User talk:HistoryWrite
Welcome
[edit]
|
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.In addition, editors (such as you) with fewer than 500 edits and less than 30 days tenure are prohibited from editing any page that could be reasonably construed as being related to the Arab–Israeli conflict. See WP:ARBPIA3#500/30 for details. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 05:13, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Please read WP:ARBPIA3#500/30 and follow what it says. You are not allowed to edit any page related to the Arab-Israeli conflict, and any such edits you make may be reverted on sight. Keep it up and you may be blocked from editing. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 04:31, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
- You ought to know that simply having 500 edits and a 30-day-old account doesn't mean your edits won't be reverted if they violated Wikipedia policy. See WP:TRUTH, WP:GREATWRONGS, and WP:BATTLEGROUND for some reasons why. clpo13(talk) 08:26, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
Reported
[edit]You are reported at AE. Zerotalk 09:27, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
February 2016
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Bishonen | talk 23:51, 2 February 2016 (UTC)- Adding: this is an arbitration enforcement block, to enforce this arbitration decision, and has been logged here. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. Bishonen | talk 09:28, 3 February 2016 (UTC).
Unblocked
[edit]You have been unblocked after an e-mail appeal to me. I'm assuming that you now have a deep understanding of the concept of gaming and are well aware of the discretionary sanctions for the Arab–Israeli conflict (WP:ARBPIA) and the meaning of the 30/500 rule. Good luck. Bishonen | talk 16:12, 27 October 2016 (UTC).
Speedy deletion nomination of Sidney Kohlsachs
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Sidney Kohlsachs, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:30, 8 August 2017 (UTC)