User talk:Helen7274
Welcome
[edit]Hello Helen7274, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; they have helped improve Wikipedia and made it more informative. I hope you enjoy using Wikipedia and decide to make additional contributions. Some resources to help new Wikipedians include:
- How to edit a page
- Editing tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Article titles
- Manual of Style
As a contributor to Australian articles, you may like to connect with other Australian Wikipedians through the Australian Wikipedians' notice board and take a look at the activities in WikiProject Australia and associated sub-projects.
If you are living in Australia and want to subscribe to location based notices, you can add location userboxes to your userpage.
Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~; this will automatically produce your name and the date.
If you have any questions, please see Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, try the Wikipedia:Help desk, or ask me on my talk page. Or you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Thank you for signing up! Chris Troutman (talk) 06:04, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
|
Hi Helen7274!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. Hope to see you there! This message was delivered by Chris Troutman (talk) 06:04, 29 July 2014 (UTC) |
Your recent edits
[edit]
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (
or 
) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 23:17, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
Userpages are optional
[edit]Look at anyone's and see the type of material they put there, always about themselves. You can do it now, next week, next year or never. They are a sort of vanity, a conceit. Fiddle Faddle 07:25, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
[edit]
- Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 13:55, Saturday, November 23, 2024 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Your submission at Articles for creation: Terrance Plowright (September 19)
[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Terrance Plowright and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question
[edit]
Hello, Helen7274! I'm Timtrent. I have replied to your question about a submission at the WikiProject Articles for Creation Help Desk. Fiddle Faddle 10:04, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:Terrance Plowright has a new comment
[edit]AfC notification: Draft:Terrance Plowright has a new comment
[edit]Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question
[edit] Hello, Helen7274! I'm Timtrent. I have replied to your question about a submission at the WikiProject Articles for Creation Help Desk. Fiddle Faddle 09:30, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
Above all, be encouraged. You have done a fine job. This is the tidying and titivating phase. Fiddle Faddle 09:33, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
Combining references
[edit]I will show you by example:
Here is some text<ref>referenced by this material</ref>, and more text.<ref>referenced by this material</ref> produces this:
Here is some text[1], and more text.[2]
Here is some text<ref name="useful name">referenced by this material</ref>, and more text.<ref name="useful name" /> produces this combined set of references:
Here is some text[1], and more text.[1]
It's a matter of naming your reference and choosing a name that is sensible, and following precise syntax. Fiddle Faddle 08:49, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Terrance Plowright has been accepted
[edit]The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Fiddle Faddle 06:52, 13 October 2014 (UTC)This is a message to Chris Troutman, Arthur goes shopping, and particularly Fiddle Faddle/Timtrent.
I want to thank you all for the time and effort you put into reviewing my article and for your patient responses to what might have been ignorant and silly questions. It is through your input, encouragement and feedback that I was able to improve the article to the extent that it has been accepted, even if only as a C-Class assessment (I shall work at improving it).
One thing I'd like to comment on is how terribly rude some 'newbies' (I think that's what they're called) are and the sense of entitlement many have. I liked the comments you made, Fiddle Faddle, about 'being nice to reviewers'; if I were to offer any word of advice to potential contributors, it would be 'be nice to the reviewers'; they are doing us all a big favour by reviewing our articles and by insisting on stringent and appropriate standards. I was impressed, Fiddle Faddle, at how you managed to maintain your cool despite people's abruptness and rudeness...although there were times when you cut those people down to size, in a nice and polite, but incisive way - I applaud you (and ps: I like your user page). I also want to agree with something you said earlier - writing for Wikipedia is fun (demanding, time-consuming, but fun) - I still have an ENORMOUS amount to learn.
I do have some questions and wonder if I can continue asking them here (please tell me if I ought to be asking them elsewhere)? Should I wish to create a new article (I don't at the moment), how would I go about doing this given that my original article is still in my sandbox? Also, if I wish to continue adding to/editing the Plowright article, do I do it via the sandbox? If so, does it automatically update the accepted article? I am a little nervous about doing the wrong thing.
thanks and regards helen Helen7274 (talk) 00:36, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for your comments. I'm glad your article was finally accepted. Reviewers genuinely want to accept articles but we have to hold a hard line. As for those n00bs, everyone gets frustrated. Wikipedia, like any organization, runs on people; dealing with people can sometimes be the key issue. Timtrent/Fiddle Faddle is one of our better reviewers.
- Your sandbox is currently a redirect to Terrance Plowright. You can delete that coding and continue using your sandbox for something else. Feel free to continue working on the article. You have seven days to submit a hook from Terrance Plowright to the "Did You Know" WikiProject, which would get thousands of views on this article.
- As for asking questions, you have a couple choices: The Help Desk is your best bet for general questions. You can always hit any editor up on their talk page. You might also find help if you ask on the talk page of a germane WikiProject. As with many things on Wikipedia, your question may have been asked before and you can find the answer searching talk pages. Chris Troutman (talk) 04:15, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
Thank you, Chris. I decided to bite the bullet and experiment both with the accepted article and within my sandbox and managed. Thanks for the information about the hook - something else I didn't know about. Thanks also for the tip on asking questions. This is all still a steep and challenging learning curve for me - and nothing like the editing/proofreading of academic papers I sometimes do!
thanks again helen Helen7274 (talk) 04:40, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
I'm sorry to ask this question here but I am struggling to find the right forum in which to ask it - of course, it probably because I'm not very good at navigating my way around things. Anyway, that aside, please can someone check this out and tell me whether or not it is legitimate: I have found a link with the heading Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Terrance Plowright and the sub-heading is: wpedia.goo.ne.jp/enwiki...talk.../Terrance_Plowright. It's dated Apr 10, 2013 and most of the information in it seems to have been lifted from Plowright's website.
thanks and regards helen Helen7274 (talk) 03:02, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, that's one of many mirrors of Wikipedia. Because of Wikipedia's license, other websites can host copies of Wikipedia's content and profit by running ads. Chris Troutman (talk) 04:29, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Helen7274. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |