Hey. Thanks for helping edit the New World Vultures (King and Turkey). I just wanted to tell you that I've been working on the King Vulture article in my sandbox and will be posting it soon (two more copyedits or so). I've put in the new source you added today, but most of the description stuff is already in there. Not to sound overbearing (though this probably does come off that way, and I apologize), but could you make any future King Vulture edits directly in my sandbox until the article goes live? This way I won't accidently miss something you added when I copy and paste it in. Thanks, and I hope you vote for the New World Vultures on the Bird Featured Topic page. Rufous-crowned Sparrow00:48, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hey. Thanks for fixing those refs at the King Vulture article- I noticed them earlier, but had no earthly idea what was wrong. Anyways, thanks for your help, both at King Vulture and all vultures. Rufous-crowned Sparrow00:24, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Jude, I noticed that you made a new range map for Peregrine Falcon today. Is that a one-time thing, or do you now know how to make range maps? I haven't heard from 'Card recently and a range map is pretty much the only major objection raised to the King Vulture FAC. Could you make one? There are examples at www.natureserve.org and animals.nationalgeographic.com/animals/birds/king-vulture.html. Thanks (and hopefully some more thanks). Rufous-crowned Sparrow22:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I haven't really researched the GY-hV much, but I am assuming that their data is pretty similar to the LY-hVs since they were the same species until the 70s or something. If you type in Greater Yellow-headed Vulture on Google Books, the first one has a lot of info on the Lesser that I am planning on using and the start of the Greater. If one of us can track that book down (or maybe someone else in the project owns it), I bet that will have a lot of info.
Also, thanks for working on expanding the Turkey Vulture and finding this much on the Greater Yellow-headed Vulture. You have a whole lot more info on it than I even thought was out there. Thanks. (Oh, and I should upload King Vulture tonight or tomorrow (EST). Rufous-crowned Sparrow00:06, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I honestly don't know how much longer the Greater Yellow-headed Vulture article should be for GA. We really need a picture to plug in of the bird- I'm not sure if it could really pass otherwise. There has to be one somewhere. I'm going to work on the vultures more over the next four days (Fall Break), but it should probably get another 4,000 or so bytes. It is at 12,210, while GA Dusky Woodswallow is at 8170 (with photo) and FA Elfin-woods Warbler is at 16,977. I'm going to actually read both articles tonight (haven't had a chance yet) and will look for more sources. Thanks. Rufous-crowned Sparrow02:10, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
My guess is that it could pass GA without it, but as you said it is definately perferable to have a picture. I'm currently taking my first real look at the GY-hV article, but according to my printed version it does not yet have a Conservation or Relationship with Humans section. I'll swing by BirdLife and make the Conservation, but have you seen anything on GY-hVs in mythology, culture, or zoos?
Also, I'm seriously thinking about throwing King Vulture at FAC soon unless someone raises a major objection (or just tells me that I'm crazy). Its as long as several of the FAs (Elfin-woods Warbler, Emu) and I don't know how much more info we can find. I'm looking into having someone make a range map (he did California Condor's), but do you by any chance make them? Rufous-crowned Sparrow23:37, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I think that the Greater Yellow-headed Vulture article has enough information to become a good article (if in doubt, look at how short most of the bird GAs are). However, it needs a good copyedit or three. Let me play with it for, say, 24 hours before you nominate. I'll also try to add a habitat picture so it doesn't look so dull. Thanks with all of your help with the NWVs. Rufous-crowned Sparrow23:32, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Gone through it once now, will go through at least once more. Two quickies- could you convert both ends of the metric units to English units for the centimeters and stuff? Most of them are in the Description, but I recall there being more. Also, the lead could be expanded- will try to add on myself. Also, what does evaporatively mean in the urohidrosis? An explanation or something would help. (Just noticed the wikilink) Anyways, I think it looks pretty good. I'd like to give it one more copyedit in the next 23 hours, and, assuming the above if fixed, go for GA (in my humble opinion). Thanks. Rufous-crowned Sparrow00:01, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I gave the article another copyedit. In my opinion, it should pass GA easily. I'd review it myself, but I have a feeling that that would be considered a conflict of interest. I wonder how long it will take. Anyways, good job on the article and thanks for the Andean Condor map. Thanks. Rufous-crowned Sparrow00:36, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yay! Congrats on getting the GY-hV passed, and so quickly too. I thought, judging by past experience, it would be there for about a month. This featured topic is really moving along. I'll take a look at the Lesser Y-hV article, but, with that GA, that only leaves Andean Condor, which I plan on having about FA status by Monday, Turkey Vulture, which, to use a bad analogy, is trying to find a space in the FA parking lot, then New World Vulture itself, the biggest remaining challenge (hopefully Sabine's Sunbird, who has written the only two bird family articles, and Casliber and JerryFriedman (both have expressed interest) will help out, and American Black Vulture, which I've got on slate after the Condor, are the only ones left. (whew, that is a long sentence.) Anyways, congrats and lets follow this thing through!
Just printed off my copy of the LY-hV article and noted that the Greater seems to be the subject in some of the sections. I changed it to Lesser, but are you sure that the behavior of the species is that similar?Rufous-crowned Sparrow21:27, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I just went over and reviewed the Turkey Vulture article. After a copyedit, it looked good to me, though I would suggest fiddling with the pictures a bit. Also, I asked Shyamal to do some sketches of the two Y-hVs. She has done an in-flight of the Greater but cannot find some good head shots. I'm planning on looking tomorrow, but if you know any you might want to drop them off with her.
Also, I was really busy in real life this past weekend, so Andean Condor remains unworked on. However, I've got free time (as in right now) and am going to start hand-writing my paragraphs.
Sure. I've got Wendsday and Thursday off, so I'll look at Black Vulture before finally working on Andean Condor. Also, I've got some information on Black Vultures in Maya hieroglypics to plug in. Rufous-crowned Sparrow20:48, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Good article, I was about to review it...but you might want to check the first 2 sentences in the diet section...."it exists entirely on carrion" but "also hunts". Maybe it exists "mostly" on carrion? Other than that, great job! I'm going to use it to compare a few articles I've been working on (Blue iguana and Green iguana before nominating them.--Mike Searson00:17, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, that was fast. So fast, that I've actually found a couple of additional localities that weren't in the last review article on the taxon. There are additional sites in India, china, and in Nepal. Hold off on updating, since I'm still looking into additional sites, but thanks for the map. --EncycloPetey01:34, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the update. Is the creation of distribution maps something you're willing to do on a sporadic basis? There are a few other bryophyte articles nearly ready for a distribution map. --EncycloPetey02:47, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Just got through looking the article over. I think that it is ready for a FAC. However, before you do so, a few quickies. First, could you put the describer's full name and link it in each of the subspecies? Does anyone mention the bird's peak breeding season? And could you get the external links up to 4-5 good ones (movies are nice). After this, go for FA. Thanks for all of your hard work. Rufous-crowned Sparrow05:42, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Wow that was quick! thanks - 2 things - would be great if the M l lamberti text with coloured box aligned under the rogersi, I am happy with the colours but maybe some other folks will think they are not contrasty enough. Blue was a good choice due to the little critters' colour - the 2 at the top are called lavender flanked x so various shades of purple may be useful too. cheers, Casliber (talk·contribs) 22:43, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I've been going through the Northern Cardinal article and have noticed that you talk about American Goldfinches as a subject in the lead I have a feeling that this is a mistake. Just a heads up. Rufous-crowned Sparrow03:22, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I'm currently swamped with work- ie, in addition to what I normally do, I now have a magazine to make by th 21st. I will be on break until then. However, I am still planning on doing the Andean Condor and in fact have all the papers I need by my bed. It should be done by the day after Thanksgiving. Just thought I'd let you know- feel free to delete this message. Rufous-crowned Sparrow01:27, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I was in WA and took a cool photo of this critter, and as it has more published research than the Variegated Fairy-wren I polished it up for FAC. There is a distribution map here though the monograph-type book I have does not have the wedge-shaped bit sticking eastowards along the south coast of Western Australia (the line above keeps going SSW to the coast). This critter has no subspeices so one colour is fine. All help much appreciated - and feel free to lemme know of any fixes before I toss it up at FAC in the next few days. cheers, Casliber (talk·contribs) 14:50, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
'TIS MANGO SEASON.... Have a shlice of mango cheek...well, I am up to my armpits in the things. Yuletide means lots and lots of mangos, as well as turkey and ham and ice-cream and pressies. Were on special so I bought 3 crates for AU$20 and now I have both crispers in the refrigerator full and even with everyone eating two of the ##$@& things every mealtime... I am a bit mangoed out so I thought I'd spread the goodwill around....cheers, Casliber (talk·contribs) 05:15, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hey Jude! Good to see that you are back. I don't recall adding the specifications to the article so don't have a sourcr. I'll look for it though. I'll see what I can add to what you've already done. Thanks. Rufous-crowned Sparrow (talk) 03:03, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If you haven't checked Google yet, here is the list of websites I made for myself when I was going to work on it. I'll chip in with some, but if you want them...
Great job on the page. I'll give it a thorough readthrough tomorrow, see what I can add. Sorry I wasn't more of a help, but I'm glad that the websites at least were useful. Again, great job from what I have read so far. Rufous-crowned Sparrow (talk) 03:05, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hey Jude. The final stretch for the New World Vulture FT is here now that Andean Condor got featured. Congrats on that. Now that we’re down to New World vulture (which I’ll be more active in on Saturday after the SAT, I promise), what are your thought on how to proceed? The biggest issue that I can think of is the exclusion of Cathartes, the only non monotypic genera. Since there has never been an organism-based FT before, do you think we should post a message at the talk page for FTs and see what they think or nominate and wait? Personally, I don’t think that a family-based FT would need all of the genera, but I’m not the expert.
Also, how do you think we should treat the order status in the taxoboxes for the vultures? Some have it in Cicionnes (sp badly), while others have it as uncertain. We probably need to unify that. Also, what picture do you think should be used as the lead pic for both New World Vulture and the FT box? I’m not a big fan of the one in there now, and the American Black Vulture lead pic is featured and shows the whole bird. Too bad we don’t have a multi-species pic.
Sorry for the late reply- busy times for me. Hope your exams are going well. Anyways, I'll leave a note at the FT page to see what their take on genera is. I don't know when I'll be able to help out at Cathartidae- again, there should be more hours in a day. I'll also change the taxoboxes to match Andean Condor's at some point. Thanks. Rufous-crowned Sparrow (talk) 02:22, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hey jude,
I have a favour to ask WRT maps if you have any time free - it is for Amanita ocreata, a mushroom which occurs from Baja California to Washington state and inland to the foothills of the Sierra Nevada range. Not sure how far inland that is though as my geography of california ain't that good. Do you have any maps handy to work on or shall I find a couple...All input greatly appreciated..cheers, Casliber (talk·contribs) 10:30, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I have a little problem at FAC - a reviewer thought the choice of blue was a little unfortunate as it is next to the coastline and hence potentially confusing....I haven't played with .png's before but need to tweak the colour to something else (not fussed, whatever looks nice...). If you're still around I'd be really grateful. Casliber (talk·contribs) 11:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Casliber (talk • contribs) [reply]
Uh oh... needs to be altered to the sum of the distribution maps on these four pages:
Jude, thanks a heap for what you've done. Peter (who's the expert) thinks we need to trim the BC distribution off the map. I really appreciate the effort and sorry about the last correction. :( Casliber (talk·contribs) 19:49, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Jude: I'm working on the first WP:BIRD newsletter, and am wondering if you'd like me to highlight the American vulture featured topic as one looking for editors to help. If you're currently taking a break from that topic, no worries—just let me know if/when you're ready to resume! MeegsC | Talk00:52, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The March 2008 issue of the Bird WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:42, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The April 2008 issue of the Bird WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:55, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The May 2008 issue of the Bird WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:39, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The June 2008 issue of the Bird WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 13:10, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The December 2024 issue of the Bird WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. --Addbot (talk) 16:19, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Jude: While answering a question for someone re: the presence of American Black Vultures in Maryland, I had a chance to look at the map you made for the article. I think it might need slight modification, because it doesn't seem to show it far enough north along the east coast. It's definitely a regular species into New Jersey and Pennsylvania—and perhaps even further north (it's been some years since I lived there), but the map seems to show it petering out in Virginia or even further south... MeegsC | Talk07:07, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
PS: I hope you have this map saved as this %&&($#% bot keeps trying to remove it. I uploaded it as Fair Use and it is notifying me it is an orphaned article (grrr) Cheers, Casliber (talk·contribs) 03:31, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Hey jude, I saw you and your awesome username pop up on my watchlist and I couldn't help but stop in to say hello. From one user with a Beatles song-related username to another, I hope only the best for your Wiki endeavors. :) María(habla conmigo) 16:00, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The August 2008 issue of the Bird WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. MeegsC | Talk01:02, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The October 2008 issue of the Bird WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:22, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The December 2024 issue of the Bird WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by TinucherianBot (talk) 07:46, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hey Jude, We are looking for help on the Pope John Paul II article in order to improve it and raise it to ‘Good Article’ and eventually ‘Featured Article’ status. So, I though I would invite you to take a look. Any help would be much appreciated.
