User talk:Hikaru Kato

Welcome!

Hello, Hikaru Kato!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Kaseng55 (talk) 05:26, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

using a ref more than once

Help:Footnotes has a section on how to name a ref so that for subsequent uses there is a short version. In the refs, these show up as superscripted letters (a, b, c...) at the beginning of the ref. The ref that creates the name does not have to be the first use; one can decide later that earlier text in the article needs that ref. Also, having refs in the Lead section is optional as long as later in the article, where that information is elaborated on, the refs are used there. David notMD (talk) 14:35, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cyclodextran (April 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ToadetteEdit was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cyclodextran and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Toadette ^{(Let's talk together!)} 19:36, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hikaru Kato! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Toadette ^{(Let's talk together!)} 19:36, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Cyclodextran has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Cyclodextran. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 08:08, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cyclodextran (November 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pygos was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Just like what User:Theroadislong commented, the potential application section is very promotional and needs to be rewritten (perhaps also along with the entire Usage section) before being submitted via AfC again.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cyclodextran and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Pygos (talk) 03:44, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]