User talk:HelloEverybody528

December 2016

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Ghostbusters (2016 film), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 08:38, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Some suggestions

Hello. Thank you for your steps toward being an active editor in Wikipedia. I have a couple of suggestions that you may find helpful.

First, as you may have noticed, inserting material without reliable sources, particularly in biographical articles of living people, will be removed if considered controversial, debatable or questionable. The best way to make sure your work stays in the article is to provide citations from reliable outside sources such as major newspapers or magazines.

The next thing is edit summaries.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. You may even use common abbreviations for certain changes, such as sp for spelling, ce for copyediting, gmr for grammar, punc for punctuation, and so forth. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. I look forward to seeing you around Wikipedia and if you are stuck and looking for help, check out guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have. Cheers, LovelyLillith (talk) 00:06, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kevin Spacey. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. sixtynine ^{• whaddya want? •} 00:26, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Charlie Sheen. - FlightTime (open channel) 00:28, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 00:49, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]