Kind Regards Marek.69 talk02:49, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The February 2009 issue of the Bird WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. MeegsC | Talk22:01, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The March 2009 issue of the Bird WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:37, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The May 2009 issue of the Bird WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
The June 2009 issue of the Bird WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
The American Goldfinch is a North Americanbird in the finchfamily. It is migratory, ranging from southern Canada to North Carolina during the breeding season, and from just south of the Canadian border to Mexico during the winter. The only finch in its subfamily which undergoes a complete molt, the American Goldfinch displays sexual dimorphism in its coloration; the male is a vibrant yellow in the summer and an olive color during the winter months, while the female is a dull yellow-brown shade which brightens only slightly during the summer. The male displays brightly colored plumage during the breeding season to attract a mate. The American Goldfinch is a granivore and adapted for the consumption of seedheads, with a conical beak to remove the seeds and agile feet to grip the stems of seedheads while feeding. It is a social bird, and will gather in large flocks while feeding and migrating. The breeding season is tied to the peak of food supply, beginning in late July, which is relatively late in the year for a finch. Human activity has generally benefited the American Goldfinch. It is often found in residential areas, attracted to bird feeders installed by humans, which increases its survival rate in these areas. Deforestation also creates open meadow areas which are the preferred habitat of the American Goldfinch. (more...)
The Peregrine Falcon is a cosmopolitan bird of prey in the family Falconidae. The Peregrine reaches speeds of over 320 km/h (200 mph) during its characteristic hunting stoop, making it the fastest extant member of the animal kingdom. The world's most widespread bird of prey, it can be found nearly everywhere on Earth, except extreme polar regions, very high mountains, and most tropical rainforests; the only major ice-free landmass from which it is entirely absent is New Zealand. While its diet consists almost exclusively of medium-sized birds, the Peregrine Falcon will occasionally hunt small mammals, small reptiles or even insects. Reaching sexual maturity at one year, it mates for life and nests in a scrape, normally on cliff edges or, in recent times, on tall human-made structures. The Peregrine Falcon became an endangered species in many areas due to the use of pesticides, especially DDT. Since the ban on DDT from the beginning of the 1970s, the populations recovered, supported by large scale protection of nesting places and releases to the wild. (more...)
Ichthus is the newsletter of Christianity on Wikipedia • It is published by WikiProject Christianity For submissions contact the Newsroom • To unsubscribe add yourself to the list here
Hi! I'm serving as the wikipedian-in-residence at the Smithsonian Institution Archives until June! One of my goals as resident, is to work with Wikipedians and staff to improve content on Wikipedia about people who have collections held in the Archives - most of these are scientists who held roles within the Smithsonian and/or federal government. I thought you might like to participate since you are interested in the sciences! Sign up to participate here and dive into articles needing expansion and creation on our to-do list. Feel free to make a request for images or materials at the request page, and of course, if you share your successes at the outcomes page you will receive the SIA barnstar! Thanks for your interest, and I look forward to your participation! Sarah (talk) 20:04, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I see you haven't been active in quite a while, but I still wanted to leave this note on the off chance that you might look in now and again. Thanks for serving so many readers with your work--I hope we'll see you back again someday. -- Khazar2 (talk) 01:56, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
birds
Thank you, user who believes in coffee and loves Labrador Retrievers, for quality "comprehensive, well-referenced" articles about birds, such as American goldfinch and Turkey vulture, listed on an exquisitely modest user page, for clarification and categories for project Catholicism, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
