User talk:Heeheetickletime

Heeheetickletime, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Heeheetickletime! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Jtmorgan (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

November 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at John T. McManus. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Ghinga7 (talk) 19:25, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Heeheetickletime! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, how?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Greg Gibson (umpire), you may be blocked from editing. — Ddxfx 14:28, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Cupper52 (talk) 14:29, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to MrBeast have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: MrBeast was changed by Heeheetickletime (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952321 on 2021-03-03T16:24:42+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:24, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cat. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Cat was changed by Heeheetickletime (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.953017 on 2021-03-03T16:33:09+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:33, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Richard E. Berlin, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Richard E. Berlin was changed by Heeheetickletime (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.969987 on 2021-03-03T16:43:13+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:43, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Aseleste was:

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Unclear what you are trying to write about.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Heeheetickletime/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Heeheetickletime/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~ Ase1este_{charge-parity}^time 16:50, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Heeheetickletime/sandbox

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as User:Heeheetickletime/sandbox, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Theroadislong (talk) 16:52, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]