User talk:Hihiimpal

Speedy deletion nomination of ChriZzy Goodtung

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on ChriZzy Goodtung requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. JamesG5 (talk) 06:10, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ChriZzy Goodtung article available to edit

Hi there. Several versions of the ChriZzy Goodtung article have been posted in the last few days & all of them have been removed for not meeting Wikipedia standards. There is a version in Wikipedia's draft space here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:ChriZzy_Goodtung that's in progress, instead of posting another page you can work on that one to help make sure it's acceptable before it's posted. Please note that the main issues with the page have been a lack of third party reliable sources (news, reporting, etc rather than things like blog posts or Facebook links) to establish notability. Those have to be added in order to keep the article. You can read up on what the article needs at WP:RS and WP:Notability. If you need help, you can find it at the WP:Teahouse. I hope this helps! JamesG5 (talk) 06:19, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, this was put here to help. You said on the talk page you're new & need help, that's what the draft space is for. You can take your time, build the article right, and submit it for review when you think it's ready. If it needs work, someone will assist you. That's a better option that trying to put up a "live" article that doesn't meet the standards, those will just get deleted. Using the draft is the way to go. JamesG5 (talk) 06:54, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from ChriZzy Goodtung, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Please see the above notes on a version of this article that's available to edit. JamesG5 (talk) 06:31, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

help

Can somebody help me with making a artist page for Sony Music artist ChriZzy Goodtung.He deserves a page. Hihiimpal (talk) 08:51, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Go here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:ChriZzy_Goodtung and work on the page at that link. When you think it's ready, submit it for review. It'll be looked over and people will tell you if it's ready. You can ask specific questions at the WP:Teahouse. I can tell you right now your biggest challenge (from googling him) will be to establish WP:Notability as there do not seem to be any reliable sources WP:RS to support an article. JamesG5 (talk) 09:00, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Help

Can somebody help me with making a page for Sony Music artist ChriZzy Goodtung. He deserves it. Hihiimpal (talk) 08:53, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: ChriZzy Goodtung (March 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment they left was:

No sources added - no point in just resubmitting: "Articles generally require significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the topic" (see WP:42)

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ChriZzy Goodtung and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 12:06, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Hihiimpal, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 12:06, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free

Hey feel free to look at the draft I edited for the ChriZzy Goodtung artist page. If you can assist me please do at this moment. Hihiimpal (talk) 15:43, 26 March 2016 (UTC) Hihiimpal (talk) 15:43, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Link

Here is the link:https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:ChriZzy_Goodtung#/editor/4 please assist me. Hihiimpal (talk) 15:55, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of ChriZzy Goodtung

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on ChriZzy Goodtung requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. —C.Fred (talk) 17:58, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: ChriZzy Goodtung (March 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment they left was:

This draft still does not have any references. The past two declines said to add references. Resubmitting this draft without adding references is not useful and will not increase the likelihood of acceptance, which at this point is essentially zero. Resubmitting a draft without addressing the comments of the reviewers is tendentious and may result in sanctions. DO NOT RESUBMIT this draft without adding sources. Just duplicating a section of this draft is not appropriate.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ChriZzy Goodtung and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 04:52, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I.need assistance plz Hihiimpal (talk) 06:10, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Draft:ChriZzy Goodtung. Your edits have been or will be reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. You don't seem to be willing to listen. Stop submitting articles without references to article space. Stop submitting drafts without references in AFC. If you continue wasting the time of reviewers and administrators, a block will be necessary. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:54, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Reflections in Real Time

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Reflections in Real Time requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ben Ben ^(talk) 07:23, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

