User talk:Hiplibrarianship/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Hiplibrarianship. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Hash Bash article
I'm curious - with your recent edits of the Hash Bash article, I wondered if you actually travelled all the way to Michigan to view the event, or were simply touching up the page and adding extra information. Thanks! Daisuke0kun 03:43, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- While I didn't attend the Hash Bash this year, I'd been a couple times previously. Basically I was touching up the page and trying to add some extra info. (And since I was recently motivated to create an article for Chef Ra, I wanted to make sure that it was linked.) Hope you got to attend, and hope you had a blast! -- Hiplibrarianship 17:51, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
- I have attended this years and last years Hash Bash, and both times, while laid back, were loads of fun. Thanks! Daisuke0kun 14:39, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
Musicals infobox
Hey -- I just wanted to thank you for your input on the Infobox. After reading my edit summary, I realized that it kind of sounded condecending, and I didn't want you to think I was being an asshole. That infobox took MONTHS of debate and, as generic as it is, I'm not really sure if it can be improved. You might want to stop in to WikiProject Musical Theatre if you're interested in working on musical theatre-related articles. Might give you some ideas!
And, since no one's officially welcomed you.... — MusicMaker5376 21:06, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Hehe. You can't help but laugh at Charo. Not with. At. — MusicMaker5376 02:13, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
Alphabetization and collation
I am inviting you to comment, in your capacity as a librarian, at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style#Alphabetization and collation. -- Wavelength (talk) 16:11, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
Holy Saturday and Easter Saturday
Thanks for your comment. In Australia, the day before Easter Sunday is nearly always called Easter Saturday - a google search will confirm this, I think. I agree that it's erroneous, but it's very common, and official, so it needs to be in the article. I'm so glad you found a reliable source that we can quote - the blog won't work, but the liturgical commission the the ABC acknowledgement will. StAnselm (talk) 22:04, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
This is really not necessary and just makes it cumbersome. Since there is no article for the song, the better solution would be to use a hat note. I hope you agree. --Muhandes (talk) 17:27, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
- I've been creating the stub for the song. Though your message is making me think that the article for the song could perhaps be the default landing page, with a hat note to the album, and no disambig at all. Thoughts? — HipLibrarianship talk 17:39, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry, I did not realize you were creating the song stub, better start with it first in the future, to prevent misunderstandings. Anyway, it still holds that when there are only two articles, either one can serve as the default (with no qualifier) and the other appear in a hatnote, and a disambig page is not required. I don't care which one. It can also be done the way you did it now, both articles having a qualifier, one of them serving as the target of a redirect, with a {{redirect}} hatnote, and again, the dab page is redundant, though I find this less preferable (making both articles cumbersome). --Muhandes (talk) 18:03, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
- Addendum: I had a look at the song article, and I agree with your choice that the song deserves to be the primary topic. The way I'd do it is ask for removal of I Happen to Like New York through CSD, then move I Happen to Like New York (song) to I Happen to Like New York, as it is the primary topic. Then mention I Happen to Like New York (album) in the hatnote. I'd say it's a personal preference though, you can also leave it as it is now if you prefer it. No matter what you decide, I think a CSD on I Happen to Like New York (disambiguation) is required. --Muhandes (talk) 18:15, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
- I'm not really familiar with CSD templates, or the CSD process, but I took a stab at it. Both the (song) and (disambiguation) should be gone soon, with the relevant content in the unqualified article. Thanks for helping make these improvements.
- If from some reason it doesn't work, go with {{db-author}}, it requires less administrative judgement ;) Happy to have been of assistance. --Muhandes (talk) 18:56, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
- I'm not really familiar with CSD templates, or the CSD process, but I took a stab at it. Both the (song) and (disambiguation) should be gone soon, with the relevant content in the unqualified article. Thanks for helping make these improvements.
- Addendum: I had a look at the song article, and I agree with your choice that the song deserves to be the primary topic. The way I'd do it is ask for removal of I Happen to Like New York through CSD, then move I Happen to Like New York (song) to I Happen to Like New York, as it is the primary topic. Then mention I Happen to Like New York (album) in the hatnote. I'd say it's a personal preference though, you can also leave it as it is now if you prefer it. No matter what you decide, I think a CSD on I Happen to Like New York (disambiguation) is required. --Muhandes (talk) 18:15, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry, I did not realize you were creating the song stub, better start with it first in the future, to prevent misunderstandings. Anyway, it still holds that when there are only two articles, either one can serve as the default (with no qualifier) and the other appear in a hatnote, and a disambig page is not required. I don't care which one. It can also be done the way you did it now, both articles having a qualifier, one of them serving as the target of a redirect, with a {{redirect}} hatnote, and again, the dab page is redundant, though I find this less preferable (making both articles cumbersome). --Muhandes (talk) 18:03, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
Emmys awarded to Whitney Houston
Once again to say, the number(two) for Emmys to Whitney is correct. It's just difficult to find a reliable source cited her second Emmy exactly, not even on Emmy's searchable database as you said. Since 1988, all media have just cited the number like this. The award's exact title, "Outstandning Musical Performance in a Sports Program" (at the Special Olympics), was said on Houston's tour book. crowded(talk) 11:18, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
Gor
Why did you put unofficial sites above official sites, and obscure the distinction between the two? -- AnonMoos (talk) 06:39, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
- The Chronicles of Gor site is not owned or managed by John Norman or people working for him to manage the site, but on the other hand, it is John Norman's main chosen conduit for unfiltered general-subject communications to his fans (going beyond unadorned book publishing schedules). John Norman has no responsibility for the non-Norman-communiqué content on Chronicles of Gor, but on the other hand, he has chosen to issue his communiqués through Chronicles of Gor. Given this, I see no problem with calling it a "semi-official site" (as it was described on the "Gor" page). The World of Gor site played a similar role for a number of years until 2007, when it was the official site of Norman's main publisher at that time. I'm not too sure what you meant by the remarks you left on my user talk page, since right on the homepage of http://gorchronicles.com/ it refers to itself as "the new home for John Norman on the internet" and links to World of Gor as "in many ways" his former "home on the internet". AnonMoos (talk) 06:22, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
Inline external links
First off, IMDB isn't an authoritative source. Second, an inline link of any kind should go to where the link says- if it's to a wiki page, it should be a page about that subject; if it's to an external page, it should be to the item in question. A link titled IMDB that goes to imdb.com is one thing, but a link titled "US Steel Hour" that doesn't go to "US Steel Hour" itself, but instead goes to an imdb page about it is no good. That's just advertising for imdb. Third, why would just one item of hundreds in a table have a link to imdb?
