User talk:Helios007

Welcome!

Hi Helios007! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! AshLin (talk) 05:54, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Need to learn referencing

Hi Helios007, your edits to the article on ma are appreciated. However, there is one area of improvement that needs immediate attention from you - how to cite and reference! At present, the way that you are adding references are not satisfactory. Use of single square brackets around a url is not the authorised WP:MOS way to cite a reference.

You need to use cite templates instead. The most useful of the cite templates is <ref>{{cite web|url= |title= |author= |date= |website= |access-date=}}</ref>. By filling in the details and placing this after the full stop of the sentence that it references, you can ensure that it comes in the list of references below the article.

Besides "cite web", there are many others:

For book: <ref name="">{{cite book |title= |last= |first= |authorlink= |coauthors= |year= |publisher= |location= |isbn= |page= |pages= |url= |access-date=4 June 2021}}</ref>. See this page.

For website: <ref name="">{{cite web |url= |title= |author= |date= |work= |publisher= |access-date=4 June 2021 |archive-url= |archive-date=|url-status=live}}</ref>' See this page.

For research paper: '<ref name="">{{cite journal |last1= |first1= |last2= |first2= |year= |title= |journal= |publisher= |volume= |issue= |pages= |url= |doi= |access-date=2 June 2021}}</ref> See this page.

For audio-visual media: <ref name="">{{cite AV media |people= |date= |title= |trans-title= |medium= |language= |url= |access-date= |archive-url= |archive-date= |format= |time= |location= |publisher= |id= |isbn= |oclc= |quote= |ref= }}</ref> See this page.

For a report: <ref name="">{{cite report |author= |author-link= |authors= |date= |title= |url= |publisher= |page= |docket= |access-date=21 May 2021 |quote= }}</ref> See this page.

For a news report: <ref name="">{{cite news |title= |author= |url= |newspaper= |date= |access-date=2 June 2021}}</ref> See this page.

If you give a reference a name, then the same reference can be re-used by using <ref name="your_name"/> wherever you need it instead of duplicating the citation many times.

You can learn more about citation and references at WP:CITE.

Happy editting :), AshLin (talk) 06:18, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, there thanks for your suggestions, I am new to this wiki and there are little to no reference available for this tank outside. I am using pdfs released by the DRDO and OFB as an source for writing. Wikipedia does not allow pdf containing links as an reference thats an main issue over here. Helios007 (talk) 07:22, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What gives you the impression that links to PDF documents are not supported? Fabrickator (talk) 07:47, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oops I encountered the problem because I copied the wrong link! Sorry! Helios007 (talk) 08:02, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Helios007. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Vhhhhjhgy (talk) 07:31, 4 June 2021 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Hlo there,
Thanks for your answer it helped me a lot. And I would like to know how to protect images from being deleted by some strangers even though provided with enough documents to support the image?. Everytime I upload an image to the Wikipedia some one delete it without proper reason. Is there anyway to prevent it? Thank you! Helios007 (talk) 08:10, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have also responded to your question at the Teahouse – you should not upload the source document to Commons (or to Wikipedia), but add a citation to the source itself. More info in your Teahouse thread, which has been restored (please don't remove it, it will be archived in a day or two). Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 08:17, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:ARJUN THERMOBARIC ROUND.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:ARJUN THERMOBARIC ROUND.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 09:00, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:ARJUN THERMOBARIC ROUND.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:ARJUN THERMOBARIC ROUND.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 09:45, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request

I've seen that you have made unsourced edits on Arjun(tank) article, please don't vandalize it with unnecessary information please it's a request, it took me more than a week to rewrite that article section by section, sentence by sentence. You might know how mess it was before, it's frustrating to see that someone is giving no respect to your work and trying to make it look like what it was before. Please don't discourage --Echo1Charlie (talk) 08:47, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This page was ver messed up and was plagued by Western guys as u told, I appreciate your work, and I would like to post all the reference before editing the Wikipedia page, u may tell which one is needed and which one is not. Helios007 (talk) 09:08, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Here are some sources for DMR-1700 https://publications.drdo.gov.in/ojs/index.php/dsj/article/view/16403/7388 https://www.researchgate.net/figure/ballistic-performance-comparison-of-dmr-1700-steel-and-rHA-steel_fig1_318368846

Helios007 (talk) 09:12, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I've seen it. Well done Good job --Echo1Charlie (talk) 14:42, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

One help bro,I have found an document containing the test of the arjun mk-2, which States the Missile firing capabilities of the tank. But I am unable to hook it as an citation, here's the linkhttps://www.google.co.in/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://164.100.47.193/lsscommittee/Defence/16_Defence_18.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwiRyfDOt-fxAhVy73MBHb6mCHEQFnoECAQQAQ&usg=AOvVaw1UD01pXvnUNOzdHR_q8-eN Anyway to use this as an citation Helios007 (talk) 11:16, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —valereee (talk) 12:05, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Helios007 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the block is no longer necessary because i understood the reason for such problem and will not reapt this in future, the cause of the problem was lack of co-ordination between the editors, now it's been restored ,so I think that this block is not necessary

Decline reason:

Based on how you were behaving just hours ago I have little confidence in your intention or ability to work productively here. This is a solid block. HighInBC ^{Need help? Just ask.} 12:42, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Helios007 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the block is no longer necessary because,the problem has been resolved through proper communication between editors, the root of the problem was deletions of my paragraphs which had strog citation proof of the statements, the reasons told by the person @Echo1Charlie and @FORMALDUDE are the roots of the problem. Here is my article https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1034019505 how ever they deleted the entire para with proper reasoning, just made an statement "IT IS UNNECESSARY" which can't be acceptable at all, I had even left many chats on their talk page but there was no response at all, I re-upload that article but again he deleted that without any proper response , without asking any citations or anything this loop was repeated again and again until it was ended few hours ago through proper reasoning from the @Echo1Charlie, Helios007 (talk) 13:50, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are now blocked for sockpuppetry, and will need to address that as well. 331dot (talk) 06:43, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Helios007 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the block is no longer necessary because,the problem has been resolved through proper communication. Helios007 (talk) 13:47, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Closing this request, and leaving the other one open. There's no reason to have multiple unblock requests open. ^{!ɘM γɿɘυϘ}⅃ϘƧ 16:18, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Helios007. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. - TheresNoTime ^😺 09:39, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Helios007 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the block is no longer required as I have understood the terms of Wikipedia and will not violate it again and the errors I had caused without knowing the terms& conditions of wikip will not be repeated again,as I have learnd about them Helios007 (talk) 08:04, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Zero content appeal. Your ability to make further appeals has been withdrawn. MER-C 10:01, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.