User talk:Himachali chaudhary

Ghirth

Please be more careful in your edits of Ghirth, as your most recent edits were barely legible. If you cannot manage this, you will be prevented from editing the page under the WP:GS/CASTE sanctions of which you were previously notified. Primefac (talk) 17:31, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Community sanctions notification

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in South Asian social groups. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose discretionary sanctions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

--RegentsPark (comment) 22:47, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Rana Beni Madho. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Phil Bridger (talk) 19:06, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

I'm sorry to say your editing does not appear to be a positive to the encyclopedia, Himachali chaudhary. Just today, you used the PROD template for living people, WP:BLPPROD, for a person who died in 1859.[1] Moreover, you said the article had no references, when actually it has 18 of them. And you claimed the sources weren't reliable — how would you know, when you didn't even notice it has sources at all..? (There's actually nothing wrong with the sources.) Also today, you reinserted caste promotion which had been removed.[2] And here is some more caste promotion from a few days ago. I have blocked you indefinitely. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bishonen | tålk 19:49, 16 February 2022 (UTC).[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Himachali chaudhary (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You blocked me directly without giving any warning, this is against Wikipedia rules, this is very wrong and would be a misuse of your rights.Himachali chaudhary (talk) 02:32, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Looking at your talk page history, you were warned several time regarding sloppy edits and caste promotion. You're not going to be unblocked until you convince us that you understand why you were blocked. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 03:27, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

It doesn't matter, it is not blocked for a while.Himachali chaudhary (talk) 07:25, 17 February 2022 (UTC)OhNoitsJamie[reply]

Now tell me how it can be unblocked.Himachali chaudhary (talk) 07:27, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ohnoitsjamie, I believe the user attempted to ping you above. As for my opinion, Himachali chaudhary, caste promotion is not allowed on Wikipedia, and none of your additions at Rana Beni Madho — a BLPPROD template and several tags — make any sense. I would like you to explain what your intentions were when you disfigured the article with them. You don't seem to have checked how they came out, either, which is a minimum for using templates. You can only be unblocked if you're able to convince us that you will no longer post caste promotion, and will edit more competently. Perhaps the best way would be to edit the Wikipedia in your native language for a while, so as to raise your editing skills? Bishonen | tålk 08:09, 17 February 2022 (UTC).[reply]

Bishonen Then you tell me, what reason should I write so that you can unblock me.Himachali chaudhary (talk) 13:42, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How do I request you, so that you can unblock me? Himachali chaudhary (talk) 13:44, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You should read through WP:GAB. Primefac (talk) 14:36, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is an unfair block! I am new here! I did nothing wrong! The blocking administrator hates me! UNBLOCK ME IMMEDIATELY, THIS IS CENSORSHIP.Himachali chaudhary (talk) 15:16, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Primefac What should I do so that you can unblock me?Himachali chaudhary (talk) 16:31, 18 February 2022 (UTC) Please Tell me..[reply]

You could start by explaining how the four templates added by these edits are not vandalism. Phil Bridger (talk) 16:43, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[Bridger] I will take care from future, such mistake should not happen, now unblock it please.Himachali chaudhary (talk) 02:31, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bishonen

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Himachali chaudhary (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will take care from future, such mistake should not happen, now unblock it please Himachali chaudhary (talk) 17:32, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

In their review of your last appeal, Ohnoitsjamie said You're not going to be unblocked until you convince us that you understand why you were blocked. This request fails to do that, and I am hence declining it. Please see WP:GAB for further details. --Blablubbs (talk) 17:57, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

.Himachali chaudhary (talk) 17:32, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Then you tell me how can I get unblocked and what should be the reason for being unblocked.Himachali chaudhary (talk) 18:08, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am not understanding anything, what reason should I write so that you can unblock me, now you tell me please, I have requested and applied many times to get unblocked. Now you tell me.Himachali chaudhary (talk) 02:31, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bridger I will take care from future, such mistake should not happen, now unblock it please

[Bridger] I will take care from future, such mistake should not happen, now unblock it please.Himachali chaudhary (talk) 13:34, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Better try to write another proper unblock request

Himachali chaudhary, there's no point in trying (unsuccessfully) to ping User:Phil Bridger. He's not an admin, and hasn't blocked you or declined your appeal. He can't unblock you; only admins can. Instead, make another proper appeal, using the template {{unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}, as you did before. That will bring another uninvolved admin to this page. But first read WP:GAB, as everybody keeps telling you to do, to learn how to write a convincing unblock request. If you keep writing requests that demonstrate incompetence and unwillingness to adjust to our rules against caste promotion, I'm afraid you will soon lose access to this page. Bishonen | tålk 20:38, 22 February 2022 (UTC).[reply]

I am not understanding anything, what reason should I write so that you can unblock me, now you tell me please, I have requested and applied many times to get unblocked. Now you tell me.Himachali chaudhary (talk) 02:30, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid if you can't understand these instructions, the English Wikipedia is not for you. Apparently you expect an admin to tell you exactly what to say to get unblocked. That is absurd. I should give you something to copy and then I unblock you? No. As you have been told several times, you have to show understanding of why you were blocked. You are saying that you don't understand. I am therefore removing your access to this page. See below for another way to request unblock. (But you will still have to write it yourself. It's no use writing to the UTRS to ask them to tell you what to say). Bishonen | tålk 08:05, 23 February 2022 (UTC).[reply]

February 2022

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Bishonen | tålk 08:07, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]