If the owner of the song wants, they could release the song with license terms that permits everybody to copy it. They will never do that. Geraldo Perez (talk) 23:33, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Killeter Fair lyrics (January 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Joe Decker was:

This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read 'What Wikipedia is not' for more information.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Killeter Fair lyrics and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

j⚛e decker ^talk 08:30, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Hmazuji, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! j⚛e decker ^talk 08:30, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Killeter Fair lyrics

Hello, Hmazuji. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Killeter Fair lyrics".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13. An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Rankersbo (talk) 20:43, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

Hello, I'm GermanJoe. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, List of PDF software, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. GermanJoe (talk) 23:55, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Faroe Islands (September 17)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Mcmatter was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 03:40, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Faroe Islands (September 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Faroe Islands instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Faroe Islands and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Faroe Islands, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 04:21, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The real faroe islands (September 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Faroe Islands instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The real faroe islands and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The real faroe islands, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 04:21, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Hello, I'm LauritzT. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Faroe Islands seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please also do not insert external links in the body of an article. Thank you. — LauritzT (talk) 05:18, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Faroe Islands. Theroadislong (talk) 13:03, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Faroe Islands. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. — LauritzT (talk) 15:40, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The real faroe islands (September 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Extraordinary Writ was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The real faroe islands and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The real faroe islands, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:36, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just stop it.

There's an article titled Faroe Islands. There cannot be a supplement titled "Faroe Islands", "The Faroe Islands", "The faroe islands", "The real faroe islands", "The truth about the Faroe Islands", or anything else. If you persist in posting the same (utterly unsuitable) draft under different titles, you'll be blocked for wasting other editors' time.

Also, please read and digest Wikipedia:Reliable sources. If you're willing to cite what Wikipedia regards as reliable sources, you can make suggestions on Talk:Faroe Islands for improving the article Faroe Islands. -- Hoary (talk) 07:22, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The real faroe islands (September 17)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Also we have an article on Faroe Islands

Theroadislong (talk) 13:00, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing. All of your recent editing has been blatantly aimed at promoting a point of view, and has contained undisguised expressions of opinion. Moreover, you have repeatedly posted fake "references" which you must know do not support the article content to which they are attached, evidently with the purpose of using Wikipedia to promote and publicise the web page you have been linking to. You have also edit-warred to keep your unacceptable editing in place. Wikipedia is not a medium for promoting any point of view, no matter how noble a point of view one may consider it. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. JBW (talk) 15:46, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. RoanokeVirginia (talk) 11:21, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. RoanokeVirginia (talk) 11:49, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]