User talk:HigherFive

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, then place {{Talkback|your username}} on my talk.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, then place {{Talkback|HigherFive}} on your talk.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

Appreciation!

Appreciate the Thank You note for List of My Teen Romantic Comedy SNAFU episodes! Also Sparrow's Hotel could use your help with Kanji/Romaji, I'd rather leave those up to you since you seem to be better able to handle such edits. Happy Editing! ーKirtZJ^Talk 22:00, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Likewise. You are one of the few editors, both willing and capable of writing decent episode summaries, so thanks. I'll get to Sparrow's Hotel eventually. At the very least, I'll pass everything in my watchlist at the end of the cour. ー HigherFive〈Ｔ | Ｃ〉 22:37, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Thanks for converting the refs to gnn format for Haganai!

AngusWOOF (talk) 15:35, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you making them in the first place. I said I'll do something similar for the LNs, but in the end I couldn't settle on a format I like. Besides making a new template (or two) for it, I'm a little lost on what to do there, so any suggestions are welcome. It's probably fine as is too, though. ー HigherFive〈Ｔ | Ｃ〉 16:49, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You could try ref group=lower-alpha for the light novel references, I tried something like that for Where's My Water?: Swampy's Underground Adventures as it does not have many light novels and didn't have to be in chronological order. Alternatively you can use cite book. I did something like that for Anthony Field and Chris Jericho. It'd be a bigger mess if it were like Rosario+Vampire where two manga series and anime seasons were featured prominently. -AngusWOOF (talk) 17:01, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I considered both grouping and 'cite book', but neither of them lets me choose the order. (Unless I do something like a separate group for each volume and then '{{reflist|group=LN 1}} {{reflist|group=LN 2}} [...]', but that seems overly complicated and hacky.)

I think I'll just settle for 'cite book' with grouping and not care about the order. I'll go do it right now, since I already have the templates prepared. ー HigherFive〈Ｔ | Ｃ〉 17:26, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There's another note scheme I've seen used Template:Ref_label. It might be useful. I've thrown it on my sandbox. -AngusWOOF (talk) 17:47, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ooh, that looks like exactly what I need. Thanks! ー HigherFive〈Ｔ | Ｃ〉 17:50, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cool! It looks good! -AngusWOOF (talk) 20:07, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Help

Could you try moving Dog and Scissors to Dog & Scissors i.e. CR's Title. I've been trying to but for some reason the change isn't moving from the "I" category to the "D" category in Category:2013 anime television series. I'm not sure what the problem seems to be. <KirtZJ>^Talk 17:27, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Here's your problem:

{{DEFAULTSORT:Inu to Hasami wa Tsukaiyo}}

(See DEFAULTSORT.)

I've gone ahead and removed it.

As for the "and" -> "&" move, I can't do it, as the '&' redirect page has past edit history. I'll request it at WP:RM/TR. ー HigherFive〈Ｔ | Ｃ〉 17:46, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. Much appreciated. <KirtZJ>^Talk 18:40, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

Demonoid was not a public tracker site. Demonoid required an invitation code to join the site and the trackers were not used on any other torrent site making it a private tracker site not a public tracker site like piratebay — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:BDF8:CB00:D02C:9F05:4504:175B (talk) 18:53, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I never said you're wrong, but your edit still constitutes original research. Furthermore you removed a citation and changed the information that it verifies. ー HigherFive〈Ｃ | Ｔ〉 19:03, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There are all sorts of websites that tell you the same thing about demonoid which means there are published articles. http://lifehacker.com/5936938/how-do-i-torrent-safely-now-that-demonoid-is-down one of many articles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Man made oblivion (talk • contribs) 19:07, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

furthermore if there was a citation saying it was a public tracker it was an inaccurate article and deserved to be removed — Preceding unsigned comment added by Man made oblivion (talk • contribs) 19:09, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Then cite them. FYI, the article you point out here outright says "Demonoid Was Not a Private Tracker". ー HigherFive〈Ｃ | Ｔ〉 19:19, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

fyi if you read the updated edit i did to the page and read the link you just read and then read the other link i posted you would see it is a private tracker. The article basically says it's debatable because MANY consider it to be one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Man made oblivion (talk • contribs) 19:25, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

How's it going? If its not too much trouble could you check the romaji at List of Love Lab episodes and List of Blood Lad episodes? Thanks. >> KirtZ^Message 23:47, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Love Lab's are fine. The 家 in いざ倉橋家! can be read in a million different ways with the same meaning, but there's nothing we can do but pick one, I guess. I've done a few minor changes adding/removing word separators. Those don't really matter as long as you don't separate a character's romaji.

Blood Lad: Same as above, with the exception of 持ってんじゃん. For some reason Google Translate is terrible with gemination sometimes.

The translated titles are the official ones, right? ー HigherFive〈Ｃ | Ｔ〉 00:50, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, the English Titles are official and the Kanji is official. Appreciate the help. >> KirtZ^Message 00:56, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Komano

In your edit, Chihaya calls him Tsukue-kun, but his classmates call him Tsukue-tomu ("Tsu" replaced by "Tsukue" in Tsutomu). BTW, "butts" ? --Unready (talk) 09:59, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, is that so? I must've forgotten about that.

The butts thing was caused by a bug in this chrome extension, so thanks for bringing it to my attention. ー HigherFive〈Ｃ | Ｔ〉 14:40, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I checked both the anime and manga and found no mention of 机とむ, only 机くん. Here's a scan of a page from the manga: [1]. Furthermore, searcging "机くん" on google ([2]) doesn't provide any relevant results. Thus I redid my previously reverted change (no butts this time). ー HigherFive〈Ｃ | Ｔ〉 18:42, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Prison Architect may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

ref> Since then the game has received 14 major updates, with the latest on November 29, 2013.<ref>{[cite web|url=http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2013/11/29/prison-architect-alpha-15-locked-up-by-the-
Architect'' Alpha 15 Locked Up By The Mod Squad|date=November 29, 2013|accessdate=December 3, 2013}}</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:17, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Encouragement of Climb may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

anime-gets-2nd-season|title=''Yama no Susume'' Mountain-Climbing Anime Gets 2nd Season|publisher=[[Anime News Network|date=December 2, 2013|accessdate=December 4, 2013}}</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:01, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kanojo ga Flag edits

Hi, got a question on this statement you added:

A spin-off series also by Nagian began serialization in Monthly Shōnen Rival in its June 2013 issue under the title Kanojo ga Flag o Oraretara: Ō Yūsha yo, Flag o Tateteshimau to wa Nanigoto da!? (彼女がフラグをおられたらおお勇者よ、フラグを立ててしまうとは何事だ!?), abbreviated as Gawoyū (がをゆう).

Is this a true spin-off or just an omake set of adventures? It shows the girls in their RPG roles. Is he sprinkling those in between the main storyline? -AngusWOOF (talk) 15:44, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's a series in its own right – even though the chapters are short, they've been regularly published with each issue of the magazine. (Actually, I didn't know about literally half the chapters: see [3].) So it's got enough material to have an independent tankoubon release. ー HigherFive〈Ｃ | Ｔ〉 16:52, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks for clarifying that. It gets confusing sometimes when they do those omakes. -AngusWOOF (talk) 16:56, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, your concern is understandable. Happy editing! ー HigherFive〈Ｃ | Ｔ〉 16:59, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

You seem to be an expert editor in the 4-panel manga genre. Would you mind taking a quick look at Free! (manga) to see if anything can be added. In ictu oculi (talk) 06:02, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not at all. I'll do what I can for the article though though. ~~ー HigherFive〈Ｃ | Ｔ〉 12:46, 12 December 2013 (UTC)~~[reply]

Actually, I think I'll wait in case the AFD passes. ー HigherFive〈Ｃ | Ｔ〉 13:00, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

Appreciate the Thank You on the List of Encouragement of Climb episodes. Happy Holidays HigherFive! —KirtZ^Message 23:43, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You too! (ﾉ´ヮ´)ﾉ*:･ﾟ✧ ー HigherFive〈Ｃ | Ｔ〉 08:12, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

About anime premiere dates

Hi HigherFive. I remember back in April or May of last year, I started a discussion at WP:VPP on whether or not to use the "official" or "technical" premiere dates for anime. The current practice is a compromise where the official premiere date is used with a footnote explaining the post-midnight airing (as you do), but I can't remember the actual consensus of the discussion. Could you explain what the consensus was to me? Thanks. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 13:21, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I could discern, there was no consensus reached due to the fact that nobody gives enough fucks to generate discussion. (I dug up the WT:ANIME discussion and the resulting VPP discussion.) I started putting in footnotes (if I recall correctly, following Ryulong (talk · contribs)'s example) because they prevent these silly edits and reverts, and because they maintain consistency across articles. I do find it a little clunky though and haven't been lazy with not adding them lately (unless it's brought up like in WUG's case (diff). ー HigherFive〈Ｃ | Ｔ〉 14:07, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, as far as I recall there was no real consensus and RFCs also don't do much. Also, in the future, linking to my user page using {{user}} gives me a notification, and I would appreciate not receiving those in the future unless you are seeking my attention.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 14:10, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't aware of that. Apologies and will keep that in mind. ー HigherFive〈Ｃ | Ｔ〉 15:31, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Anime premiere dates redux

It's been almost a year since that discussion (where no consensus ended up taking place). For you and Ryulong (talk · contribs), do you think it's a good idea to start another discussion so that, once and for all, we can have a consensus as to how we should present airing dates for Japanese media and other series which do 24:00+ airing times, or should the status quo remain? And if a discussion should happen, where should it be done, at WP:VPP or at MOS:TIME's talk page? Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 11:05, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think we really need to set up a brand new consensus. If the reliable sources say a particular date, even if the time puts it in another date, then the date in sources should be used. This is done for American and British TV series that have post-midnight broadcast times as well. Just look at any article on a show on Adult Swim.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 11:18, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ryulong (talk · contribs), The only problem is that MOS:TIME discourages this. However, WP:V is a policy and MOS:TIME is only a guideline, so I guess WP:V takes precedence? Besides, if there were to be a discussion, it would be to clarify and solve the apparent conflict between the two.

