User talk:Higheredutrust

November 2012

Hello, Higheredutrust. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Amity University, you may need to consider our guidance on conflicts of interest.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 19:19, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. However, please know that editors do not own articles and should respect the work of their fellow contributors on Amity University. If you create or edit an article, know that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 08:12, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Theroadislong. I will appreciate your help in how to correctly edit the page to give actual position as on date. Higheredutrust (talk) 09:31, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Amity University shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Wifione ^Message 15:29, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Are you User:Cfiveindia?

Dear Higheredutrust, I noticed that on User talk:Theroadislong, you have mentioned that a few months ago you discussed Amity University with me on my talk page. As much as I could trace, that was only done by User:Cfiveindia. Your statement to Theroadislong seems to confirm that you are Cfiveindia. In this case, you have to immediately stop editing Amity University and you may propose changes only on the talk page of the article which may or may not be placed within the article by consensus. Please immediately read up on our Conflict of interest guidelines. Please also note that the only edits you will be allowed to do from this moment onward on the Amity University page are Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#Non-controversial edits. Please note that if you continue contravening our CoI guidelines, you may be blocked. Please do reveal your conflict of interest on the talk page of the article to enable other editors to appreciate your proposed edits. Thanks. Wifione ^Message 16:06, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your username

This account has been blocked indefinitely because its username is either inflammatory, deliberately confusing, designed to impersonate legitimate users, or otherwise inappropriate (see our blocking policy for more information). You are encouraged to create a new account and contribute to Wikipedia under a more appropriate username, and in a constructive manner. See Wikipedia:Username for guidance on selecting an appropriate username. You may also edit Wikipedia without creating an account. You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia under an inappropriate username, and trolling or other disruptive behavior is not tolerated. If you would like to discuss the block, you may edit your talk page or email the administrator who blocked you.

Due to Wikipedia's mechanism for enforcing name changes, your IP address may be temporarily blocked. Unless you have also been engaging in vandalism or impersonation of another user, we will remove that block as soon as possible — if this doesn't happen within an hour or so, please email an administrator and explain the situation (see the list of administrators).

A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive, or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account.

If you want to keep the contributions from your old account for your new username, please follow these directions:

Add {{unblock-un|your new username here}} on your user talk page. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked, as you can usually still edit your own talk page. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "E-mail this user" on their talk page.
At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names. The account is created upon acceptance, thus do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change. For more information, please see Wikipedia:Changing username.

Note that this can only be done before you create the new one. For more information, please visit Wikipedia:Changing username. In many cases (especially if your account has few or no edits), it is a lot easier to create a new account.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. De728631 (talk) 17:04, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing. In addition to the reason given above, there is the fact that you have used this account and at least one other almost exclusively to try to impose your preferred point of view on articles related to the organisation you represent, and the fact that you have edit warred over a prolonged period, using more than one account, in order to do so. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:16, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]