In general, though, you'll find that for GAs, FAs, and FLs, there's just never any inline external links. They're in references and an "external links" section only. Better to just create a Wikipedia page for the subject, and use the external link as a source there. --PresN 19:30, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for thanks note, appreciated, there's a question about whether it should be singer or writers in the brackets. In ictu oculi (talk) 11:58, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
A cup of coffee for you!
|
You seem pretty awesome... I keep seeing your edits around... Howaboutudance (talk) 04:55, 26 March 2014 (UTC) |
March 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mike Edison may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- [[Larry Flynt]], ''[[Penthouse (magazine)|Penthouse]]'' publisher [[Bob Guccione]], and ''Screw]' founder [[Al Goldstein]], the book covers approximately sixty years of American popular culture
- hypocrites-bye-bye-miss-american-pie-video---14797 Mike Edison Takes on Political Hypocrites]-->Mike Edison Takes on Political Hypocrites, ''[[Mr. Skin]]'', 18 September 2012</ref>
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:25, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Library needs you!
The Wikipedia Library
Did you know that Wikipedia has its own library? The Wikipedia Library is seeking volunteers from those in galleries, libraries, archives and museums.
- Become an account coordinator to distribute research accounts to editors
- Get involved in some of our special projects:
- Expand our Resources page with free resources for editors in all subject areas
- Help develop a template for citing archival collections
- Write guides to accessing and using library resources
Delivered on behalf of The Wikipedia Library by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:18, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
Non-free use of File:Cactus cooler can.jpg
Hi Hiplibrarianship.
Just wanted to let you know that I've opened a discussion about the non-free use of this image in Cactus Cooler at WP:NFCR#File:Cactus cooler can.jpg. Perhaps you could help clarify things since you uploaded the image. I know it was quite a long time ago, but perhaps you remember what where you got the image from. Thanks in advance. - Marchjuly (talk) 07:13, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Cactus cooler can.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Cactus cooler can.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:20, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:10, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Lil Mama-What It Is Strike A Pose.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Lil Mama-What It Is Strike A Pose.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:42, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Title of List of information schools page
Someone commented on the Talk page of List of information schools that the title should be named List of iSchools, because of your edit that changed the content of the page to a list of iSchools. "Information school" has a broader meaning that members of the iSchool organization. If the page is going to be about iSchools, then the title of the page should reflect that. Perhaps a list of LIS schools would be appropriate in addition. I think you should go to the talk page and respond. Rlitwin (talk) 13:30, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Hiplibrarianship. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:LCD Consumer Whore cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:LCD Consumer Whore cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:51, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Hiplibrarianship. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Snatch Game for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Snatch Game is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snatch Game until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --woodensuperman 13:57, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.
You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.
Thank you!
Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey
Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.
If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks!
Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey
Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.
If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement.
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:01, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Hiplibrarianship. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:09, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Snatch Game for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Snatch Game is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snatch Game (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --woodensuperman 09:49, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
Ways to improve Madame X (band)
Hello, Hiplibrarianship,
Thanks for creating Madame X (band)! I edit here too, under the username Doomsdayer520 and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-
Thank you for you new article on Madame X. While they indeed had a minor hit with "Just That Type of Girl", the article needs much more information on their accomplishments and any professional reviews or feature articles that they may have received.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 17:38, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
E Pluribus Unum
I'm sorry, but https://www.nationalmotto.org/ is a SPS. It's a web site published by a single organization saying whatever that organization wants to say. That's the definition of an SPS. What's worse in that particular case, is that the organization has published the website with the intent of making a case about In God We Trust being a church-state violation (a case, let me note, with which I at least agree in principle), so it's not only self-published, it's contentiously self-published. If you want to push this, we can take it to RSN and/or RFC, but the far better thing would be to find an actually reliable source if there's one out there. A truly reliable source on this would be one which actually addresses the issue of whether EPU was ever the unofficial motto, not just makes a reference to that idea or assertion in passing, and which is itself a reliable source. Regards, TransporterMan (TALK) 21:32, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
- Abort, abort, abort. Rather than fight over that source, I've found a couple of better ones that are clearly reliable sources for this assertion. I've self-undone the reversion I mentioned above, but will replace the nationalmotto.org with the ones I've found when I get the chance. If you want to see them in advance, here's one and here's the other. Both are from academic presses, so they're pretty solid as sources. Regards, TransporterMan (TALK) 21:46, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |