User talk:Hiperjavier2006

Welcome!

Hi Hiperjavier2006! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 19:49, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

One Piece season articles

Good day, it seems that your edits to the One Piece articles are removing onlyinclude tags from correct places and placing them in incorrect places. Is there something you're trying to solve for by moving the onlyinclude tags? Clay (talk) 02:49, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

that's true, @Clay!! and unfortunately, every seasons of One Piece anime had been divided into every story arcs of One Piece in this articles, just like every Manga books!! correct? Hiperjavier2006 (talk) 05:40, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

oh! and @Clay, thank you so much and it's nice to meet you!!!! Hiperjavier2006 (talk) 05:41, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Hiperjavier2006: Nice to meet you too! It does seem that the One Piece articles are divided into story arcs, but I am not a regular editor on those articles. If you would like to change the layout of the articles, I would suggest bringing it up on either the One Piece talk page or the One Piece (season 1) talk page to get some consensus from other editors. I was only dealing with the issues that popped up on the multi-season summary pages (e.g. List of One Piece episodes (seasons 1–8)), which are made up of transcluded parts of the individual season articles. The transclusion tags noinclude, onlyinclude, and includeonly are good indicators that the article (or part of it) is being transcluded elsewhere, and that you need to check the transclusions as well if you make edits to those tags. Happy editing! Clay (talk) 15:19, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Momentous articles

Hello, could you make an article about the new nighttime spectacular, Momentous at Hong Kong Disneyland, because two months after the show's premiere, it has no yet to have its own article. Additionally, the draft article of it was declined. Thank you. 180.254.160.166 (talk) 06:01, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@180.254.160.166 you're welcome!!😘 Hiperjavier2006 (talk) 06:24, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The EPCOT Experience Center

The article The EPCOT Experience Center has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Promotional article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MrsSnoozyTurtle 06:01, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

EPCOT attractions

Thanks for adding the seasonal rides! LuxembourgBoy42 (talk) 00:32, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 05:53, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit reversion

In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.

I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick (Talk) 15:45, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Sphilbrick, thank you so much!!! but, this time, it must be the timelines of EPCOT history in the events!!! so, one day, there is no more copyright violation at all, it's a secrets as I promise you!!! and sometimes, I'll became the administrator in the future of Wikipedia!!! and one more thing, I apologize to you for what I've done and you deserve a second chance!!! Hiperjavier2006 (talk) 16:48, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it's the time lines. S Philbrick (Talk) 17:37, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Links to draft articles

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Hong Kong Disneyland. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 09:21, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. EvergreenFir (talk) 17:03, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

Hello, I'm Waxworker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, The Wild Thornberrys Movie, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 22:48, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Robert Guillaume, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 21:54, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at List of Hong Kong Disneyland attractions, you may be blocked from editing. Waxworker (talk) 03:04, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Hello, I'm Aguy777. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Disney Adventure World have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Aguy777 (talk) 01:47, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm GoneIn60. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Hollywood Rip Ride Rockit, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. GoneIn60 (talk) 20:48, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Hello, I'm Centcom08. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Blue Exorcist: The Movie, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Also, if you are going to use the term set between or anything related to it, make sure the two works have first existed (or released) before the film. Second season was not even planned in 2012 when the film was released Centcom08 (talk) 10:55, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Blue Exorcist. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Xexerss (talk) 15:27, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Sword Art Online, you may be blocked from editing. Xexerss (talk) 15:28, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Disney California Adventure. Opolito (talk) 03:28, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

D23 announcements

You appear to be adding a lot of items that were announced at D23. Please do not add edits that do not include references from a published source. This looks like original research, which is against the Wikipedia policy of verifiability. Please make sure your future additions have citations. Bahooka (talk) 13:58, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 11:19, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. EvergreenFir (talk) 05:29, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Walt Disney Imagineering. Why do you keep adding content about the future with no references? It violates Wikipedia policy and you've been blocked for it before. Bahooka (talk) 15:05, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Shanghai Disneyland. Please stop adding information without sources. You have been warned about this several times and you have been blocked for it before. Contributor19 (talk) 03:14, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@EvergreenFir: @Jauerback: since you have blocked this user recently for exactly this behavior. They are back at it and clearly unable or unwilling to follow basic Wikipedia sourcing rules. I've also reported them to AIV. Opolito (talk) 03:31, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. PhilKnight (talk) 03:32, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the posting of this notice.

PhilKnight (talk) 07:55, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]