First, just because you are new does not mean that we can ignore Wikipedia policies. You are aware of Wikipedia draft space, since you have been submitting articles in both article space and draft space. Stop submitting articles in article space, because your articles do not have proper sources. Being new is no excuse for repeatedly making the same mistake. If you don't know why it is a mistake, ask, rather than trying again. In draft space, you get told what you need to do. Ignoring the advice in draft space and resubmitting the article, rather than editing it to add sources, is not useful. If you can't find sources, ask at the Teahouse rather than just annoying us by repeating the same mistakes. Being new does not give us reason to tolerate having the same mistakes made over and over again. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:44, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are aware of the existence of draft space, since you have used it repeatedly for one article, and have persistently resubmitting it without taking our advice. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:50, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe you think that new editors may reasonably submit articles and hope that more experienced editors will fix them. It doesn't work like that. Not every subject is notable, and there are many articles and article topics where there is no reasonable amount of fixing that we can do. You have to do the fixing yourself, if it can be done. That means that you should actually listen to your advice and make the fixes that we request, if indeed they can be made. We have many many new editors, most of whom do a better job than you do of trying to learn. We cannot spend a lot of time holding your hand helping you fix an article that possibly cannot be made notable. If you continue to waste our time, you have been warned, and you may face a block. Ask reasonable questions, and, when you get reasonable answers, try to address them rather than just pushing the same articles back at us. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:50, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

.

I said in recent talk pages that i am NEW..

Instead of quickly deleting articles that i make be kind & assist me. What's the issue with helpin me. Hihiimpal (talk) 07:26, 28 March 2016 (UTC)  Hihiimpal (talk) 07:26, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Part of the issue is that you keep repeating the same mistakes, and not taking advice that's given to you. If you constantly submit articles that don't meet Wikipedia's standards & policies, they're going to get deleted, rather than fixed. "Put up something and hope someone else fixes it" doesn't function well here. You're going to be much better off to use the Draft space, and then follow the guidance you're given there. Please take some time to read the policies you've been linked to by many of us, and look at some of the guides we've linked. JamesG5 (talk) 07:47, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You also need to establish that subjects you want to write articles about are notable. This means they require significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the topic. The subject of Draft:ChriZzy Goodtung doesn't appear to meet this requirement at present. Cordless Larry (talk) 19:36, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Slay-Z, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. You removed the infobox without an explanation. This appears to be vandalism. If you think that the infobox is incorrect, discuss on the article talk page. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:49, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Student of the Game. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Unexplained change of year - Discuss on talk page, especially if you have a history of disruptive editng Robert McClenon (talk) 14:29, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Steve Miller (musician)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 06:10, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Suede (song). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Rob van vee 07:33, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Nappy Boy Entertainment. Jim1138 (talk) 18:37, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Knockout Entertainment. Rob van vee 05:49, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See wp:verifiability. You must wp:cite wp:reliable sources. Simply adding "confirmed" to the wp:edit summary is not verifiable. Jim1138 (talk) 06:17, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 08:06, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Official stuff

Please do add official stuff, but wp:cite the wp:reliable source from which it came from. Please read wp:verifiability which is a core principal of Wikipedia. Please note that most of your edits have been undone - primarily as you did not cite a source. Jim1138 (talk) 08:53, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Savage Life 4, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page E1. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has expressed concerns that you are continuing to add doubtful unsourced content to articles, despite having been blocked for doing so. I therefore checked some of your recent edits, and found not only that you do not provide sources, but also that I could not find sources for some of your edits. For example, you give Sony Music Entertainment as the "parent" of Rap-A-Lot Records, but the most I can find sources for is that since three years ago Rap-A-Lot has had a distribution deal with Sony. If you know of sources that show that Sony now owns Rap-A-Lot, then you need to provide those sources, and if you don't, then you should not put the statement into an article. I also see that frequently your edit summaries just say "official", which is no help at all, as it gives no explanation at all of what you are doing. You have also posted to other editors' talk pages telling them that the edits you make are "official" (whatever you mean by that) and that they shouldn't change them. In one of the messages you even said "before your edits plz clear it with me first", as though you think that you are somehow in charge of an article, that you own it. No one editor owns any Wikiepdia article, and no editor has the authority to instruct other editors to "clear" editing with him or her. You need to provide reliable sources for content you add to articles, and the fact that someone who has created a Wikipedia account chooses to tell people that he or she regards a particular edit as "official" and that other editors must defer to him or her is not a reliable source. Since neither talk page messages about the problems with your editing nor a short block have led to any change, you have now been blocked from editing for a little longer, in the hope that that may encourage you to start taking notice of what you have been told. When the block is over please do not continue to add content for which no reliable sources are available, and equally please don't continue to act as though you think you have the authority to instruct other editors what they can and can't edit. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 09:49, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]