Also, since I'm not really familiar with American and British airing times, do those articles also use, say, "Show X began airing on February 13, 20XX at 25:00 AM"? Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 11:29, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No. MOS:TIME just says "after 23:59 is 00:00, not 24:00". It does not say "change the calendar date for events scheduled to occur after midnight". And broadcast times are not listed on these other articles. I just am aware that there are certain programs that are broadcast after midnight and they list the broadcast day as being the same as the shows that aired before it at 11 and 11:30. It is only you, I think, that are insisting otherwise.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 11:50, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nisekoi Episodes

Hello,

Today I added more episodes and summaries to Nisekoi. Although I understand you removing Episodes 3 and higher, I don't understand why you would remove the summaries. I'd like to know the reasoning behind that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.25.75.143 (talk) 21:26, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As I said in the edit summary, that kind of summaries violate WP:COPYPASTE, but more importantly, they don't conform to WP:TONE. If you want to contribute episode summaries, write them by yourself. If you're unsure of what they should be like, a few good articles you can check out are List of Valvrave the Liberator episodes, List of Beyond the Boundary episodes, List of Log Horizon episodes, List of Encouragement of Climb episodes. ー HigherFive〈Ｃ | Ｔ〉 22:36, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Sword Art Online Revisions

Regarding the edit I added on Chapter 16.5: I added the paragraph to stop the continuing defamation of the author's name and his works. Wikipedia is based off sound fact and the edits I did removed a misguided rumor and replaced it with evidence to help readers of the article to understand the facts about the series. As for citation I am rather new to this and didn't know that was required but all the information comes directly from the text. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SwordArtOnlineServer (talk • contribs) 02:54, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, although Wikipedia aims to be truthful, before that it aims to be verifiable and neutral. This means that basically everything you added, needs to be backed up by a reliable source. You claim that it is information that comes directly from the text, but most of it is analysis of it, which should be referenced if it is to stay (See WP:NOR).

You are concerned with defamation of the author's name and works, but Wikipedia is not a place you can address that. Again, please read through WP:NPOV.

The pages you cited in your latest edit (revision) do not back up your point and, more importantly are a copyright violation.

Please at least skip through all that I've linked before trying to re-add your text. ー HigherFive〈Ｃ | Ｔ〉 04:46, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kanji / Romaji Check

Hey how's it going? When you get the chance could you give the List of Beyond the Boundary episodes the usual kanji/romaji sweep check. Thanks! —KirtZ^Message 15:36, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sure thing. ー HigherFive〈Ｃ | Ｔ〉 16:08, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be all correct. ー HigherFive〈Ｃ | Ｔ〉 16:23, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Keep up the good work you've been doing as well. Best. —KirtZ^Message 02:30, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You too! ー HigherFive〈Ｃ | Ｔ〉 08:49, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the fix!

I know its been a few months since it happened but I just wanted to thank you for fixing my horrendous addition to the Accel World wikipedia page. The only reason I made the edit in the first place was because I'd just stumbled across the recently created Amazon page for the first translated light novel and saw that the release date hadn't appeared anywhere else(despite the fact that I had no knowledge of wikipedia formatting or scripting, which was probably glaringly obvious from first glance). Thanks for fixing my horrible formatting and creating that cool four-columned table for the English and Japanese versions!

Oh and before I forget I just stumbled across the Amazon pages for the English versions of the first two Accel World manga volumes earlier today. Since there's no way I'm going to risk a repeat of the disaster that happened the first time I tried editing the page I'll just give the info to someone who can obviously do a much better job with it.

English Release Dates: September 23rd, 2014 and December 16th, 2014

Amazon Pages(left the h out to avoid link-detection trouble):

Volume One: ttp://www.amazon.com/Accel-World-Vol-manga/dp/031633586X/ref=tmm_pap_title_0

Volume Two: ttp://www.amazon.com/Accel-World-Vol-manga/dp/0316296341/ref=tmm_pap_title_0

Caman213 (talk) 22:33, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. I'll add the dates to the article. ー HigherFive〈Ｃ | Ｔ〉 02:03, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Literal readings

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anime and manga#Literal readings on anime titles?. I haven't been paying attention to how the romaji has been treated on that title. Thanks. -AngusWOOF (talk) 21:14, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 8 September

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Love Lab page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, HigherFive. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, HigherFive. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]