User talk:Hervé Babylonia

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Saksihw (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Vanjagenije (talk) 18:40, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hervé Babylonia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi. I have only one Wikipedia account. Maybe you are making a confusion with my formers roomates who also contribute to wikipedia. My best proof is that I have moved to another continent. I'm sure you can check that fact. Moreover, I have never participated to any debate on wikipedia whith my roomates. You can also check this fact. So please, UNblocked my account. Thanks.Hervé Babylonia (talk) 18:35, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The checkuser results seem to indicate both accounts stem from the same device, not just the same location, so I don't believe that you're separate users. only (talk) 22:04, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{unblock reviewed | 1=

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hervé Babylonia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The checkuser result "seems" or prooves"? Because your guess is incorrect. So based on your reasoning I'm left to assume that Wikipedia edition is only for people who can afford their own home. It also seems that the Wikipedia procedure allows an user to be condemned based on the subjective interpretation of an admin or based on unshared evidence. I THOUGHT THAT WIKIPEDIA WAS FUNCTIONING ON AN OPEN, FAIR, AND COMMUNITY BASIS, BUT IT APPEARS NOT. So go ahead, ban me from it, but at least there will be a trace of my honest defense.Hervé Babylonia (talk) 22:21, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please include a decline or accept reason.

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.